Bring Back The Cn9-Ah!
#201
Posted 18 May 2014 - 08:44 PM
*bump*
#203
Posted 18 May 2014 - 11:00 PM
#204
Posted 18 May 2014 - 11:08 PM
Koniving, on 13 May 2014 - 10:54 AM, said:
I wasn't quite as fortunate though. I was leading MGs like a moron, and we had on/off chances of hitting while leading with delayed fire from the ACs and while leading, convergence was about impossible to make work.
On second thought, it was a silly mech. Don't bring it back.
(trying reverse psychology here, bear with me)
#205
Posted 18 May 2014 - 11:49 PM
Kmieciu, on 18 May 2014 - 11:08 PM, said:
(trying reverse psychology here, bear with me)
(reverse activated)
Yeah you are right - as far as i can remember the CN9-AH was very very ill. No energy weapons...and the SRMs were as hot - had ammunition and did weight 4 times of a single Medium Laser.
Only idiots will drive a AH. PGI has to do better than changing there in game values.
Edited by Karl Streiger, 18 May 2014 - 11:49 PM.
#206
Posted 19 May 2014 - 07:39 AM
I wonder if we'll ever see "classic" patterns/paint.
The closed beta ones.
#207
Posted 19 May 2014 - 08:16 AM
#freeCN9AH
#208
Posted 19 May 2014 - 08:36 AM
#209
Posted 19 May 2014 - 08:49 AM
Karl Streiger, on 18 May 2014 - 11:49 PM, said:
Yeah you are right - as far as i can remember the CN9-AH was very very ill. No energy weapons...and the SRMs were as hot - had ammunition and did weight 4 times of a single Medium Laser.
Only idiots will drive a AH. PGI has to do better than changing there in game values.
At that time all the Cents seemed pretty fragile. Personally, if you forget the standard engine zombie, you can do a 250XL with an AC20 with 3 tons ammo, 2 SRM6 with 3 tons ammo and have a 42 alpha at 90 KPH. I think it would do well enough to stop any more sales of the Yen.
#210
Posted 19 May 2014 - 09:20 AM
Please PGI ? For those of us that never had the privilege of owning/piloting one, please bring back the CN9-AH !!
Pretty please with sugar on top.......
#freeCN9AH
#211
Posted 19 May 2014 - 09:39 AM
cdlord, on 19 May 2014 - 08:36 AM, said:
Ever better, I'd like to go 3 AC/2s + Missiles, or AC/10 + Mgs + missiles. It had 3 ballistic slots and 2 missile.
Foxwalker, on 19 May 2014 - 08:49 AM, said:
I'm not so sure. PGI was pretty keen to make it slower than the others. I remember a 225 limit on it.
#212
Posted 20 May 2014 - 01:30 PM
#freeCN9-AH
#213
Posted 20 May 2014 - 06:00 PM
It's like you're just making fun of us at this point!
Edited by Bagheera, 20 May 2014 - 06:00 PM.
#214
Posted 22 May 2014 - 09:47 AM
LET IT TRY THEM
#215
Posted 22 May 2014 - 10:40 AM
#216
Posted 27 May 2014 - 03:16 AM
People are now saying that the FLEA was the placeholder mech for the LOCUST and that the FLEA will never be added into the game because it IS the locust! This CN9-AH incident has set a terrible precedent! People think this is acceptable! It is not!
We will post for the CN9-AH!
We will post for the flea!
We will post until we are banned or can not otherwise post!
Show your surport and love for the forgotten mech! We remember! We care!
Edited by GrandLocomon, 27 May 2014 - 03:17 AM.
#217
Posted 27 May 2014 - 03:41 PM
PGI you are fighting a PR war with your players whether you like it or not. re-releasing the -AH into the wild will win you favor with the vets and bring some positivity back to the community and once again generate more buzz for the medium mechs, a lot more then a new hero will. it is a boon for you, a win for the community, a potent chassis for newer players, and requires little investment from your staff to re-implement, please PGI, free the CN9-AH.
Edited by raigner, 27 May 2014 - 03:44 PM.
#218
Posted 27 May 2014 - 04:04 PM
In fact, by providing the CN9-AH, not only do they provide more options, but they remove the still whispered P2W arguments, because there is now a free to play version capable of packing the AC20.
#219
Posted 27 May 2014 - 07:01 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 27 May 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:
In fact, by providing the CN9-AH, not only do they provide more options, but they remove the still whispered P2W arguments, because there is now a free to play version capable of packing the AC20.
I never said we should not have both. In fact i greatly hope we do, and that PGI will admit that these two mechs are not mutually exclusive. Quiaff?
Edited by raigner, 27 May 2014 - 07:02 PM.
#220
Posted 27 May 2014 - 07:25 PM
raigner, on 27 May 2014 - 07:01 PM, said:
when did I say you did? Were I referencing you, I would have quoted you, good sir. But I fully concur.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 27 May 2014 - 07:25 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users