Jump to content

Center Torso Hitboxes And Tin Foil Hats


19 replies to this topic

#1 MisterFiveSeven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 290 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 02:15 PM

So I've been thinking a lot recently about how every new mech that comes out has a huge ct hitbox. This means that they benefit more than other mechs from an XL engine.
XL engines cost a boatload of cbills... Leaving you less cbills to buy new mechs.
This means more incentive to purchase new mechs with MC instead of cbills, which are already in shorter supply due to the rewards changes.

Tin foil hat or brilliant marketing strategy?

#2 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 18 September 2013 - 02:17 PM

Very sneaky sneaky. However, the loophole is that people can simply avoid buying those "XL friendly" mechs and go for other choices instead.

#3 Grey Ghost

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 661 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 03:51 PM

Posted Image

#4 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 18 September 2013 - 04:06 PM

It isn't necessarily a bad thing... having an XL option is technically a hitbox/balance decision. On the other hand, the mechs like the Orion are kinda squishy.

#5 MisterFiveSeven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 290 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 04:49 PM

View PostDeathlike, on 18 September 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

It isn't necessarily a bad thing... having an XL option is technically a hitbox/balance decision. On the other hand, the mechs like the Orion are kinda squishy.


I agree there needs to be some variety. I don't mind certain chassis being better suited to XL than standard, there just seems to be a pattern emerging...

Anyway, I'm reasonably certain they only "fixed" the Kintaro because a bunch of people spent real money on them.

The anger over something like the Awesome has just turned into painful acceptance. I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it'll ever get revised.

Edited by MisterFiveSeven, 18 September 2013 - 04:49 PM.


#6 MadCat02

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 668 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 05:37 PM

i do agree that some mechs are inferior in design to begin with

then again is there a such thing as perfect balance? never seen that in a vedio game

theres nothing to loose but your own ego so just enjoy the game

Edited by MadCat02, 18 September 2013 - 05:38 PM.


#7 Dracol

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Steadfast
  • The Steadfast
  • 2,539 posts
  • LocationSW Florida

Posted 18 September 2013 - 05:48 PM

Ah the Awesome... was always shown as a barndoor in the source material. Any other rendition of it would have just looked silly.

#8 MisterFiveSeven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 290 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:02 PM

View PostMadCat02, on 18 September 2013 - 05:37 PM, said:

theres nothing to loose but your own ego so just enjoy the game


Who's talking about their ego?

#9 Krivvan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 4,318 posts
  • LocationUSA/Canada

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:14 PM

The Jenner and Dragon are some of the biggest CT mechs around, and they were in from the start.

#10 Otto Cannon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,689 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:18 PM

Posted Image

#11 Glaive-

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 951 posts
  • LocationIn a cave

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:20 PM

Posted Image

#12 MisterFiveSeven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 290 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:35 PM

We'll see what project phoenix looks like....

#13 Applejack

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 523 posts
  • LocationEquestria

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:35 PM

Regardless of whether or not these 'Mechs are more XL-friendly, they could be weaker no matter which engine type they choose since the CT kills you no matter what. It also makes it more difficult to spread damage around, further reducing the power of an oversized CT/undersized RT/LT.

It may also be a trade-off. Smaller RT/LT's mean there is less armor neccessary in these locations, no matter which engine type you choose. It also means that the weapons mounted in the LT/RT are less susceptible to destruction.

#14 Lightfoot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 6,612 posts
  • LocationOlympus Mons

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:43 PM

Tin foil hat I think. The mechs with the big CTs are just supposed to die faster because of their ELO placing as far as I can tell. Excluding the early delivered Awesome all the big CT mechs are tops in their ELO weight classes. The Victor has a smallish CT.

I would like it if the hit-boxes overlapped slightly so the damage gets spread out a bit more realistically. Mechs would last a little longer too, maybe fewer weapon nerfs would be needed.

#15 MisterFiveSeven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 290 posts

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:52 PM

View PostLightfoot, on 18 September 2013 - 06:43 PM, said:

The mechs with the big CTs are just supposed to die faster because of their ELO placing as far as I can tell.


You'll have to explain this. Not sure I follow.

#16 xengk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 2,502 posts
  • LocationKuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Posted 18 September 2013 - 08:01 PM

I actually prefer the pre-buff Kintaro with it's huge CT.
This allow me to trim almost 2ton of armour from side torsos to field XL engine, more weapon or DHS, it is a like free endo steel that doesn't take any crit space.

#17 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 18 September 2013 - 08:41 PM

View PostMisterFiveSeven, on 18 September 2013 - 04:49 PM, said:

Anyway, I'm reasonably certain they only "fixed" the Kintaro because a bunch of people spent real money on them.


Well, that and the CT was actually 90% of the mech (a little exaggeration, but let's be honest, it was the sure bet to core one).

Quote

The anger over something like the Awesome has just turned into painful acceptance. I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it'll ever get revised.


Well, if you whine long and hard enough, you might get your way... see Raven.

View PostKrivvan, on 18 September 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:

The Jenner and Dragon are some of the biggest CT mechs around, and they were in from the start.


The Jenner's large CT is its own problem, but considering it is arguably the best light on the field, it's hard to ask for a buff for the most useful light in the game.

The Dragon... I'm biased to the Quickdraw... and despite it being "larger than life" at times, it's better than the Dragon's seemingly "easy to core from any direction". Although, it does have a playstyle difference...

#18 Krivvan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 4,318 posts
  • LocationUSA/Canada

Posted 18 September 2013 - 08:57 PM

View PostDeathlike, on 18 September 2013 - 08:41 PM, said:

The Jenner's large CT is its own problem, but considering it is arguably the best light on the field, it's hard to ask for a buff for the most useful light in the game.


I agree, it's the one main downside to the Jenner that makes the other lights at least somewhat viable in comparison.

#19 PanzerMagier

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 1,369 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSome nameless backwater planet

Posted 18 September 2013 - 11:15 PM

It's enough of a conspiracy that I can believe it's true. It's not enough to persecute them for it. ^.^
Besides there's bigger things to argue about.

PGI/IGP has some real shady business ethics. Absolute Maximum cash grab and absolute minimum customer relations care.
But you usually pick up that practice when you work with a minimum viable product model.

#20 General Taskeen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,737 posts
  • LocationCircinus

Posted 21 September 2013 - 11:03 AM

View PostDracol, on 18 September 2013 - 05:48 PM, said:

Ah the Awesome... was always shown as a barndoor in the source material. Any other rendition of it would have just looked silly.


Nope.

Skinny, Flat CT center line

Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users