BlackhawkSC, on 24 March 2014 - 07:42 PM, said:
No it doesn't (and I did not fail match up the the nth grade). The score is built up from only the best 10 matches of 50 players for all teams, so if you divide all 500 scores by 50 (matches actually played) then you still have the same ranking. By the "other" logic, if only one Liao player played the tournament and only played 1 match and obtained 30 points (accidentally fired a MG at an opponent, ran back to base and the team won) then he would have the best average of all teams. I think you'll agree that this does not make much sense.
You do not know the scores of all matches minus the 50 so you cannot draw any conclusion, perhaps only that some teams needed less matches to arrive at their scores (but didn't win anyway). In the Davion/Steiner comparison you can say, however, that Davion didn't try hard enough as they played 16 matches less per player than Steiner?
I deliberately choose Lone Wolves, expecting less competition. Hey, it's my first ever only tournament in any game... I would have ended up ~25-30th in Liao and >50 in Steiner. That Steiner played much better is underscored by this little fact alone. So, my match place didn't start in the mechlab but at faction selection.... I just should have chosen Liao (I like the green logo) but really couldn't care less about factions
So perhaps our dear tournament overlords can release a total ranking so that you can see that the winning teams are really crowding the top of the list and the loosing teams aren't... (this is a verbal translation of: winning teams have higher average...)
Edited by The Great Unwashed, 24 March 2014 - 11:28 PM.