Jump to content

Does Anyone Else Get The Feeling That The Uac/5 Was Buffed...


21 replies to this topic

#21 Lightfoot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 6,612 posts
  • LocationOlympus Mons

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:15 AM

View PostFoxfire, on 13 September 2013 - 03:01 PM, said:

to give PGI an excuse to gimmick it up?

I felt that the UAC/5 was in a good place before with the 25% chance to jam and the buff that it received has yet to make any sense to me... unless it was done intentionally.



Actually the biggest buff to the UAC-5 was the removal of the weapon that held it in check, the Gauss Rifle. Never see anyone with Gauss anymore and I always saw lot's of UAC-5's/AC-5's doing higher DPS than the Gauss Rifle, but not being able to p'wn the maps because the Gauss Rifle was a real danger to them at long range. The UAC-5's always won at short range over everything else and 2x AC-5's always did 60% more DPS than one Gauss for only one extra ton. Put the Gauss Rifle back in the game with a more reasonable nerf like a 5-6 second recharge and the UAC-5 problem goes away.

#22 Sable

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Predator
  • The Predator
  • 924 posts

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:37 AM

every little action is a conspiracy for future actions.... OR they just didn't realize the size of the effect it would have.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users