Jump to content

#savemwo Community Town Hall Two Bravo


103 replies to this topic

#101 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 22 August 2013 - 07:36 AM

View PostSirDubDub, on 19 August 2013 - 08:24 PM, said:

Aw Hell with it.

*snip*

[TLDR - I disagree with you guys, but let's not be {Richard Camerons} about it this time]


Posted Image

#102 Buyao

    Member

  • Pip
  • The Warden
  • The Warden
  • 16 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 22 August 2013 - 06:53 PM

View PostVorpralmar, on 22 August 2013 - 06:01 AM, said:

seriously if your not here to assist in saving mwo please go join the liars in the command chair

Even though I disagree with him too, he is entitled to his opinion. We also need different views on this issue to

keep us honest, and further refine our arguments. I appreciate him actually taking the time to write his points

down while keeping it civil.

#103 Sybreed

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,199 posts
  • LocationQuebec

Posted 22 August 2013 - 08:13 PM

Anders,

what's with the recent posts about WoL sabotaging MWO by forcing 3rd person view implementation? Seems way too far fetched to be true.

#104 Nekki Basara

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 921 posts
  • LocationDublin

Posted 22 August 2013 - 08:36 PM

No man it's totally true. We actually fronted the money to found both PGI AND IGP just to play a long-con game whereby we'd pick a well established and semi-dormant computer game IP, talk it up nobody's business and then deliberately run it into the ground over a period of a few years all the while trying to convince the playerbase that we were in it for the good of the community. Posted Image





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users