Artgathan, on 07 February 2014 - 05:59 AM, said:
Fun Fact: UI2.0 forces a fixed perspective in the mechlab. Now we can accurately compare mech sizes with side by sides! Things I've noticed: the Griffin and Shadowhawk are almost the same size as the Victor (and the same size / slightly larger than most Heavy mechs). The Locust is not significantly smaller than a Jenner (the only real difference being that the Jenner has more of a 'nose' than the Locust).
The cannon arm on the Centurion (meant to carry an AC/10) is smaller than the cannon arm on the Highlander (meant to carry Gauss / AC/20).
A Cicada compared to a Jenner is hilarious.
Re-ignite the debate!
This whole thing is one of the single most frustrating things about this game for me.
We've all said it enough times, they've touched on it during ATD's, they just refuse to fix it because of whatever amount of time and resources it takes to rescale a mech.
I'm at the point where I'd settle for one mech per month being rescaled. It would take forever, but at least it would be in process.
But the ABSOLUTE worst part, is they CONTINUE to do it. I don't understand it at all. They know the scaling is fubar, but they keep repeating the same mistakes.