13 replies to this topic

[D A T A]

Not a single weapon is where it shoud be......... you just lowered te power of all weapons, and now they are all useless............
there is no way for professional players that like to aim....the only way to go now is a spam if mismatched and ***** weapons and to keep a continuous fire on the enemy.

this advantages high fps players and high ping players.
people that have low fps can not aim continuously at the enemy, must shoot and hide. (shoot and hide at a distance is the basic of the tactics.


THE WAY WAS THE OPPOSIT: make 30-40 Alpha strike ppc gauss possible, so we are allowed to play in a strategic way, and not in a MESS WAY increase damage of all other weapons and rise armor of 40 % on all mechs reducing it's weight.

[DaZur]

Pfffft...

I want a 90-point alpha just to be sure!

[The Boz]

No.

[Heat Seeking Civet]

IL MECHWARRIOR, on 11 September 2013 - 12:40 PM, said:

there is no way for professional players that like to aim....the only way to go now is a spam if mismatched and ***** weapons and to keep a continuous fire on the enemy.

If i'm not mistaken, you just contradicted yourself.

There is even more way for the "professional players" to aim because as you said you have to keep "continuous fire" on the enemy. Ergo, if you can AIM, your continuous fire gains a death much faster than anyone who cannot aim and support continuous fire.

[Livewyr]

CoD MW3 is that way----------->>>

(They have Sniper Rifles and HC modes. Go forth, and forget about armored engagements..)

[One Medic Army]

Mechs are supposed to take time and significant weight of fire to kill.

If you want things to die quickly, please ****.

[Mystere]

IL MECHWARRIOR, on 11 September 2013 - 12:40 PM, said:

there is no way for professional players...

Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!


You try-hards really make me laugh!


Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

Edited by Mystere, 11 September 2013 - 05:06 PM.

[Homeless Bill]

2/10

[Heat Seeking Civet]

Homeless Bill, on 11 September 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

2/10

Just for fun, you should try to interview this OP or a guy like him. I really want to know how these people think.

Edited by ForestGnome, 11 September 2013 - 06:30 PM.

[Livewyr]

ForestGnome, on 11 September 2013 - 06:29 PM, said:

Just for fun, you should try to interview this OP or a guy like him. I really want to know how these people think.

I would listen to the podcast or watch the youtube video. I too am curious.

[Joseph Mallan]

DaZur, on 11 September 2013 - 12:49 PM, said:

Pfffft...

I want a 90-point alpha just to be sure!

I want my Stone Rhino and its 75 point Alpha. 3x Gauss 2 ERPPC. 15 Dubs... It would cause so much death!

[Alex Warden]

One Medic Army, on 11 September 2013 - 03:47 PM, said:

Mechs are supposed to take time and significant weight of fire to kill.

If you want things to die quickly, please ****.

just ignore ILMechwarriors posts...he has absolutely no idea what he´s talking about..he has proven this in like a dozen similar threads with different topics... all of them have been ripped apart immediately... with good reason

[DaZur]

Joseph Mallan, on 12 September 2013 - 04:13 AM, said:

I want my Stone Rhino and its 75 point Alpha. 3x Gauss 2 ERPPC. 15 Dubs... It would cause so much death!

Sadly... because it moves slower than a molasses fart in the middle of Canadian January... In MW:O it'd be torn apart by packs of lights.

That said... before they set upon you the "fish in a barrel" analogy would be epic!

[Joseph Mallan]

DaZur, on 12 September 2013 - 04:41 AM, said:

Sadly... because it moves slower than a molasses fart in the middle of Canadian January... In MW:O it'd be torn apart by packs of lights.

That said... before they set upon you the "fish in a barrel" analogy would be epic!

I would think packs of lights would have done the same on TT... Thankfully, packs of lights didn't happen nearly as often as they do here