Timberwolf Scale
#1
Posted 10 April 2014 - 06:54 PM
#2
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:00 PM
It looks like the Timber Wolf is actually a little further from the tower than the Dragon is, so the perspective might be off by a notch.
#3
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:08 PM
Bhael Fire, on 10 April 2014 - 07:00 PM, said:
It looks like the Timber Wolf is actually a little further from the tower than the Dragon is, so the perspective might be off by a notch.
yeah just a bit its a rough estimate. Timberwolf's left leg is just at the red/grey boarder on the ground, whereas the dragon's foot crosses it. but its very close. Any discrepancies would be from differences in perspective
but if we were to take the timberwolf's being a bit further up towards the camera than the dragon, we can say it is a slight bit under 7
Edited by Jin Ma, 10 April 2014 - 07:11 PM.
#4
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:08 PM
Bhael Fire, on 10 April 2014 - 07:00 PM, said:
It looks like the Timber Wolf is actually a little further from the tower than the Dragon is, so the perspective might be off by a notch.
From the look of it the Timberwolf has the legs in a moving motion meaning they are pitched up adding height.
TBH the Timber Wolf looks are tall as a Catapult but with more width.
#5
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:12 PM
Jin Ma, on 10 April 2014 - 07:08 PM, said:
yeah just a bit its a rough estimate. Timberwolf's left leg is just at the red/grey boarder on the ground, whereas the dragon's foot crosses it. but its very close. Any discrepancies would be from differences in perspective
but if we were to take the timberwolf's being a bit further up towards the camera than the dragon, we can say it is a slight bit under 7
One angle is looking down, the other angle is looking up.
I suspect the Timberwolf is closer to the 6.
#6
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:13 PM
#7
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:19 PM
Craig Steele, on 10 April 2014 - 07:12 PM, said:
One angle is looking down, the other angle is looking up.
I suspect the Timberwolf is closer to the 6.
very easy to test this. just take a dragon and move the angle downwards near where the timberwolf's shot is taken.
i suspect it won't make much of a difference given how close they are to the pillar. it may put the dragon up to solid 6.2 from 5.9ish and if you then move the dragon closer to the camera like the timberwolf it would go from 6.2 to maybe 6.5. Though to be that precise we'd have to say the timberwolf from the SS angle would be at 7.2
Either way the timberwolf is going to be a bit bigger than the dragon which is fine considering its 15 tons heavier.
Edited by Jin Ma, 10 April 2014 - 07:20 PM.
#8
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:23 PM
Perfectly reasonable looking ratio of torso and leg.
Perspective is a tad forced. Upwards angle. Torso Tilted down. Legs are moving giving more height.
#9
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:32 PM
Tichorius Davion, on 10 April 2014 - 07:23 PM, said:
Perfectly reasonable looking ratio of torso and leg.
Perspective is a tad forced. Upwards angle. Torso Tilted down. Legs are moving giving more height.
Yeah, the Timber Wolf looks awesome. People need to take their nerd sticks out of their butts.
#10
Posted 10 April 2014 - 07:34 PM
Metal Rod/Sticks for legs and Bendy Straw for Arms.
#11
Posted 10 April 2014 - 08:03 PM
#12
Posted 10 April 2014 - 08:39 PM
Now with a lousy shoop and the lowest possible perspective I can get. Still not as low as the screens from pgi. Locust is tallll.
edit; someone art better than me please.
Edited by Tichorius Davion, 10 April 2014 - 08:46 PM.
#15
Posted 11 April 2014 - 03:13 AM
I do like the old MW2 Timberwolf too. I did not care for the MW4 one :/
#16
Posted 11 April 2014 - 08:03 AM
* Ok, legs are a bit bulky, but I feel they are the right length.
* Not sure I like how the arms are done. Could have been dropped a tiny bit an the missile racks elevated off the arms similar to the older Timberwolfs.
* Torso could have been a bit pointier. Yea you don't want a larger CT, but it seems a bit too recessed visually.
Still, once all is said and done, I like it. I will definently be getting one when the C-Bill variant launches.
#18
Posted 11 April 2014 - 11:02 AM
#19
Posted 12 April 2014 - 11:10 AM
Malleus011, on 11 April 2014 - 11:02 AM, said:
yeah it is a bit chubby... oh well. I guess it got the MWO treatment of phat legs so at least they are consistent.
Edited by Jin Ma, 12 April 2014 - 11:10 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users