Jump to content

The Etiquette Of "gg"


262 replies to this topic

#181 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 03:49 PM

View PostHelbrecht, on 20 February 2014 - 02:22 PM, said:

So let me get this straight im paranoid by saying i dont ever need to see a opposing teams chat?

No - you are being paranoid if you believe that the other team has nothing useful or positive to offer you.

Thank you for proving my points.

#182 Naduk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,575 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 20 February 2014 - 03:58 PM

its not about if the game was the best you ever had or even if you won or lost

its about being a good sportsman
at the end of every sporting match here is Australia, both teams will shake each others hands and commend each other on their efforts , even if you hate the other teams guts or just one guy you still shake their hand

GG or good game, is the summary of this type of action
i cannot shake your hand after every match, but i can say thank you for showing up and being my opponent
for with out you the opponent there would be no game for me to play

it has nothing to do with how the game plays out either
i have been on as many stompped teams as anyone else
but even some of those were amazing games, my team getting stomped was either putting up one hell of a defense against a massive onslaught or we made a crazy banzai charge into the enemy when they did not expect it
you know the games im talking about, where even tho it was you who got stomped 12-0 it was an amazing game

but GG is not just for amazing games
when you say GG on a defeat, you say "i have lost, i acknowledge my defeat and your superior skill or tactics this day, next we meet you shall be tested"
on a victory GG says "i have attained glory this day, tho it would not have been possible with out my opponent, honor to the fallen"

so you see , it is a respect thing
much in the same way o7 has been catching on
(the "o" is a head and the "7" is an arm, thus the salute emoticon was born)
"we who are about to die salute you"

Edited by Naduk, 20 February 2014 - 04:02 PM.


#183 Helbrecht

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 132 posts

Posted 20 February 2014 - 04:54 PM

View PostShar Wolf, on 20 February 2014 - 03:49 PM, said:

[/size]
No - you are being paranoid if you believe that the other team has nothing useful or positive to offer you.

Thank you for proving my points.


sorry my friend but your points are not proven at all.

in game chat when they are an opposing team thier really isnt anything that can be considered "needed to be said"

so what becomes is simply a tool for trolls.

now if your saying that out of game chat when were all not in a competative state i would agree that thier is alot of positives that can come from it.

#184 Sandpit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 17,419 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationArkansas

Posted 20 February 2014 - 04:58 PM

View PostHelbrecht, on 20 February 2014 - 04:54 PM, said:


so what becomes is simply a tool for trolls.


It only becomes that if you let them dictate the terms of how it's used. You're letting a few dbags dictate and define something for you.

#185 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 05:11 PM

View PostHelbrecht, on 20 February 2014 - 04:54 PM, said:

So what becomes is simply a tool for trolls.

Then like many things you stand up and work to change it.

I can guarantee you, that if you have dropped with or against me - you have seen it used for more than that.


Of course now - by your own logic, that is all the forums, television, phone networks, or any other form of communication we have is used for (after all, what is the bulk of Email used for but spam?) - so they aught to be shut down except where absolutely necessary.

"Someone used it to be a jerk! They should have no ability to use it!"
Is hardly the best argument to make your case.

#186 Kenyon Burguess

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 2,619 posts
  • LocationNE PA USA

Posted 23 February 2014 - 11:56 AM

<a%20href=

View PostMudhutwarrior, on 19 February 2014 - 05:36 AM, said:


[redacted]
Posted Image

#187 Joe Decker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Angel
  • The Angel
  • 685 posts
  • LocationTeutoburger Forest, Lower Saxony

Posted 23 February 2014 - 12:44 PM

I am surprised that "gg" is being discussed and not the other 28.550.331.943.626 Things People write and say in Chat with a clearly negative Intention. ^^

gg means good Game. I really ask myself how this could be seen as negative in any Way. I read the Examples, but there is no Way I could agree on them.

Maybe sometimes People read too much in a short Post. From my Experience that can be totally misleading.

Needs more positive Thinking ;)

Edited by Joe Decker, 23 February 2014 - 12:46 PM.


#188 Chagatay

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 964 posts

Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:06 PM

Should just have a box to disable enemy comms that would solve this problem. People are just ******** in general and show little to no sportsmanship but that is expected on the Internet.

#189 xTrident

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 655 posts
  • LocationWork or Home

Posted 24 February 2014 - 05:58 AM

View PostChagatay, on 23 February 2014 - 03:06 PM, said:

Should just have a box to disable enemy comms that would solve this problem. People are just ******** in general and show little to no sportsmanship but that is expected on the Internet.


Now that's not a bad idea. And I couldn't agree more with the bolded text.

#190 Enzane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 428 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationTemplar Command Training Camp.

Posted 24 February 2014 - 07:16 AM

Even if you win 12 - 0, It doesn't mean it wasn't a good game.

With no re-spawns, typically the first team to lose someone will lose. It's just a matter of numbers.

When its 12 v 11, you can have two mechs gang up on one. And it just folds from there. A game can still be good at 12 - 0.

GG, means Good Game. It's the most polite thing you CAN say! Would you rather it was NT? Nice Try? What would be the right thing to say?

