Cataphract Ctf-3D (C) Becomes A Champion
#41
Posted 11 March 2014 - 05:28 PM
#42
Posted 11 March 2014 - 05:42 PM
The new Champion was maybe created after a party with tooo much drinks and other stuff...
Btw for what do u need this crap xp-boost, after master its worthless anyway.... got 2 Banshees on Elite in 4hrs without any xp-bonus...
edit:
all 3 new Banshees are out for MC as well,
3420mc for the BNC-3E (comes with STD380 engine)
3540mc for the BNC-3M (STD380)
3630mc for the BNC-3S (STD285)
all more than 1000mc cheaper, more armor, bigger engine
Edited by Battlestar3k, 11 March 2014 - 05:53 PM.
#43
Posted 11 March 2014 - 06:18 PM
Battlestar3k, on 11 March 2014 - 05:42 PM, said:
BlackDeathLegion, on 11 March 2014 - 10:30 AM, said:
I wont be buying this mech for MC. So nothing effects me at all!
. . .
I feel at least these would HELP out the newer players better than how this mech is currently built.
See, that's sort of the problem. We aren't 'complaining' or 'crying'. Essentially everyone has your exact level of disinterest in the 'Mech. We aren't telling PGI this is a bad champion out of greed or malice, but because it's like watching a girl scout with a runny nose who doesn't understand why her cookies aren't selling. We want them to succeed, but it's a really bloody hard thing to do when they refuse the tissue.
New players aren't going to play this trial 'Mech and go "wow, this thing rocks, I'm totally buying this." and then spend money on one. The fact that the base 'Mech is really quite good simply does not shine through the poor design. Players who know the variant rocks probably already have one, and/or would only purchase it if it came with components they could use at a price worth dropping MC for. The XP gain is not that much of an incentive.
POWR, on 11 March 2014 - 01:32 PM, said:
And we would have all gleefully ignored these theoretical people, as they clearly haven't the shallowest dregs of a clue as to what a champion 'Mech is, or how the game works.
Edited by no one, 11 March 2014 - 07:08 PM.
#44
Posted 11 March 2014 - 07:30 PM
#48
Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:27 PM
Or even a decent number of jumpjets.
mwhighlander, on 11 March 2014 - 07:46 PM, said:
He's very in tune with this game.
Oh the sarcasm. Truth be told though they'd get accused of promoting the meta if it was given a poptart rig.
#49
Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:29 PM
#50
Posted 11 March 2014 - 10:42 PM
Also, lb10x is very underrated. 1 pt less heat then ac/10, I believe it cycles a bit faster then an ac/10, and it kills things quick when they have open internals. My banshee is a monster with only 2 ppcs, 2 ml and an lb10x
#51
Posted 11 March 2014 - 10:58 PM
#52
Posted 12 March 2014 - 12:38 AM
Koniving, on 11 March 2014 - 08:27 PM, said:
Koniving, on 11 March 2014 - 08:27 PM, said:
I hope you don't refer to an additional lb10x?
Koniving, on 11 March 2014 - 08:27 PM, said:
Oh 1JJ is fine considering they haven't fixed the infinite JJ Bug that gets you on top of any hill but than again, how would that help a new player?
Edited by Eglar, 12 March 2014 - 12:40 AM.
#53
Posted 12 March 2014 - 12:47 AM
#54
Posted 12 March 2014 - 12:56 AM
o0Marduk0o, on 12 March 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:
I would list you a hoakload of reasons why LB10X still is BAD despite the added Crit chance which only happens on cored parts. Or you could just take a LB10X mech and go onto training ground and see how bad it is.
Considering that in this CTF3d Build in particular the LB10X + Ammo takes up more tonnage than the rest of the weapons all together I can't say it's a good weapon/build. ANY i mean really ANY other autocannon would have made a decent build.
#55
Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:11 AM
But like in lore, it's not made to punch through armor like normal AC, it's against aircraft (which we don't have), infantry and internals of mechs. But who cares about internals when you can destroy the location itself.
Edited by o0Marduk0o, 12 March 2014 - 01:18 AM.
#56
Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:11 AM
#57
Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:18 AM
o0Marduk0o, on 12 March 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:
True, that video is fairly outdated. Here's a much more recent one, courtesy of Wintersdark:
Also, we're already having this discussion in another thread. If you want to continue the great LB 10-X debate in the appropriate forum, that would be the place to do it. As a favor to me though, please do one thing first; go to you stats page, run the numbers on your damage per hits, and damage per shot for the AC/10 compared to the LB 10-X. If you're feeling ambitious you can find the ratio between those two numbers. Got your numbers? Good, here's the thread -
http://mwomercs.com/...-d/page__st__60
Edited by no one, 12 March 2014 - 01:44 AM.
#58
Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:36 AM
no one, on 12 March 2014 - 01:18 AM, said:
True, that video is fairly outdated. Here's a much more recent one, courtesy of Wintersdark:
Also, we've already had this discussion, but if you want to, we can continue the LB 10-X discussion in the relevant thread. As a favor to me though, please do one thing first; go to you stats page, run the numbers on your damage per hits, and damage per shot for the AC/10 compared to the LB 10-X. If you're feeling ambitious you can find the ratio between those two numbers. Got your numbers? Good, here's the thread -
http://mwomercs.com/...-d/page__st__60
It shows exactly what I say. The question you have to ask is what does a weapon not made against mechs in a mechfight. A weapon which is good against internals but not armor while you can ignore internals and just destroy the location.
#60
Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:48 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users