245 replies to this topic

[soarra]

PGI please do not remove or delete
You want to hear from your core fans, well we are the ones on the forum

Edited by soarra, 30 August 2013 - 11:15 AM.

[soarra]

Thank you to the players who put this in their sigs.. you guys rock

[MustrumRidcully]

I would add: When you do the split queue thing, give the 3PV players their minimap back, and consider some more lenient camera settings. That way, it would be really newbie friendly.

[Kanatta Jing]

Wow, people will care about anything won't they?

[soarra]

MustrumRidcully, on 28 August 2013 - 10:20 PM, said:

I would add: When you do the split queue thing, give the 3PV players their minimap back, and consider some more lenient camera settings. That way, it would be really newbie friendly.

Would rather see a full tutorial like the other mw games had

Edited by soarra, 28 August 2013 - 10:59 PM.

[Faithsfall]

This is at least a fair poll asking for a true representation of what ppl want unlike the totally biased poll from PGI

[Jonathan Paine]

Personally, I don't want 3pv at all - but is ok with separate queues.

[skill gap]

It seems pretty selfish to vote "no 3pv at all" over separate queues. I wouldn't care if people are using it in matches that I'm not in. Anyone care to give any reasons why they'd vote for that?

[Brawnfet]

gumpy2k7, on 28 August 2013 - 11:09 PM, said:

It seems pretty selfish to vote "no 3pv at all" over separate queues. I wouldn't care if people are using it in matches that I'm not in. Anyone care to give any reasons why they'd vote for that?

I voted the same as you, however it will likely split the user base which probably can't currently support both. I'm just of the opinion that a separate queue for each will effectively result in no 3pv at all as players just gravitate to the larger 1pv pool.

[soarra]

As much as I want 3pv gone I can't vote that way. I could be content if it was separate, if the population could handle it.
If it can't it should be removed till they can implement a separate queue or lobbies where you can choose 1pv only

[vyolin]

I voted no, While not being opposed to 3PV being implemented in a meaningful way the current implementation is so godawful that it'd better go. Lies and all that notwithstanding...

[KinLuu]

I -do- want seperate queues.

If it is not possible to do, because the playerbase is to small to sustain four different queues, please tell us PGI.
At least give a plausible reason for not implementing 1PV only.

Edited by KinLuu, 28 August 2013 - 11:50 PM.

[csebal]

vyolin, on 28 August 2013 - 11:36 PM, said:

I voted no, While not being opposed to 3PV being implemented in a meaningful way the current implementation is so godawful that it'd better go. Lies and all that notwithstanding...

The vote is a bit too complicated, with multiple choices effectively meaning the same thing.
At the core, the question boils down to this:
What do you prefer to play:
1PV (pretty much all votes from option 2 and 4)
Mixed 1PV/3PV (all votes from option 1, 3 and 5)
3PV (not represented in this vote ... sadly)

If there are many more who prefer one or the other, then by all means, make the game cater to them. If there is a roughly equal number of users for multiple options, then there might be a reason of splitting queues.

Voting on technical implementation is not really our job as players. Its PGIs job to find the best implementation for the features we are asking for. Be that different queues, 1PV being limited to 12v12, etc.

Edited by csebal, 28 August 2013 - 11:53 PM.

[Wolfways]

soarra, on 28 August 2013 - 11:34 PM, said:

As much as I want 3pv gone I can't vote that way. I could be content if it was separate, if the population could handle it.
If it can't it should be removed till they can implement a separate queue or lobbies where you can choose 1pv only

My thoughts exactly. I don't think anyone can say 3pv is well made just now, it doesn't really help new players at all.
I would prefer that it was only used as a training tool in the training grounds, or for a limited number of matches, but if players do want it to use it whenever they like then i'm fine with that, if i'm not forced to play with them.

[Sintaichi]

I personally like the way 3PV was implemented. I wouldn't mind being able to shoot down people's drones. I don't really care what they do with it, I just want the hyper-negative posts to become less frequent. I feel this community's negativity towards PGI hurts the game more than anything the devs have done. (I really hate Hero Mechs, so that's saying something hopefully.)

Edited by Original Luke, 29 August 2013 - 12:33 AM.

[darthJaeger]

If you want to use it, then use it with other like minded people.

Use a seperate queue !

[soarra]

Original Luke, on 29 August 2013 - 12:33 AM, said:

I personally like the way 3PV was implemented. I wouldn't mind being able to shoot down people's drones. I don't really care what they do with it, I just want the hyper-negative posts to become less frequent. I feel this community's negativity towards PGI hurts the game more than anything the devs have done. (I really hate Hero Mechs, so that's saying something hopefully.)

My problem with the drones being destructible is that they were implemented to help new players learn to move their mech .
As of now they are not much help to the new players since you lose your map and can't even see your legs.
Keep 3pv in a separate queue or just in the training ground and or new tutorial coming out.

[Wolfways]

Original Luke, on 29 August 2013 - 12:33 AM, said:

I feel this community's negativity towards PGI hurts the game more than anything the devs have done.

But the negativity is being caused by PGI.
Besides, forums are for whining (i.e. constructive criticism) on. All games have forums for players to whine on, and the more passionate they are about the game the more they'll whine.
But with issues like ECM, the heat system, etc. it's never going to be as happy as it was in closed beta again

What's wrong with hero mechs? (not that i have any)

[Tolkien]

Bump - the sleazy loaded question in the PGI poll is [redacted] since they already know damn well what the community wants.

Edited by Egomane, 29 August 2013 - 01:35 AM.
language

[Aethos]

I think you should remove 'do not want it at all' since its already widely known on the forums that the vocal minority aka forum majority don't want it but its here, and here to stay. At least this would push more votes into the split ques, which is all we really want.

TBH it doesn't matter, this poll will be deleted by tomorrow.

Remember guys, it's because they cared so much that they are doing this.

Edited by Aethos, 29 August 2013 - 01:04 AM.