Jump to content

Why Can't Is Mechs Have No Minimum Range Lrms?


46 replies to this topic

#41 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:19 PM

Posted Image

#42 Daneel Hazen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Commander
  • Nova Commander
  • 173 posts
  • LocationFlorida

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:20 PM

IS missiles are more prone to blow up and might be 100s of years old. Safety first.

Sounds good to me.

#43 Revis Volek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,247 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationBack in the Pilots chair

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:35 PM

Well if we are throwing out lore and just doing whatever we want they why play the game? Why be here, Why even post on the forums? Why breath?

Lore is what makes this game what it is...otherwise we are in unrecognizable mechs, no name weapon systems and we cannot use any of the fun stuff we have that are PART OF CANNON. There would be NO LRMS period....there would just be missile and they would have to start from the ground and work up to create something completely new. Just two seconds of thought before the text vomit next time you prolly could have answered you own question, think before you type.

Edited by DarthRevis, 16 July 2014 - 01:35 PM.


#44 R Razor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 1,583 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania ...'Merica!!

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:41 PM

View PostBhael Fire, on 15 July 2014 - 08:43 AM, said:


No, this is a BattleTech game.



Not really, but IS still shouldn't have no min range LRM's.

View Postice trey, on 16 July 2014 - 01:09 PM, said:

If they planned to ignore the lore, they wouldn't have used the "MechWarrior" title.



While agree with most of your post, I think this part gives way more credit than is due........they used MechWarrior because they knew it would draw money spenders to the game........they ignore lore on a consistent basis, going all the way back to the initial decision to allow the IS to field what are basically better Omni Mechs than the Clans have insofar as customization and lack of restrictions on weapons load outs go.

#45 Bhael Fire

    Banned - Cheating

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,002 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationThe Outback wastes of planet Outreach.

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:52 PM

View PostR Razor, on 16 July 2014 - 01:41 PM, said:

Not really, but IS still shouldn't have no min range LRM's.


But...

Posted Image

#46 R Razor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 1,583 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania ...'Merica!!

Posted 16 July 2014 - 01:59 PM

View PostBhael Fire, on 16 July 2014 - 01:52 PM, said:


But...

Posted Image



Yup, and a lot of us suckers believed it and spent money on it too........it's not the first time a company has "stretched" the truth when it comes to describing a product and it surely won't be the last.

So your point?

#47 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 16 July 2014 - 02:04 PM

I think this thread probably should have just ended with the second post. (Perhaps with the slight addition of "Ripple-fire LRMs")





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users