small correction someone stated.We do have mechs that can carry dual ac20's. King Crab was more of a defensive beast and was ment to be low standing. There was also a variant with dual Gauss.Should be a bit wider though.FD version is interesting but it doesn't give me the feel of a crab.
7
Kgn-000
Started by Rina Fujimoto, Oct 26 2013 11:08 AM
48 replies to this topic
#41
Posted 11 March 2014 - 03:40 PM
#42
Posted 29 May 2014 - 11:28 AM
Great Job, I really like it!
How about a Blood Asp Please?
How about a Blood Asp Please?
#43
Posted 02 June 2014 - 12:24 PM
BEAUTIFUL model, but the hitboxes and width seem a little... off.
I'd make the KC's model wider then the Atlas, but shrink down it's CT hitbox to balance the 'mech and make it about as hard (if not harder) to kill then an Atlas. Otherwise, other 'mechs will EAT the KC's CT for breakfast.
The low-riding model makes sense (DUH. That is the whole point of the design.) I'm just worried about the size scaling and the hitboxes...
I'd make the KC's model wider then the Atlas, but shrink down it's CT hitbox to balance the 'mech and make it about as hard (if not harder) to kill then an Atlas. Otherwise, other 'mechs will EAT the KC's CT for breakfast.
The low-riding model makes sense (DUH. That is the whole point of the design.) I'm just worried about the size scaling and the hitboxes...
#44
Posted 25 June 2014 - 08:51 AM
Wider. Taller. Claws please. kthx.
#45
Posted 11 July 2014 - 02:31 AM
And somehow due to "Scaling balance", the King Crab will end up wider then the Alpine peaks mountain and as tall as an Atlas....
#46
Posted 17 September 2014 - 06:24 PM
THE PROPHECY HAS BEEN FULFILLED.
NOW WE WAIT.
NOW WE WAIT.
#47
Posted 18 September 2014 - 05:53 AM
1 word, MAJESTIC!
If the official model is any close to that i will be thrilled, i only wish the HP will be even on the mech, i like symmetric builds.
If the official model is any close to that i will be thrilled, i only wish the HP will be even on the mech, i like symmetric builds.
#48
Posted 15 October 2014 - 01:29 PM
I´m looking forward to it but I would prefere the Comstar Model KGC-001 because the KGC is realy slow so you can reduce the effect of getting slowly into damage range with the range of the two gauscannons.
If somebody realy likes close combat the KGC-005 Model with two LBX-20 instead of the AC20 could be realy interesting.
If somebody realy likes close combat the KGC-005 Model with two LBX-20 instead of the AC20 could be realy interesting.
#49
Posted 15 October 2014 - 06:25 PM
Pesadillas, on 15 October 2014 - 01:29 PM, said:
I´m looking forward to it but I would prefere the Comstar Model KGC-001 because the KGC is realy slow so you can reduce the effect of getting slowly into damage range with the range of the two gauscannons.
If somebody realy likes close combat the KGC-005 Model with two LBX-20 instead of the AC20 could be realy interesting.
If somebody realy likes close combat the KGC-005 Model with two LBX-20 instead of the AC20 could be realy interesting.
You can change the ballistic weapons to anything of your choice
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users