![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/merc-corps.png)
Advanced Tutorial: No-Win Situations (Subject To Debate)
#61
Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:57 AM
#62
Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:43 PM
Nyel86, on 13 January 2014 - 05:55 PM, said:
That you win or lose as a team.
Quote
Let's take a look:
Xavier Wulf, on 04 January 2014 - 07:16 PM, said:
oldradagast, on 06 January 2014 - 11:37 AM, said:
Nyel86, on 10 January 2014 - 08:57 AM, said:
#63
Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:48 PM
Sigifrid, on 13 January 2014 - 05:55 PM, said:
If you cannot communicate with the other squads effectively, is it possible to actively coordinate with them? The answer is no: you can lay out a basic plan with them, but plans have a habit of not surviving contact with the enemy. The best teamwork can only be achieved within a set number of players that can actively communicate. In the PuG queues, that number is 4 players.
You seem to be under the impression, that voicecom is needed for teamplay. That is not true. Teamplay becomes way more effective with voicecom, true. That does not mean, however, that you should not or can not work with teammates who you can't talk to. You don't even have to use chat for basic teamwork!
#65
Posted 14 January 2014 - 09:24 PM
Your feedback stopped being feedback or relevant a long time ago.
I'm trying to help the community, you are trying to troll the community. Read the Code of Conduct.
Primus of ComStar said:
Our definition of Unconstructive / Spamming includes:
- Posting Off-Topic replies.
http://mwomercs.com/...nduct-expanded/
Please stop posting here.
#66
Posted 14 January 2014 - 11:15 PM
Hoaggie, on 09 January 2014 - 06:54 PM, said:
Yes you can if you want
![:ph34r:](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
Thanks for the video, i like the off-comments which bring it to the point. Also your video about Moving, Shooting and communicating has important comments most of us easily do not stick to during fight. Many know it, only few translate it into proper action. So thanks again.
Edited by Al Bert, 15 January 2014 - 12:01 AM.
#67
Posted 15 January 2014 - 07:01 AM
John Branon, on 14 January 2014 - 07:48 PM, said:
You seem to be under the impression, that voicecom is needed for teamplay. That is not true. Teamplay becomes way more effective with voicecom, true. That does not mean, however, that you should not or can not work with teammates who you can't talk to. You don't even have to use chat for basic teamwork!
Alright then, do you know /why/ we were in the cave?
Its not mentioned in the video because it was not relevant to the purpose of this video, but the purpose is to pincer the enemy team... now tell me how this is not teamplay? The plan failed as is prone to happen and clear communication salvaged the situation, which is the point being made by the video.
Engage your brain a little before responding next time.
#68
Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:35 PM
Hoaggie, on 13 January 2014 - 09:02 PM, said:
You make a point that people before you made, and it is far too late for me to change the title in the forums, if you actually looked you would see that I have changed the video name on youtube, but IMHO nine out of ten lances walking into that cave would not have done as well as we did. Even on voice coms, even knowing what was coming.
Have to totally disagree with the humble opinion here.
There are plenty of 4 man's teams who not only do what you guys did in that cave but do it not losing a single member of the lance.
Kudos for making the changes of the title.
Keep helping the community, nothing wrong with that.
Edited by GRiPSViGiL, 22 January 2014 - 09:36 PM.
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users