Awesome Awesome?
#1
Posted 09 November 2012 - 03:52 PM
But is it really that awesome?
Any tips tricks or anything else anybody might be willing to share with me? I'm mostly looking for something thats cost efficient, so while the thought of an LRM boat sounds nice, I dont think it'll be affordable in the long run (unless I abuse the 75% free ammo).
#2
Posted 09 November 2012 - 06:56 PM
Edit: stupid mobile phone auto correct.
Edited by Vactus, 09 November 2012 - 06:57 PM.
#3
Posted 09 November 2012 - 07:11 PM
I like the Awesome line of Mechs. The 8Q can stuff 4PPCs in the chest and a couple med lasers on the arm, the 8T can haul 4 LRM launchers and backup lasers, the 8R is a balanced missile/energy platform, and the 9M can be spec'd as a very fast Assault brawler.
Their weakness is an exposed head, which places them best slightly behind the front brawl... so that 9M is a risky brawler if you so spec it.
Edited by Prosperity Park, 09 November 2012 - 07:21 PM.
#4
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:42 AM
#6
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:52 AM
Thanks guys!
Especially for that Mechspecs site!
#7
Posted 10 November 2012 - 01:27 PM
1 sml lzr, 2 med lzr, 2 srm6, 2srm4, Endo, Ferro, DoubleHS, 275 engine.
Armour maxed and runs about 60kph.
Absolute Brawler and deadly in dual...
(Punch in the FACE!)
#8
Posted 30 June 2014 - 04:14 AM
#9
Posted 02 July 2014 - 02:45 PM
#10
Posted 02 July 2014 - 03:11 PM
Trevor Belmont, on 30 June 2014 - 04:14 AM, said:
Pkunk, on 02 July 2014 - 02:45 PM, said:
You guys are digging too deep for topics. The OP talks about the cost of ammo....
Edited by Sug, 02 July 2014 - 03:11 PM.
#11
Posted 02 July 2014 - 03:32 PM
#12
Posted 02 July 2014 - 03:38 PM
Cleverbird, on 09 November 2012 - 03:52 PM, said:
But is it really that awesome?
Any tips tricks or anything else anybody might be willing to share with me? I'm mostly looking for something thats cost efficient, so while the thought of an LRM boat sounds nice, I dont think it'll be affordable in the long run (unless I abuse the 75% free ammo).
Given I have run every Awesome right now except the 9M, no, it is not cost efficient, no Assault is.
Cost efficient is low cost including modifications. I would experiment on Smurfy's site to see what Mechs with modifications you want would cost.
Here are some chassis that are cost efficient, this is based on how much each non-Champion/Hero costs in CB. They may not be considered the best by some players but some Mechs have 1 variant costing near double one of the others due to tech installed.
Light - Firestater, Jenner
Medium - Blackjack, Hunchback, Kintaro
Heavy - Quickdraw, Catapult, Thunderbolt
Assault - Victor, I would even say Highlander, Banshee
#13
Posted 02 July 2014 - 04:33 PM
Merchant, on 02 July 2014 - 03:38 PM, said:
Cost efficient is low cost including modifications. I would experiment on Smurfy's site to see what Mechs with modifications you want would cost.
Here are some chassis that are cost efficient, this is based on how much each non-Champion/Hero costs in CB. They may not be considered the best by some players but some Mechs have 1 variant costing near double one of the others due to tech installed.
Light - Firestater, Jenner
Medium - Blackjack, Hunchback, Kintaro
Heavy - Quickdraw, Catapult, Thunderbolt
Assault - Victor, I would even say Highlander, Banshee
November 9th. 2012.
That's how old the post you're responding to is.
#14
Posted 02 July 2014 - 05:35 PM
IraqiWalker, on 02 July 2014 - 03:32 PM, said:
To be fair - when I search for a topic (say AWS9M) it tends to give me the older ones first.
I usually have to dig through several pages before I get out of the closed beta threads.
(been trying to figure out how to tell support about that, my awkward phrasings so far seem to have done more to irritate them than to help )
#15
Posted 02 July 2014 - 06:49 PM
Shar Wolf, on 02 July 2014 - 05:35 PM, said:
I usually have to dig through several pages before I get out of the closed beta threads.
(been trying to figure out how to tell support about that, my awkward phrasings so far seem to have done more to irritate them than to help )
True, but people can easily look at the OP's post date and see that it was in 2012. Let alone seeing the 75% ammo comment.
Edited by IraqiWalker, 02 July 2014 - 06:49 PM.
#16
Posted 02 July 2014 - 07:13 PM
IraqiWalker, on 02 July 2014 - 06:49 PM, said:
True - and yet... I for one frequently forget to do that, so I at least, will not be holding that overly against them.
(Which is not to say I will not hold that against them at all- because despite my weakness there, that is on the "list" of things one should check )
#17
Posted 05 July 2014 - 04:20 PM
It looks great on paper. It even looks Awesome.
But it absolutely sucks.
The Awesome is probably the single worst mech in the entire game, and I'm saying this as a pilot that loves Awesomes and has played a thousand or so rounds in them.
There are a few gimmick builds that will be excepted from the general terriblehorriblegodawfulunderperformingstinkingpieceof....
#18
Posted 17 July 2014 - 04:59 AM
i have all of them and lately got the Pretty Baby as well, could use some tweaks but damn, what a nice mech. I for myself am successful in minimalistic builds with high speed, thats why i go with this:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...f499fd92cd93212
#19
Posted 17 July 2014 - 06:51 PM
MadMaxMKII, on 17 July 2014 - 04:59 AM, said:
i have all of them and lately got the Pretty Baby as well, could use some tweaks but damn, what a nice mech. I for myself am successful in minimalistic builds with high speed, thats why i go with this:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...f499fd92cd93212
That is a fine job, sir!
#20
Posted 18 July 2014 - 07:07 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users