Jump to content

[Build] Jester


88 replies to this topic

#41 Hex Pallett

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 2,009 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationHomeless, in the streets of Solaris 7

Posted 06 November 2013 - 10:11 PM

I've replaced ERLL with regular ones.

OH BOI.

#42 DrSlamastika

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 702 posts
  • LocationSlovakia

Posted 07 November 2013 - 05:08 AM

:) of course ERLL are hot like hell . . . .

#43 -Muta-

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 749 posts
  • Locationstill remains a mistery.

Posted 07 November 2013 - 05:26 AM

View PostEldagore, on 05 November 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

I am curious what a 97kph catapult would ride like. Not curious enough to buy MC though. Maybe if I am impressed by UI 2.0 in a few weeks.


He will ride waaaaaaay slower than my TDK

#44 Macbrea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hunter
  • The Hunter
  • 270 posts

Posted 07 November 2013 - 05:31 AM

This is what I have been running. I am trying to decide if I can afford to go up to a 325xl or 350xl engine at the loss of heat sinks. They would be moved from the body to the engine, but I think I would still end up losing heat efficiency.

CPLT-J (315xl, 47% heat eff, 3000AMS)
CPLT-J (325xl, 44% heat eff, 3000AMS)
CPLT-J (350xl, 42% heat eff, 2000AMS)

What I have discovered is I use about 2500 AMS ammo on a good match.

Also: What modules are people running. I now have it mastered, so 3 module slots.

In case, anyone is wondering and says you will never kill anyone with that build...
MECHMatchesWinsLossesW/L RatioKillsDeaths K/D RatioDamage
CATAPULT CPLT-C119 109 1.113 14 0.21 2,776
CATAPULT CPLT-A196 4452 0.852478 0.3113,654
CATAPULT CPLT-K2210961140.84721730.4238,890
CATAPULT CPLT-C41043964 0.612585 0.2913,453
CATAPULT CPLT-J 27 1611 1.451820 0.90 6,810

Edited by Macbrea, 07 November 2013 - 07:41 AM.


#45 NRP

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 3,949 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 07 November 2013 - 07:08 AM

View PostHelmstif, on 06 November 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:

I've replaced ERLL with regular ones.

OH BOI.

Heh, I've gone the other way and swapped regular LLs for ERLLs. I'm finding the added range helpful. I'm also very close to eliting it, so that should help a bit.

#46 DrSlamastika

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 702 posts
  • LocationSlovakia

Posted 07 November 2013 - 11:38 AM

View PostMacbrea, on 07 November 2013 - 05:31 AM, said:

This is what I have been running. I am trying to decide if I can afford to go up to a 325xl or 350xl engine at the loss of heat sinks. They would be moved from the body to the engine, but I think I would still end up losing heat efficiency.

CPLT-J (315xl, 47% heat eff, 3000AMS)
CPLT-J (325xl, 44% heat eff, 3000AMS)
CPLT-J (350xl, 42% heat eff, 2000AMS)

What I have discovered is I use about 2500 AMS ammo on a good match.

Also: What modules are people running. I now have it mastered, so 3 module slots.

In case, anyone is wondering and says you will never kill anyone with that build...
MECHMatchesWinsLossesW/L RatioKillsDeaths K/D RatioDamage
CATAPULT CPLT-C119 109 1.113 14 0.21 2,776
CATAPULT CPLT-A196 4452 0.852478 0.3113,654
CATAPULT CPLT-K2210961140.84721730.4238,890
CATAPULT CPLT-C41043964 0.612585 0.2913,453
CATAPULT CPLT-J 27 1611 1.451820 0.90 6,810





Thats not very good stats, probably cose you using XL engines too much ;)

3000 AMS ammo is too much I think, better you do if you will swap 1 ton for 1 heatsink or something . .

Edited by DrSlamastika, 07 November 2013 - 11:43 AM.


#47 Macbrea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hunter
  • The Hunter
  • 270 posts

Posted 07 November 2013 - 01:33 PM

The majority of my deaths come from center torso destroyed, 95% of the time. In those 27 matches on the jester I only once got left torso destroyed. XL engines definitely aren't the issue. And you will notice my stats on the CPLT-J are quite a bit better then the other ones. I listed them to give people a baseline. If you see me walk into your game on your side in a C4 we are going to lose. There is nothing you can do about it... ;)

And on the AMS ammo.. As I stated. a good match will burn through it all even at 3k ammo. Two launchers can go through 1k in about a minute.

Edited by Macbrea, 07 November 2013 - 01:36 PM.


#48 Deathz Jester

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,107 posts
  • LocationOH, USA

Posted 07 November 2013 - 01:53 PM

View PostEldagore, on 05 November 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

I am curious what a 97kph catapult would ride like. Not curious enough to buy MC though. Maybe if I am impressed by UI 2.0 in a few weeks.


lol a few weeks? they're talking about 2014 now. so you might as well buy the jester now

#49 Zarlaren

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • LocationRoseburg

Posted 07 November 2013 - 02:10 PM

Jester will be my first Hero mech i'll be getting. Jesters has been tearing up the battlefields and I'm very impressed with there performance. Though I'm saving C-Bills for the K2 to practice till I get her. But in the mean time I'm researching for some awesome Jester builds. I was wondering if your can take off the JJ's for more heatsinks to keep her more cool?

#50 Macbrea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hunter
  • The Hunter
  • 270 posts

Posted 07 November 2013 - 02:51 PM

You don't want to take off the JJs. Honestly, it's a huge advantage on this mech.

