Am I wrong? Weren't we supposed to see a smurfy update where we would have a single display of the mech tree to update our mechs? I haven't played in awhile (I'm on vacation) so maybe I missed something but wasn't that planned to be included in the beginning of March?
Not cool yo.
1
Mech Building Update
Started by DaisuSaikoro Nagasawa, Mar 18 2014 05:27 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 March 2014 - 05:27 PM
#2
Posted 18 March 2014 - 07:00 PM
We did get a small bit of smurfy today.But dont ever count for a fully finished product from Pgi.
Many of the founders have seen this time and time again.I want to have faith in pgi but I am losing in confidence in what they can do especially a finished product in a patch."This smurfy isnt perfect but its a step forward"
Many of the founders have seen this time and time again.I want to have faith in pgi but I am losing in confidence in what they can do especially a finished product in a patch."This smurfy isnt perfect but its a step forward"
Edited by Shadelen, 18 March 2014 - 07:01 PM.
#3
Posted 19 March 2014 - 02:10 AM
What was the change? And I apologize to PGI, I shouldn't use the term Smurfy as it's going to be their thing... just somewhat "smurfy like" since that's the model people have been using... though I agree with some others where there may be better alternatives to mech building.
I believe PGI can get things done though this is a bit frustrating. I am surprised at how few people have mentioned it on the forums though.
I believe PGI can get things done though this is a bit frustrating. I am surprised at how few people have mentioned it on the forums though.
#4
Posted 19 March 2014 - 02:23 AM
This is what we got... someday it might even be interactive .
#5
Posted 19 March 2014 - 04:41 AM
From Patch notes:
" - Added "Mech Detail" screen in Mech Lab. (Phase 1 - Static)"
So we HOPE we will get the rest of it.
" - Added "Mech Detail" screen in Mech Lab. (Phase 1 - Static)"
So we HOPE we will get the rest of it.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users