#191 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:41 PM

View PostJoe Decker, on 23 February 2014 - 12:44 PM, said:

Needs more positive Thinking :unsure:

I like that. :ph34r:

#192 Sandpit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 17,419 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationArkansas

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:42 PM

View PostShar Wolf, on 24 February 2014 - 01:41 PM, said:

I like that. :unsure:

gp

#193 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:46 PM

View PostSandpit, on 24 February 2014 - 01:42 PM, said:

gp

Good Play?

Edit:
or Good Post?

Edited by Shar Wolf, 24 February 2014 - 01:46 PM.


#194 Sandpit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 17,419 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationArkansas

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:46 PM

good post :unsure:

#195 Blue Footed Booby

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationHere?

Posted 26 February 2014 - 08:19 AM

gg cloves

#196 wanderer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 11,152 posts
  • LocationStomping around in a giant robot, of course.

Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:26 AM

Quote

He's referring to the entire premise that "GG" has some ulterior and nefarious motive other than just being a good sport and saying "GG". If you fall into that category then yes, he's calling you a bit paranoid. If you don't, then he's not


Sandpit, I've sat there on a match where a fellow on my PUG team, after a 12-0 stomp said "GG" in open chat to the fellas we stomped, followed by:

"What a pack of ****ing losers."

He apparently meant that last one to be in team chat or lance. You ain't paranoid if they're really out to get you.

#197 wanderer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 11,152 posts
  • LocationStomping around in a giant robot, of course.

Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:33 AM

Quote

GG, means Good Game. It's the most polite thing you CAN say! Would you rather it was NT? Nice Try? What would be the right thing to say?


"Sorry for the stomp, clearly you shouldn't have been here."

"I see the matchmaker forgot to use lube again. My condolences."

"Don't stress too much, ELO is a lie and matches are essentially random."

"Spend some time in the training grounds before getting into another match."

#198 Alaskan Nobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 10,358 posts
  • LocationAlaska!

Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:13 PM

View Postwanderer, on 26 February 2014 - 09:26 AM, said:

He apparently meant that last one to be in team chat or lance. You ain't paranoid if they're really out to get you.

At that point you write them off as a particular individual to ignore (and pray that we eventually get a real ignore function)

Keep in mind that we are aware that there are exceptions to our rules.
Mostly we just want those who believe that "GG" itself is offensive to keep the same thing in mind

Edit: It is more the people who want to remove the other teams ability to chat or the like that we are calling paranoid (or those who want to filter the term "GG" - as if that would totally remove the other peoples abilities to mock them)

Edited by Shar Wolf, 26 February 2014 - 12:15 PM.


#199 xTrident

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 655 posts
  • LocationWork or Home

Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:55 PM

View PostShar Wolf, on 26 February 2014 - 12:13 PM, said:

At that point you write them off as a particular individual to ignore (and pray that we eventually get a real ignore function)

Keep in mind that we are aware that there are exceptions to our rules.
Mostly we just want those who believe that "GG" itself is offensive to keep the same thing in mind

Edit: It is more the people who want to remove the other teams ability to chat or the like that we are calling paranoid (or those who want to filter the term "GG" - as if that would totally remove the other peoples abilities to mock them)


Those of us that have debated the meaning of GG have all said it depends on the context, circumstance, or situation in which it was used. This whole idea of paranoia is ridiculous. We all know what GG stands for, that isn't the problem. None of you know exactly what may have been said before the match, how the match went and what was said before or after a "GG" was expressed.

My very first comment on this thread was that, as someone that was on a team that had just gotten their asses kicked I'd rather nothing be said by the winning team. But that goes both ways, I'd rather not say "GG" to a team we've just beaten down and risk it coming off the wrong way. Because yes, a beat down match and then posting just "GG" in TEXT mind you has a good possibility of coming off offensively. But not only that, I ask just why in the hell would one say good game when it really wasn't for the losing team...? Yeah, I can't imagine how one could take it wrong.

Now me, I don't chat much anyway, and if our team does get our asses kicked and it's pretty obvious it wasn't a good game for 80% of the players on the team, including me and someone on the other team posts "GG"... It's fine. And whether it's meant sincerely or as a bit of arrogance it doesn't bother me and unless I'm in a pissy mood I might comment back that it really wasn't, and that's it. 99% of the time I don't post anything because I don't want to be a **** either way. But come on, we were stomped, and getting my ass kicked isn't fun.

I'm just wondering IF all of you defending the use of "GG" after every game no matter what can understand where I/others are coming from? Like I said, I really don't care if you want to say it all the time and how you mean it. The thread is here and open for opinion.

Edited by xTrident, 26 February 2014 - 01:01 PM.


#200 Sandpit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 17,419 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationArkansas

Posted 26 February 2014 - 01:01 PM

View PostShar Wolf, on 26 February 2014 - 12:13 PM, said:

At that point you write them off as a particular individual to ignore (and pray that we eventually get a real ignore function)


^This

This entire conversation is NO different than buying into any other stereotype. I'm sure there's a few less than "nice" players out there that DO use it in a derogatory manner. That doesn't mean you, myself, or anyone else should give in and give up using it as it is really intended in the form of being a good sport. When you do that you're doing nothing more than letting those types of people dictate to you the meaning and use of something like that and I, for one, absolutely and positively refuse to let people like that dictate ANY portion of my life.





9 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users