skorpionet, on 13 March 2014 - 07:25 AM, said:
But instead of creating games in which a team must win and one must lose, the MM could not create games in which this is an unknown factor?!?!
At this point erase the MM is the best choice, simply ... The Caos could do a better job
I get what you're saying, but the way they designed their Elo system....it just wouldn't work.
When the Matchmaker puts together a match, it puts together one team it predicts to win and one it predicts to lose.
If you're on the one predicted to win and do, in fact, win...your Elo doesn't change. If you lose, then it will drop by up to 50 points.
If you're on the team predicted to lose and do, in fact, lose...your Elo doesn't change. If you win, then it will increase by up to 50 points.
That's how they designed the thing. Without the prediction, Elo becomes meaningless.
Are there better ways of doing this? Probably, PGI hasn't overwhelmed me with their thoughtful insight or concern over playability. Even if you knew of a better way to do it, is there any chance at all that it would be implemented? Sure, if you bought out enough PGI stock to have a controlling interest in the company and told them what you expected. Other than that...I'd say it's a resounding "NO."
Unless, of course, you tell them on Twitter....because, let's face it, they don't pay any attention to the forums.