Jump to content

So Is This What We Should Expect From The "improved" Geometry Awesome?

BattleMechs Weapons General

59 replies to this topic

#21 No Guts No Glory

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 235 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 02:39 PM

Geometry pass on the awesome will be ppc nipples, or more badonkadonk.

#22 Lyoto Machida

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 5,082 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 03:25 PM

View PostSilentium, on 17 April 2014 - 12:24 PM, said:

Is it wrong that I saw that, and thought of this?

Posted Image


Posted Image

#23 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:36 PM

Posted Image

weapon geometry standardization at it's finest.

Hey look!!! They both got 2 PPCs!!!!!
(yeah and of course, PPCs are such a large weapon that Omnimechs CANNOT mount a hand actuator if they mount one. Food for thought.)

Edited by Bishop Steiner, 17 April 2014 - 04:37 PM.


#24 Captain Stiffy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 2,234 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:41 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 17 April 2014 - 04:36 PM, said:

Posted Image

weapon geometry standardization at it's finest.

Hey look!!! They both got 2 PPCs!!!!!
(yeah and of course, PPCs are such a large weapon that Omnimechs CANNOT mount a hand actuator if they mount one. Food for thought.)


LOL it's just a smaller version of the same model
llololololololoaflosololapsepopoolplopplopoloplopllololool

#25 Funky Bacon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 629 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 04:50 PM

I hope it will be something like this....
Posted Image
-
Posted Image
-
Posted Image
.... But I know better than to get my hopes up. :<

#26 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:35 PM

View PostFunky Bacon, on 17 April 2014 - 04:50 PM, said:

I hope it will be something like this....
Posted Image
-
Posted Image
-
Posted Image
.... But I know better than to get my hopes up. :<

really digging those large lasers on the LT on the bottom one.

#27 Lightfoot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 6,612 posts
  • LocationOlympus Mons

Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:51 PM

Does this mean the AWS will go on the slim-fast diet? So it's not Mr. Buffet Mech?

#28 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 06:53 PM

View PostLightfoot, on 17 April 2014 - 06:51 PM, said:

Does this mean the AWS will go on the slim-fast diet? So it's not Mr. Buffet Mech?



No. apparently just it's weapons will. Which will only make the fat underneath look even MORE ludicrous.

#29 TELEFORCE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ardent
  • The Ardent
  • 1,583 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 07:04 PM

I hope the Awesome keeps its big PPCs. In most BattleTech illustrations of that 'mech, it had big PPC barrels. I'd chalk it up to different PPC and 'mech manufacturers. After all, IRL different manufacturers accomplish the same thing with differing designs.

#30 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 07:07 PM

View PostTELEFORCE, on 17 April 2014 - 07:04 PM, said:

I hope the Awesome keeps its big PPCs. In most BattleTech illustrations of that 'mech, it had big PPC barrels. I'd chalk it up to different PPC and 'mech manufacturers. After all, IRL different manufacturers accomplish the same thing with differing designs.

then let me buy those IWW PPCs for my K, please! I'll bloody well pay MC to get them back if i had to!

#31 Crunk Prime

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 255 posts
  • LocationJamalia

Posted 17 April 2014 - 08:08 PM

PPCs. Such a huge and powerful energy weapon system that the Awesome was built around them, with each huge tube being housed in its own section of the mech.

But the firestarter can shove three tiny ones into its fist, that do the same damage as the big ones. Firestarter can also shove a micro AC/20 into its chest. A gun so large the Hunchback was built with a giant hunch on one shoulder to house it.

Posted Image

#32 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 08:11 PM

View PostCrunk Prime, on 17 April 2014 - 08:08 PM, said:

PPCs. Such a huge and powerful energy weapon system that the Awesome was built around them, with each huge tube being housed in its own section of the mech.

But the firestarter can shove three tiny ones into its fist, that do the same damage as the big ones. Firestarter can also shove a micro AC/20 into its chest. A gun so large the Hunchback was built with a giant hunch on one shoulder to house it.

