

About The Thunderbolt
#1
Posted 19 October 2013 - 11:00 AM
#2
Posted 19 October 2013 - 11:08 AM
Just hoping after I get the 2x unlocks maybe it'll come to life like the Victor did.
#3
Posted 19 October 2013 - 11:28 AM
You weren't checking it in testing grounds were you?
Edited by Roughneck45, 19 October 2013 - 11:28 AM.
#4
Posted 19 October 2013 - 11:31 AM
#5
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:20 PM
I look at the 5S and wish it had JJs.
Then I realize that a XL is a bad idea on this mech in general.
Then I give up and choose Shadow Hawk.
Rinse and repeat since Tuesday around 1:00 PST.
#6
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:25 PM
CarnifexMaximus, on 19 October 2013 - 12:20 PM, said:
I look at the 5S and wish i could poptart.
Then I realize that a XL is a bad idea on this mech in general.
Then I give up and choose Shadow Hawk because it can poptart.
Rinse and repeat since Tuesday around 1:00 PST.
Sorry, that's all I read from that.
Edited by Biglead, 19 October 2013 - 12:26 PM.
#7
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:28 PM
At least, this is my experience so far. Maybe I'll change my mind on this further down the road.
#8
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:29 PM
#9
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:48 PM
#10
Posted 19 October 2013 - 12:51 PM
SgtMagor, on 19 October 2013 - 12:48 PM, said:
Stock? As in no double heat sinks "stock"? Yeah, no wonder it would feel like a hit and run design, without DHS you need to get out from under the opposition's sites while you cool down.
Or am I mistaken on your lack of DHS upgrade?
#11
Posted 19 October 2013 - 01:01 PM
#12
Posted 19 October 2013 - 01:12 PM
#13
Posted 19 October 2013 - 02:00 PM
But to answer the OP's question, to me the Thunderbolt feels sluggish with anything smaller than a 300 size engine. I'm running STD275s (68.5 kph) in my 5S and 5SS and it's borderline. Should be better with Speed Tweak and Elite efficiencies. I hope.
#14
Posted 19 October 2013 - 02:25 PM
#15
Posted 19 October 2013 - 02:47 PM
#16
Posted 19 October 2013 - 02:48 PM
Basically I just toss DHS and an ERLarge and Artemis plus streaks. Not impressive firepower, but I cram a lot of DHS and it runs pretty good. Tried XL for a bit and dumped the missiles, but its just feels... wrong.
#17
Posted 19 October 2013 - 03:07 PM
#18
Posted 19 October 2013 - 03:26 PM
I love them just about as much as I love my shadowhawk and that surprises me because the Tbolt was the one mech i was least excited about having in the phoenix package.
The one thing I have learned when it comes to the Tbolt is that it is tough as nails. Use those arms, use that torso twisting. I feel like i can take more punishment in my Tbolt than i can in my battlemaster. Not because it has more armor but because they have to peel it like an onion - . arms, torso, then CT.
Are they as powerful as twin 20 jagers? no, but they are also not as fragile as them either.
My best builds typically around having 1-2 long range weapons followed by loads of mediums or Srm's and just beat people down by having better aim and taking their return fire on non-critical locations. (Arm, Torso, then CT)
it just feels like an exceptionally solid mech.
#19
Posted 19 October 2013 - 03:39 PM
Biglead, on 19 October 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:
Well Big, I feel the same way about it, and I don't poptart at all. The Shad though is just an amazingly well done mech period, a real home run for medium pilots, whereas I can't really find one thing that my Thuds do better than my Catapults or Jagers, especially my Jagers.
There is only so much diversity that can come from shape and torso rotation/arm reflex mods. It to me is kind of a good example of my argument for Armor caps based on Stock armor, and sized hardpoints. Simply put, it's schtick in TT was being a tank, but in reality, since everyone just max armors everything anyhow, it has no durability advantage over the Cat or Jager, both of which also carry XLs much better for various reasons, so it also really can't match them for firepower.
I don't think it's so much that the Thud is bad, as it simply doesn't really do anything at all to stand out as a better option than what I already have. And I should probably get prepared that the reality is we will see this a lot more from now on, but I can always hope, since we have 3 very different feeling 50 tonners. But then, one of them IS the Trebuchet, so I guess you get stuck with one in every family.
#20
Posted 19 October 2013 - 05:22 PM
Carrioncrows, on 19 October 2013 - 03:26 PM, said:
It feels like this is the case without even trying, I literally don't have to think about spreading damage on it, it just happens.
Yes, Jager has a more easily managed firepower (less diverse loadout), and the high arms are awesome, but I really feel vulnerable in them. Maybe it just comes down to style <shrug>.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users