Jump to content

Larger Lrm Sizes


41 replies to this topic

#41 Satan n stuff

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 3,508 posts
  • LocationLooking right at you, lining up my shot.

Posted 22 December 2013 - 03:24 AM

View PostRoadkill, on 13 December 2013 - 11:22 AM, said:

For the most part I agree with you.

The only wrench in that is that on a big boat Artemis might be too heavy, while TAG might still fit. I have that problem on my BLR-1S (because at the moment I'm too cheap to buy it an XL), so I'm running 4 x LRM-15 with TAG. Once I feel like paying for another XL I'll have the tonnage to add Artemis, but I won't be dropping the TAG to do it.

Also, I get into a LOT of matches where there's no other TAG on my side. So at least for my Elo rating, self-TAG on an LRM boat is pretty much mandatory in order to get that bonus.

If you can't fit artemis on a big boat you'll want to lower your missile count a bit to make it fit, the benefit of artemis is worth more than those extra missiles. With quad 15s you can switch to 2 15s and 2 10s to give you enough free weight. I myself use that config on the 1S because it matches the tube count.

#42 FerrolupisXIII

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Caladbolg
  • Caladbolg
  • 502 posts
  • LocationCatapult Cockpit

Posted 22 December 2013 - 12:12 PM

View PostMr 144, on 20 December 2013 - 08:08 AM, said:


No really...I'm very open to discussion...link you're thread 'cause I musta missed it if you don't wanna cross. I just don't understand why you would leave yourself sucepitble to a single ECM light shut-down without BAP if you want any legitimate LRM contribution. Notice, I did not say primary contribution....just serious contribution.

The post I quoted was in response to "targeting" mechs inside of the ECM bubble....and for THAT reason, I agree it's dumb. The point still remains that BAP is a "defensive" measure against being shut-down by a light while targeting in a distance.


http://mwomercs.com/...87#entry2913787

there you go. more than a few LOL you're dumb posts, unfortunately.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users