Twitter Pics Of Wolverine And Griffin!
#41
Posted 11 December 2013 - 02:16 AM
#42
Posted 11 December 2013 - 02:23 AM
#43
Posted 11 December 2013 - 04:49 AM
Twitter puts it up fast, people get updates about it and there isn't another post complaining about (insert random thing here) pushing it off the top.
I'm not a fan of it either, but that is what happens when you have a production company above your dev company.
#44
Posted 11 December 2013 - 05:01 AM
Deathlike, on 10 December 2013 - 05:03 PM, said:
http://mwomercs.com/...specifications/
Unless it is inaccurate, the 3M is a missile/streak/optimal ASRM boat, not energy.
I hope they are inaccurate. I hoped, taht with 3 55ton mechs comming out, each having three versions at least ONE would be like a 55ton HBK-SP, i.e. symetrical with 2 energy slots per arm.
#45
Posted 11 December 2013 - 05:33 AM
Deathlike, on 10 December 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:
If it's going to be standard engine friendly, it needs some kind of zombie mode weapon (head/CT) to really shine.
#46
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:47 AM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...95043c3c565f309
Only 10 missile tubes, so using a srm 6 and 4 to get an alpha that dosent go in 2 volleys (cuz that looks so bad!)
No reason not to use XL engine, if u lose right side with a std engine u are weaponless..
Did first plan to go for the wolvie but i dont like its "new" look: but i would be something like this:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...0b1c35a1b414f7a
#47
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:54 AM
Barantor, on 10 December 2013 - 12:48 PM, said:
http://t.co/9P70F17iM1
http://t.co/oyaRJgw71X
Evidently the image extension of that url isn't allowed... even though twitter is how they put them out...
No worries, now they are on imgur!
it maybe just the picture but the wolverines head should be bigger its so tinny i like to see another picture
#48
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:03 AM
Carrioncrows, on 11 December 2013 - 12:36 AM, said:
Tell me this isn't beautiful.
http://goo.gl/JzjhOk
Of course the SRM 6 would actually be x2 srm2's because the site is messed up but that's swanky stuff man.
appears to be lacking srm ammo. Plenty for the streaks though!
[GRF-3M]: 2xPPC, 3xSSRM2, 300XL, DHS, Endo
#49
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:05 AM
MonkeyCheese, on 11 December 2013 - 02:23 AM, said:
They do have them posted in a sneak peak on the Upcoming features forum. Don't know about the timing though.
#50
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:34 AM
DeadlyFred, on 10 December 2013 - 06:43 PM, said:
Yes, that's why the Locust (as currently constituted) is great right?
I know there's more to mechs than just min-maxing, but there are known quantities like the Shadowhawk, Centurion, and Trebuchet to base an opinion on to predict how it would fare. I mean, we have a thread on how the Trebuchet is pretty much MIA. Min-maxing doesn't tell the entire story as to the obvious reasons why.
I'm not telling you that can't enjoy the mech, but to not say there isn't a potential deficiency... well, feel free to ignore it. Opinions are allowed to change, but don't be too quick to think that defending a bad design is a good thing long term. We'll see one way or another whether it is a good or not.
Bromineberry, on 11 December 2013 - 05:01 AM, said:
I hope they are inaccurate. I hoped, taht with 3 55ton mechs comming out, each having three versions at least ONE would be like a 55ton HBK-SP, i.e. symetrical with 2 energy slots per arm.
Wishful thinking there.
Edited by Deathlike, 11 December 2013 - 08:44 AM.
#51
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:37 AM
#53
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:41 AM
Edited by Will9761, 11 December 2013 - 08:52 AM.
#54
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:42 AM
MonkeyCheese, on 11 December 2013 - 02:23 AM, said:
This right here!
I personally dont use twitter or facebook and im not about to change my stance on that.
However the website should be the central place for all content relating to development and if its gonna be on twitter at least include it onto the MWO website. A good example of this is the turret thread.
But we shouldnt have to rely on other sites for information about mwo. If its related to mwo then drop it on the site guys
#55
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:42 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 10 December 2013 - 09:52 PM, said:
Agreed. I must confess that I wasn't totally enamoured with the concept art but my first thought upon seeing the screenshot of the Griffin was, "My word, that's a good looking 'mech!"
Sod the hardpoints, I'm going to make the Griffin work even if it kills me. Which it probably will... over and over again .
#56
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:57 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 10 December 2013 - 09:52 PM, said:
The Griffin is also known to be the Lyran Commonwealth's favorite mech. That is why two of them guard the Archon's place. So I might paint my Standard Griffins the same colors as the Lyran Royal Guards.
#57
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:58 AM
So
big
#60
Posted 11 December 2013 - 10:02 AM
Jody Von Jedi, on 11 December 2013 - 09:30 AM, said:
Can you point me to that thread? I can't find it. Trebuchet is my favorite mech. I need to defend her honor.
Jody Von Jedi
http://mwomercs.com/...-the-trebuchet/
There is nothing to defend. Most of the variants are OK at best, with the 7K being the best of the worst... except it has been already exceeded by the Shadowhawk-5M.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users