Posted Image

What can I say. It IS the most interesting Mech in the Inner Sphere.



















(and yes, exactly the point I was getting at)

#33 Roland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,260 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 08:26 PM

View PostSilentium, on 17 April 2014 - 12:24 PM, said:

Is it wrong that I saw that, and thought of this?

Posted Image

THIS IS OFFENSIVE.

I feel that I must point you to an old thread started by the one and only ERRATIC CHEESE.

Posted Image

In all seriousness though, I can't be the only one who thinks that making custom visuals for individual weapons is pretty damn close to the bottom of the priority list in terms of things this game needs.

Seriously, I'm not the only one who thinks that, am I?

Cause when I think of improvements that need to be made to MWO to make me want to play again, custom weapon visuals on an awesome doesn't even get into my "Top 100" list.

#34 Jin Ma

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,323 posts

Posted 17 April 2014 - 08:29 PM

View PostRoland, on 17 April 2014 - 08:26 PM, said:

THIS IS OFFENSIVE.

I feel that I must point you to an old thread started by the one and only ERRATIC CHEESE.

Posted Image

In all seriousness though, I can't be the only one who thinks that making custom visuals for individual weapons is pretty damn close to the bottom of the priority list in terms of things this game needs.

Seriously, I'm not the only one who thinks that, am I?

Cause when I think of improvements that need to be made to MWO to make me want to play again, custom weapon visuals on an awesome doesn't even get into my "Top 100" list.


its fine they got different peeps working on different things.

But yeah if they can't do it right, might as well leave it alone

#35 Kenyon Burguess

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 2,619 posts
  • LocationNE PA USA

Posted 17 April 2014 - 08:33 PM

have to switch to large lasers for that squared peck look i guess.

#36 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 April 2014 - 09:18 PM

View PostRoland, on 17 April 2014 - 08:26 PM, said:

THIS IS OFFENSIVE.

I feel that I must point you to an old thread started by the one and only ERRATIC CHEESE.

Posted Image

In all seriousness though, I can't be the only one who thinks that making custom visuals for individual weapons is pretty damn close to the bottom of the priority list in terms of things this game needs.

Seriously, I'm not the only one who thinks that, am I?

Cause when I think of improvements that need to be made to MWO to make me want to play again, custom weapon visuals on an awesome doesn't even get into my "Top 100" list.

We already know what we are gonna get, balance and mechanics wise. PGI has yo-yo'd the nerf-buff bat a few times, but the song remains the same.

So, yeah, facing reality, I want to at least have good looking mechs as I play Stompy Robot TDM.

#37 Sug

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • The People
  • 4,629 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 17 April 2014 - 09:51 PM

View PostJin Ma, on 17 April 2014 - 08:29 PM, said:


its fine they got different peeps working on different things.



Indeed. The art people are working around the clock on new models and camos while the programmers are doing outside contract work.

#38 xengk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 2,502 posts
  • LocationKuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Posted 17 April 2014 - 09:59 PM

If those barrel count as hitbox for side torso, I wouldn't mind it so much.
At least I don't get CT cored from taking shots on the side.

Posted Image

#39 Wolfways

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • 6,499 posts
  • LocationIn a shutdown overheated mech near you.

Posted 17 April 2014 - 10:25 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 17 April 2014 - 04:36 PM, said:

Posted Image

weapon geometry standardization at it's finest.

Hey look!!! They both got 2 PPCs!!!!!
(yeah and of course, PPCs are such a large weapon that Omnimechs CANNOT mount a hand actuator if they mount one. Food for thought.)

But PPC's can't be that big. Even the Locust can mount them... :)

#40 Impyrium

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 2,104 posts
  • LocationSouth Australia

Posted 17 April 2014 - 10:35 PM

There's no solution unless you ditch free full customization, and that's not going to happen, is it? I don't think, realistically, that Firestarter is going to carry three PPCs on one arm with the size from the Awesome.





13 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 13 guests, 0 anonymous users