Joseph Mallan, on 16 September 2013 - 07:19 AM, said:
Both. Only I see it as debating not arguing
You call it potato, I call it tomato
Joseph Mallan, on 16 September 2013 - 07:19 AM, said:
Damage wise, is a MG on par with a small laser and SRM2? If yes, the weapon is fine leave it alone. If not, get it there and leave it alone!
I'd say the MG is in an okay spot where it is right now - I'd love for it to get a slight, slight buff so that it's better when mounted in pairs, but I'm also aware that this would probably make it OP for real when mounted by sixes, so I'm not going to push the point.
As to whether it's equal to the SL, I'd say yes, it is. Both do 1 DPS against armour, the MG does more against internals but does need ammo and has spread whereas the SL doesn't need ammo and is pin-point. I'm prepared to split the difference and call it even.
The SRM-2, now. They probably should have another look at that; I can't fathom why it's still at 2.0 damage when the auto-aim SSRM-2 got buffed to 2.5 damage. The cool down reduction was good, but I don't think it matters all that much when it does a full point of damage less than an auto-aim weapon - nobody's going to replace their SSRMs with SRM-2s any time soon, and that's a shame. Manual aiming should be rewarded, not penalized.