Tichorius Davion, on 27 August 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:
Yeah, did you even read the reasoning behind 3PV? It was in the design tanks much longer than people thought. The purpose of this beta to test. We guinea pigs that are asked to test features whether they work or not. In this case I do agree that 3PV is something that should only be used in a tutorial.
Am I going to ask for a refund and blatantly spit in the face of PGI by saying they are liars and are incompetent? No.
NOTHING IS SET IN STONE. Not a single thing they say ever unless it is in a legally binding contract is prone to consumer suits.
When League of Legends cancels a champion are you allowed to pull for a refund on every penny you spent?
If you want to remove a feature then add simple, objective, and constructive criticism. They aren't lying because for them they only say whats on their mind and not what they will decide is best for the game. In this case the dev team found that 3PV was important enough to be developed. I won't be happy until they either remove it or delegate it to a tutorial only feature. I will not act like a spoiled angry child.
The purpose is evidently not to test. The 3pv that went live incorporated none of the feedback given from the test server run. It was unchanged.
There are so many features that haven't been changed from feedback given before or after implementation that one must conclude pgi cares or understands little. They are indeed incompetent.
This topic is locked

















