The 733C And You
#1
Posted 10 December 2013 - 08:36 AM
How do you build yours? And isn't it just the best Mech ever made? I think it is; unfairly so. It's only counter imo is a Stalker with ER larges at range on significantly higher / lower ground.
tl;dr; itt: we profess our undying love for the poptarting bar steward meta and discuss our favourite ways to enforce PGI's preferred play style.
#2
Posted 10 December 2013 - 09:09 AM
1er llarge
Ac20
srm6
Lrmr15
BAP
DHS
XL300 I think?
#3
Posted 10 December 2013 - 11:31 AM
AC20
3xSRM6
LL + ERLL
max armor, DHS, Endosteel.
It's designed to be played with a strategy of jumping over obstacles sneak 90 tons in behind an opponent to start a brawl. It's fun.
#4
Posted 10 December 2013 - 12:01 PM
#6
Posted 10 December 2013 - 12:10 PM
Ngamok, on 10 December 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:
It's actually quite impressive how you managed to use most of the tonnage there, nice build. I couldn't help but notice that you were missing something though, this build has a slightly faster missile lock on time:
HGN-733C Quik Lokk
#10
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:17 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 11 December 2013 - 06:20 AM, said:
I'm loving a similar build but with 2x extra ML, faster and a lot less DHS/ammo
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...7d8eaa4dff38a24
Edited by Maverick27, 11 December 2013 - 07:19 AM.
#11
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:35 AM
#13
Posted 11 December 2013 - 11:56 AM
RickySpanish, on 11 December 2013 - 07:35 AM, said:
XL on an Atlas was his first problem...and then gauss with an XL, even worse.
#14
Posted 11 December 2013 - 02:01 PM
MacKoga, on 10 December 2013 - 11:31 AM, said:
AC20
3xSRM6
LL + ERLL
max armor, DHS, Endosteel.
It's designed to be played with a strategy of jumping over obstacles sneak 90 tons in behind an opponent to start a brawl. It's fun.
How do you make all this fit, and still keep it from overheating? Can you post a Smurfy's link?
I currently run mine as follows:
XL325
AC/20 (4T)
2 LLs
3 streaks (2T)
BAP
2 JJs
16 DHS, 512 armor
#15
Posted 11 December 2013 - 02:35 PM
Doesn't run cool at all, though.
This would be better, IMO: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...6f1fa5d2322aa94
Edited by zagibu, 11 December 2013 - 02:43 PM.
#16
Posted 11 December 2013 - 02:51 PM
It's still more or less meta compliant. :-/
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users