They're just not effective! They need to be centered predominantly to the CT, they need to travel as fast as the AC5, and need to output at least 5dmg per missle.
In fact, they should not even require a lock, they should just seek out the closest mech. Also, change the arc angle so they hit directly on top, because cover is way OP at the moment.
I think LRM should be able to go through buildings too, because at the moment they are no where near as powerful as a PPC with its massive whopping 10dmg. 10dmg!?!? I can't believe PGI did this!
1
Lrm's Need A Bigger Buff
Started by Rex Budman, Mar 22 2014 10:26 PM
11 replies to this topic
#3
-
-
- Survivor
- 841 posts
Member
Posted 22 March 2014 - 10:33 PM
No Guts No Glory, on 22 March 2014 - 10:32 PM, said:
Man, I love the sarcasm in this.
Sarcasm?
#4
-
-
- Bad Company
- 235 posts
Member
Posted 22 March 2014 - 10:44 PM
Oh, I meant butthurt hidden behind sarcasm. Clear as day.
#5
-
-
- FP Veteran - Beta 1
- 7,918 posts
Member
- LocationWazan
Posted 22 March 2014 - 10:46 PM
You're able to find cover ? Every building I hide behind does nothing. My Dual AMS with Range booster wasted 2 tons of ammo and did nothing. Im back to running lights with ecm only.
Edited by Monkey Lover, 22 March 2014 - 10:47 PM.
#6
-
-
- Bad Company
- 235 posts
Member
Posted 22 March 2014 - 10:53 PM
If every building you hide behind does nothing, odds are, at least one LRM boat has flanked you.
#7
-
-
- Survivor
- 841 posts
Member
Posted 22 March 2014 - 11:00 PM
No Guts No Glory, on 22 March 2014 - 10:53 PM, said:
If every building you hide behind does nothing, odds are, at least one LRM boat has flanked you.
Oh definitely. River city buildings do provide cover. That is all.
#8
-
-
- FP Veteran - Beta 1
- 7,918 posts
Member
- LocationWazan
Posted 22 March 2014 - 11:15 PM
Rex Budman, on 22 March 2014 - 11:00 PM, said:
Oh definitely. River city buildings do provide cover. That is all.
you are right if the building is 3 times as tall as you are and you stand in the middle it does work
#9
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 93 posts
Member
- LocationToronto, Canada
Posted 22 March 2014 - 11:19 PM
BALANCE IT. Take off the charge from the gauss = lrm killer
#10
-
-
- 96 posts
Member
- LocationNZ - Lagshield Heaven
Posted 23 March 2014 - 12:31 AM
Rex Budman, on 22 March 2014 - 10:26 PM, said:
They're just not effective! They need to be centered predominantly to the CT, they need to travel as fast as the AC5, and need to output at least 5dmg per missle.
In fact, they should not even require a lock, they should just seek out the closest mech. Also, change the arc angle so they hit directly on top, because cover is way OP at the moment.
I think LRM should be able to go through buildings too, because at the moment they are no where near as powerful as a PPC with its massive whopping 10dmg. 10dmg!?!? I can't believe PGI did this!
In fact, they should not even require a lock, they should just seek out the closest mech. Also, change the arc angle so they hit directly on top, because cover is way OP at the moment.
I think LRM should be able to go through buildings too, because at the moment they are no where near as powerful as a PPC with its massive whopping 10dmg. 10dmg!?!? I can't believe PGI did this!
I totally agree. This should definitely happen. Also, make LRM20s take up 2 crit slots, and weigh 4 tons. Its unfair that they take soooo many more slots than my Medium Lasers.
Are we playing sarcastaball?
#11
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 48 posts
Member
- LocationGermany
Posted 23 March 2014 - 01:36 AM
If PGI would implement destroyable maps, the issue with the cover is fixed.
but that means a lot of work for those programers...
but that means a lot of work for those programers...
#12
-
-
- 160 posts
Member
- LocationNot where I want to be
Posted 23 March 2014 - 06:57 AM
Rex Budman, on 22 March 2014 - 10:26 PM, said:
In fact, they should not even require a lock, they should just seek out the closest mech. Also, change the arc angle so they hit directly on top, because cover is way OP at the moment.
You joke about this, but DICE actually did it in BF4 with "Active Missiles"
Be very careful what you wish for.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users
