The issue, for the most part, revolves around cover fire. A large part of most matches is two teams firing and maneuvering around cover. How many times have you missed the opportunity to take a shot with the new gauss because the timing simply failed to line up from when you spotted the target to when you started to charge the gauss to when the target was back behind cover? Occasionally, to expand upon the frustration of this occurrence, a second target will pop out a moment later, but by the time you've oriented on him you've lost the charge, and by the time you've charged again, this guy is back under cover.
I understand that the gauss is a "sniper weapon," but unless you're sniping from somewhere like the radio tower on Alpine where you can just rain death with impunity onto targets who are devoid of cover, the gauss rifle is simply costing you damage due to these timing issues that are largely out of the control of the shooter, and I see no reason to take a weapon that suffers from such a liability when I can use autocannons that, while they suffer some deficiencies compared to the gauss rifle at long range, fire when you need them to, which is in balance, a far more important asset.
Edited by Huntsman, 27 September 2013 - 05:48 AM.