Jump to content

The Jettison Of My Topic Was Completely Unjustified. Please, Move It Back Where It Belongs.

Contact Support

15 replies to this topic

#1 BlackIronTarkus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 357 posts
  • LocationBehind you, breathing on your neck.

Posted 20 December 2013 - 11:38 AM

Hello.

Recently I posted a topic about game balance. The introduction was humorous and it involved me, blackIronTarkus, which is a hidden character of another game that can solo bosses. It basically said that I one maned the piranha studio and got control of it. (which is obviously not real, because you know it involve a character that doesn't exist).

After that it described how I would personally allocate developers on tasks that I believe should be the priority of mechwarrior online and thus improve the game or give players what they have been asking for since closed beta. (consider this whole part suggestions)

Then I listed the changes I would make to the game in a relatively soon future, which in essence are also suggestions for changes that are long due or the community have been asking for since a while now.

The thread spawned some replies which were ALL positives and polities.

There is no justification to jettison my topic, it was in the right forum, it wasn't offensive, it was constructive and humorous. Plus it took me 2-3 hours to make it. (the researches, the pictures and finally writing it)

The thread: http://mwomercs.com/...61#entry3010361

PS; I said half-humorous in the title because the patch note are very serious balance suggestions and the introduction is obviously a joke.

thank you.

#2 DONTOR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,806 posts
  • LocationStuck on a piece of Commando in my Ice Ferret

Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:59 PM

ummm ok?

#3 BlackIronTarkus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 357 posts
  • LocationBehind you, breathing on your neck.

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:48 AM

Bump for justice!

#4 PanzerMagier

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 1,369 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSome nameless backwater planet

Posted 22 December 2013 - 09:24 AM

Decent patch update, too much favoritism. I'd first like to hear the community's opinion on making an ingame poll system on some of the patch changes.
But other than that I'd still like to see PGI make a decent patch update. these guys just fail miserably when the word "deliver" is involved.

#5 Hexenhammer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,729 posts
  • LocationKAETETôã

Posted 22 December 2013 - 11:42 AM

Wont belong before this one joins the other one.

#6 Appogee

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 10,966 posts
  • LocationOn planet Tukayyid, celebrating victory

Posted 22 December 2013 - 12:02 PM

The moderators love it when someone creates a new thread about an old thread they already dealt with. :P

#7 Hexenhammer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,729 posts
  • LocationKAETETôã

Posted 22 December 2013 - 02:51 PM

View PostAppogee, on 22 December 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:

The moderators love it when someone creates a new thread about an old thread they already dealt with. :P



more so when its just a complaint about why the first one was moved.

The trick with snark is when to and not to use it.

#8 Icould

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • 87 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 03:24 PM

Hint: PGI doesn't care what this community thinks (see 3pv and $500 gold mech cash grab).

If you want to be involved with a game development that is intelligent, sensible and efficient please go to Star Citizen. You should have already learned your lesson about what PGI/IGP is about.

I'll never understand why people think PGI would have any sense to listen to constructive suggestions. Didn't the smartest people on these forums (who have since uninstalled the game) tell PGI to leave the game in Beta? What did PGI do? Seriously, let this game die.

Edited by Icould, 22 December 2013 - 03:25 PM.


#9 Vanguard319

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,436 posts
  • LocationTerra

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:51 PM

View PostIcould, on 22 December 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:

Hint: PGI doesn't care what this community thinks (see 3pv and $500 gold mech cash grab).


Which is why PGI is offering individual clan mechs after the community asked for it, but that must be coincidence since they "don't care what the community thinks." (sarcasm)

Edited by Vanguard319, 22 December 2013 - 08:51 PM.


#10 Appogee

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 10,966 posts
  • LocationOn planet Tukayyid, celebrating victory

Posted 22 December 2013 - 09:22 PM

View PostIcould, on 22 December 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:

Seriously, let this game die.

Some MechWarrior is better than no MechWarrior. Where there are Mechs, there is hope.

Personally, I've stopped spending, and I keep telling them what they'll need to provide in order to start me spending again. I think when the cashflow starts to trickle, they'll realise that the calls for CW and more maps and modes can't be further ignored.

Edited by Appogee, 23 December 2013 - 02:30 AM.


#11 Levon K

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 324 posts
  • LocationToronto

Posted 22 December 2013 - 11:35 PM

The OP's original thread is what happens when one lives in the center of his own universe.

Seriously bro, it was mildly entertaining, but to suggest that PGI has everything ***-backwards and you could fix everything in one patch is a little arrogant and quite hubric.

The mods did everyone a favour moving it to K-Town. Unfortunately, mocking the hard-working Devs on this project has become too much of a pass-time for the less respectable members of this community.

#12 Rushin Roulette

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 3,514 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 23 December 2013 - 01:28 AM

Would give the original post a 6/10 (marked up because you showed that you made an effort)

This one however maybe a 2/10

Edited by Rushin Roulette, 23 December 2013 - 02:46 AM.


#13 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 23 December 2013 - 01:55 AM

Maybe if you removed the content that makes you look prejudicial and applied your concerns using an objective viewpoint?

Depends where you want to best invest efforts I guess, insulting others or improving MWO?

#14 Deathz Jester

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,107 posts
  • LocationOH, USA

Posted 23 December 2013 - 02:35 AM

Balance.... and yet you're named after a Darksouls character.....

#15 Iqfish

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,488 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationGermany, CGN

Posted 23 December 2013 - 03:04 AM

That content + images obviously made fun of PGI and it's employees, it totally deserved to be removed.

Edited by IqfishLP, 23 December 2013 - 03:04 AM.


#16 Ransack

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,175 posts

Posted 23 December 2013 - 12:12 PM

View PostIqfishLP, on 23 December 2013 - 03:04 AM, said:

That content + images obviously made fun of PGI and it's employees, it totally deserved to be removed.


That thread will remain a permanent resident of JC.

Be happy that it didn't go to Far country.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users