Which Jager For Dual Ac/20's?
#1
Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:33 AM
#2
Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:39 AM
#3
Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:39 AM
#4
Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:58 AM
The Firebrand has slightly less torso turn but only by 10% and the c-bill boost makes it pretty lucrative if you can afford one.
The 6-DD and 6-S are identical except for hardpoint but both will run dual AC20s just fine. Note that the DD comes with an XL260 engine so if you want to keep that stock XL260, buy the DD.
Here's a sample build using that stock XL260 and with a pair of Mlas for backup http://mwo.smurfy-ne...813d70119b1309c The Mlas are not mandatory, some players prefer bringing more ammo or heatsinks instead. It's also pretty well-armoured and some players go for more of a glass cannon (less armor for more ammo, heatsinks, etc)
Edited by Redshift2k5, 30 November 2013 - 12:02 PM.
#5
Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:58 AM
#6
Posted 30 November 2013 - 12:06 PM
JM6-S is a good 'mech for other builds.
JM6-FB costs real money, but works well for the job.
Go with the JM6-DD. Same performance characteristics as the S, but fewer viable builds. Unless you want to do something silly with MGs or AC/2s.
#7
Posted 30 November 2013 - 12:46 PM
#9
Posted 30 November 2013 - 02:24 PM
#10
Posted 30 November 2013 - 02:26 PM
Khajja nar Jatargk, on 30 November 2013 - 02:24 PM, said:
Bring some ERLL and saw them in half beyond their functional range. Or a 6 ML Jenner to burn a hole in their rear side torsos and blow their XLs.
I can be annoying to fight a lance full of them but it really is a hot, short range, vulnerable-from-the-rear kind of build.
#12
Posted 30 November 2013 - 03:32 PM
#13
Posted 30 November 2013 - 03:46 PM
Redshift2k5, on 30 November 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:
Bring some ERLL and saw them in half beyond their functional range. Or a 6 ML Jenner to burn a hole in their rear side torsos and blow their XLs.
I can be annoying to fight a lance full of them but it really is a hot, short range, vulnerable-from-the-rear kind of build.
Lance? the current seen record stands at eight
#14
Posted 30 November 2013 - 03:50 PM
If you chainfire them you will be much more heat-efficient. firing two at the same time (or less than .5 seconds apart) will incur a heat penalty.
sometimes it will be worth firing two together if you can make a killshot or otherwise cripple your target, but be wary of firing both when your heat is high. A powered-down AC40 Jager is a toothless wolf.
#17
Posted 30 November 2013 - 06:51 PM
Khajja nar Jatargk, on 30 November 2013 - 03:46 PM, said:
Lance? the current seen record stands at eight
Our unit ran a 12 man of them once, just for stupidities sake. Surprisingly, it wasn't as effective as you'd imagine. We did some damage, but a lot got blown at long range before they could do anything. I think our 12 Spider run got more kills. But Spiders were extra dodgy at that point.
#18
Posted 30 November 2013 - 07:11 PM
#19
Posted 30 November 2013 - 07:41 PM
#20
Posted 30 November 2013 - 10:57 PM
knightsljx, on 30 November 2013 - 07:41 PM, said:
On the contrary, a standard engine boomjager is often the best boomjager. Esp. with the huge jager side torsos!
Edited by Victor Morson, 30 November 2013 - 10:57 PM.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users