Mechs Are Not Robots People!
#41
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:03 AM
But as long as I only get to drop, fight, die rinse and repeat.....
GIANT STOMPY ROBOTS front and center!
#42
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:08 AM
#43
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:14 AM
Guaranteed to make at least one enemy player start nerd-raging in chat instead of moving around and shooting, giving me a chance to shoot him with narc and a few lasers at the back.
60% of the time it works every time.
#44
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:23 AM
#45
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:36 AM
#46
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:38 AM
#47
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:39 AM
Actuators and gyros are listed in the game, so as consequence there will be running low level real time closed-loop controls, working upon actuator feedback ( position, torque ) or some sort of impedance control to keep them standing up and aiming correctly - despite shake / damage - while you (the remote operator) will control the higher level functions.
This fits the description of real life partially autonomous teleoperated robots! except size and weapons, of course
#48
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:45 AM
Alistair Winter, on 10 July 2014 - 10:46 PM, said:
I'm not sure why people keep feeding his ego, just ignore the Island troll and he'll eventually go away from lack of attention.
#49
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:49 AM
Robot: a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, especially one programmable by a computer.
If Mechs were actually Robots, there'd be no need for Pilots.
Think about it.
Tycho von Gagern, on 10 July 2014 - 09:44 PM, said:
This was my stance for the longest time - but how will anybody learn if you dumb it down for them?
My girlfriend now knows what a Battlemech is, and I feel slightly cooler because of this.
Edited by Fut, 11 July 2014 - 05:49 AM.
#50
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:50 AM
#51
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:51 AM
stjobe, on 11 July 2014 - 02:39 AM, said:
Minor correction bolded and underlined above.
Mechs are "robotic" but not fully robots. By the way you want to define robot many cars these days are robots. They automatically adjust fuel flow, learn driver's driving habits and adjust to them, can perform many tasks on their own such as parallel parking, and have proximity sensors that provide their driver with information.
Battlemechs are first and foremost a vehicle. They are, in general, anthropomorphic vehicles. The Battle tech universe has mechs in multiple roles, not just combat. They are used for industrial purposes such as the Forestry Mechs, or for offloading cargo, and many other tasks.
All of them have complex computers and programming to allow them to run all of their subsystems but there is always a human intelligence in the loop hooked into the neural helmet. They are not even semi-autonomous.
Quote
ˌsemēôˈtänəməs,ˌsemˌī-/
adjective
adjective: semi-autonomous
1.
(of a country, state, or community) having a degree of, but not complete, self-government.
"Russia's semiautonomous republics"
2.
acting independently to some degree.
"semiautonomous working groups"
Without a pilot they can't even raise their arm, much less walk around avoiding objects. Now, the pilot doesn't have to concentrate on any of that because subsystems and programming handles all that, but without the pilot the Batlemech can not function and semi autonomous is self governing to a large degree.
#52
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:52 AM
Hercs are giant stompy robots controlled by either humans or AI.
Now that adds a whole additional level of confusion on the issue.
Thanks Sierra Online for that great Mechwarrior knockoff franchise (Earthseige).
#53
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:54 AM
#54
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:55 AM
#55
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:59 AM
#56
Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:59 AM
CaptainDeez, on 11 July 2014 - 05:55 AM, said:
I was always confused by those. Are they really robots or imprisoned Angels? (Alien creatures).
I always thought they were Angels imprisoned by metal armor shackles and piloted by children. Then again, that show was so confusing and pretentious, it was crazy
#57
Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:00 AM
Because if you read my post, if we intend at lower level, it's always a robot, since it automatically translate your movement in actuator movement considering forces, structure kinematics and mechanical constraints, all in a small time window, continuously, and basing on pilot feedback.
If you intend at higher level, then it is a IA problem, not exclusively inherent to robotics world. Tge robot surgeon DaVinci is a teleoperated robot with sensors actuators and control systems, but it needs anyway a human to execute laparoscopy.
Robots can be autonomous or non autonomous at cognitive level, but they still have in common the automation of lower level controls. It's simply the top layer that changes - pseudo IA intended as neural network based cognitive learning, human presence, or a mere bash script. :-)
#58
Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:02 AM
MeiSooHaityu, on 11 July 2014 - 05:59 AM, said:
I always thought they were Angels imprisoned by metal armor shackles and piloted by children. Then again, that show was so confusing and pretentious, it was crazy
True, either way I need someone to fix the CT hitbox on my Timberwolf. That megadues feels like one big center torso at times.
#59
Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:04 AM
#60
Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:17 AM
11 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users