Jump to content

Instead Of 3/3/3/3 It Should Be...


10 replies to this topic

#1 ArmandTulsen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,184 posts

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:11 PM

2/5/3/2.

The lights and assaults should comprise the least amount of mechs per group with more emphasis on medium and heavy composition. This also falls in with the lore, and the fact that there are a hell of a lot of mediums in the game.

Thoughts?

#2 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:12 PM

Instead of 3/3/3/3, it should be...

Role Warfare.

#3 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:17 PM

role warfare would be nice.

#4 Bartholomew bartholomew

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 1,250 posts
  • LocationInner sphere drop point

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:18 PM

I think they should make a test bucket with 3/3/3/3, R&R, solo only. And any other little nerf screaming thing people come up with. And let the nerfy nerfy crowd go enjoy it.

Then leave the regular MM bucket like it has been up.

And then lets see how many people will 'ACTUALLY' play all that junk.

Cause really. I have no great problems with teams and odd weights. Makes for some of the best matches. Just becasue the other side ends up with all the assaults. Does not mean they are going to win..

Edited by Bartholomew bartholomew, 20 May 2014 - 04:19 PM.


#5 Hellcat420

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 1,520 posts

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:36 PM

View PostKhobai, on 20 May 2014 - 04:17 PM, said:

role warfare would be nice.

role warfare wont work with the mechlab. pgi killed the idea of role warfare when they decided you should be able to pick any mech and make it fit the role you want it to be. the best thing they can do is go back to the weight class matching system the game had back in beta.

#6 Murzao

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 388 posts

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:46 PM

Shouldn't be X/X/X/X at all, but tonnage weight limits and if you want to roll with 7 Atlai so be it vs a 15 medium team.

And then, when clans come out the 10v12 is already implemented.

#7 Chaotee

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 34 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:54 PM

View PostMurzao, on 20 May 2014 - 04:46 PM, said:

Shouldn't be X/X/X/X at all, but tonnage weight limits and if you want to roll with 7 Atlai so be it vs a 15 medium team.

And then, when clans come out the 10v12 is already implemented.


Seconded.

#8 ArmandTulsen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,184 posts

Posted 20 May 2014 - 04:56 PM

I just think that if they're going to limit classes anyway, they should have more mediums and heavies, with emphasis on the mediums.

This is coming from primarily an assault pilot.

I want the feeling of killing another Atlas and knowing there's only one assault asset left on the other team.

This way assaults can be terrifying again. Not this crap we have now where they're dogfood.

And lights too would be valuable, seeing as how if they go down, you lose intel.

Edited by ArmandTulsen, 20 May 2014 - 04:58 PM.


#9 Kassatsu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 1,078 posts
  • LocationColorado

Posted 20 May 2014 - 05:10 PM

Yes, let's make the queue require 5 mediums because that won't make the queue times even worse by forcing even MORE of the least played weight class into the queue or anything.

#10 Chaotee

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 34 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 20 May 2014 - 05:18 PM

View PostKassatsu, on 20 May 2014 - 05:10 PM, said:

Yes, let's make the queue require 5 mediums because that won't make the queue times even worse by forcing even MORE of the least played weight class into the queue or anything.


That's... actually sort of correct. It doesn't matter what numbers you put down, 2/5/5/2 or 8/1/2/1 as long as the matchmaker says 'you must have this many class X" to go on this ride, its going to significantly slow down queue times while it waits for the magic X number to fill up.

Overall weight limits or/with multiple mechs queued is the way to go.

Edited by Chaote, 20 May 2014 - 05:19 PM.


#11 Nyte Kitsune

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 440 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationSeattle, Wa USA

Posted 20 May 2014 - 05:19 PM

View PostBartholomew bartholomew, on 20 May 2014 - 04:18 PM, said:

I think they should make a test bucket with 3/3/3/3, R&R, solo only. And any other little nerf screaming thing people come up with. And let the nerfy nerfy crowd go enjoy it.

Then leave the regular MM bucket like it has been up.

And then lets see how many people will 'ACTUALLY' play all that junk.

Cause really. I have no great problems with teams and odd weights. Makes for some of the best matches. Just becasue the other side ends up with all the assaults. Does not mean they are going to win..

True, I had a match last week where, at first glance. It looked bad. (7 Lights, 1 Med, 3 Heavies, 1 assault, my team, 6 Assault, 3 heavies, 2 Meds and a Light on the enemy team), Funny thing is, my team won. So personally I think that this 3/3/3/3 mess should just be dropped, 2 tries and they've botched it both times. Sorry PGI guys, you know its true, time to just give up on this idea.

And fix the LRMs, SSRMs and LBXs (My LBXs have been having sporadic range issues since todays patch, sometimes they fire properly, the rest of the time they drop like badly fired lrms at 250m and end up falling and hitting the ground, sorry, I don't record so I can't show it)





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users