#51 ShortBusBully

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 49 posts
  • LocationAZ

Posted 07 November 2013 - 03:40 PM

View PostMacbrea, on 07 November 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:

The majority of my deaths come from center torso destroyed, 95% of the time. In those 27 matches on the jester I only once got left torso destroyed. XL engines definitely aren't the issue. And you will notice my stats on the CPLT-J are quite a bit better then the other ones. I listed them to give people a baseline. If you see me walk into your game on your side in a C4 we are going to lose. There is nothing you can do about it... ;)

And on the AMS ammo.. As I stated. a good match will burn through it all even at 3k ammo. Two launchers can go through 1k in about a minute.


Maybe I will give it a try when I can get my MC back up. Not working right now so im free gaming it for awhile. But when I was in K2 I got my side torsos blown off more than once. Granted not as much as other mechs. Maybe our play styles are different. But it sounds like it might be worth a try

#52 Geek Verve

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 293 posts
  • LocationCentral Indiana, USA

Posted 08 November 2013 - 08:20 AM

View PostDirtyC, on 07 November 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:


Maybe I will give it a try when I can get my MC back up. Not working right now so im free gaming it for awhile. But when I was in K2 I got my side torsos blown off more than once. Granted not as much as other mechs. Maybe our play styles are different. But it sounds like it might be worth a try

I typically run only one ton of ammo for each AMS, but in today's LRM-happy environment, more is better.

ST destruction on Cats with an XL engine has always been a problem for me. The ST's are pretty small from head-on, but they're easy to hit from the side. As such I tend to favor PPC's (I only play the Jester and the K2 - just not a big LRM guy), because the large barrel provides some protection for them. It's not quite as important on the Jester, as the higher speed certainly helps. I find the XL almost a requirement for a Catapult. The 300 seems to be the sweet spot for me.

#53 NRP

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 3,949 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 08 November 2013 - 08:39 AM

View PostZarla, on 07 November 2013 - 02:10 PM, said:

Jester will be my first Hero mech i'll be getting. Jesters has been tearing up the battlefields and I'm very impressed with there performance. Though I'm saving C-Bills for the K2 to practice till I get her. But in the mean time I'm researching for some awesome Jester builds. I was wondering if your can take off the JJ's for more heatsinks to keep her more cool?

This is a bad idea imo. JJs are what makes the Jester unique. If you aren't going to use them, just get a K2 instead.

#54 Macbrea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hunter
  • The Hunter
  • 270 posts

Posted 08 November 2013 - 10:10 AM

CPLT-J (350xl, 42% heat eff, 2000AMS)

I ended up going with this as my variant on a couple of different things. First I had the 315XL engine in my K2 and didn't want two totally identical mechs. The increase in speed also effects both torso twist and the ability to run along closely behind the lights. This means on things like Terra Therma where the lights run off to cap, I arrive shortly after then have engaged the target at whatever check point they went to. I am kind of heavy back-up for them.

#55 levitas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Virulent
  • The Virulent
  • 266 posts

Posted 09 November 2013 - 10:09 AM

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...4ccbba9b5f5076f

I've been having a lot of fun with this build. With speed tweak you can stomp around as fast as most mediums (capping with this build is totally doable), PPCs and jump jets are always nice, and 4MLs are solid.

I find that 1 JJ is enough to peek/poptart/climb whatever I've needed to, though I could comfortably throw another JJ in and ditch a ton of AMS ammo.

This build feels more rounded out than a similar build which dropped the AMS altogether and went for an XL350. Without the AMS, this game wouldn't have been possible:
Posted Image

I find PPCs to be much easier to wield than ERPPCs both for heat reasons and due to the fact that I'm a stupid unwashed PUG and other PUGs tend to walk into my line of fire when I'm shooting PPCs before I see them.

Last note: I cut only a little leg armor and some side torso, which may have been foolish. If it's more your style, cutting a bit more leg armor and bumping up the ST armor might increase your jester's durability.

Edited by solar levitas, 09 November 2013 - 10:11 AM.


#56 Kaeseblock

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 258 posts
  • LocationEU / Deutschland

Posted 13 November 2013 - 11:48 AM

Tinkered around a bit and came up with this strange JESTER build.

Funny fact: Avoid brawls and fire 2xPPC-wait-1xPPC and the heat is actually managable (even on Terra Therma). I usually am among the top dmg ranks and get some kills.

The 2xERLL 4ML JESTER build is usually better, but 3xPPC 2ML is definitely fun to play ^^ (and deals pinpoint dmg ;) )

#57 guniits

    Rookie

  • 4 posts
  • LocationLatvia

Posted 18 November 2013 - 02:55 AM

after i will get 1kk cbils i will try this out

http://mwo.smurfy-ne...e4b9a68ef398a92

Edited by guniits, 18 November 2013 - 03:04 AM.


#58 guniits

    Rookie

  • 4 posts
  • LocationLatvia

Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:35 AM

something fishy is with that site,acording to them for that upper build i must had 40% heat eff but i have only 27%

Posted ImageUploaded with ImageShack.com

Edited by guniits, 18 November 2013 - 04:49 AM.


#59 Geek Verve

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 293 posts
  • LocationCentral Indiana, USA

Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:56 AM

The two merely use a different scales to represent the same thing is all. MWO uses a 2-point rating system, while Smurfy's uses a percentage.

#60 NRP

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 3,949 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 18 November 2013 - 02:15 PM

I've had a great deal of success with the ERLL/ML build, but I'm finding this build lacks the burst damage needed to compete against higher skilled opponents. So I'm thinking of going back to a 2PPC/4 ML build. I'll need to drop the AMS and downgrade the engine in order to keep 19 DHS though.

Now that I assume most of you have also mastered your Jesters, does anyone have any better ideas? I really love this mech, I just wish it had more punch.





5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users