Edited by Cathy, 05 August 2014 - 11:13 AM.
Hero Mech Hellslinger
#61
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:13 AM
#62
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:17 AM
#63
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:22 AM
Yea, you are right. In table top, it was. Same with a lot of other mechs. In MWO, however, ballistics are... I don't want to say mandatory; because they are not. They are a huge draw. A big upside. More so than they have ever been in any incarnation of MW or BT that I know of. Ghost heat makes it even more so. Now, with the introduction of the Clans, they are even more valued as they are the thing the IS have over clan mechs.
Don't think I'm right? Okay. Then ask yourselves, if the Devs put out this guy for MC as a hero mech:
http://www.sarna.net...28BattleMech%29
How many do you see getting snatched up on the first day? 4x Ballistics, one in each arm, one in each torso, on a 95 ton mech.
#64
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:23 AM
LakeDaemon, on 05 August 2014 - 11:04 AM, said:
<Battlemaster hears your cries and begins to dance and sing>
They say I don't belong
I must stay below alone.
Because of my beliefs I'm supposed to stay where evil is sown
But what is evil anyway?
Is there reason to the rhyme?
Without evil there can be no good,
So it must be good to be evil sometimes.
Up there,
there is so much room,
where babies burp and flowers bloom.
Everyone dreams, I can dream too.
Up there, up where the skies are ocean blue.
I can be safe and live without a care
live without a care
If only I could live up there.
I wanna live
I wanna live up there
Ooh baby, ooh
I want to live up there.
#65
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:26 AM
Saxie, on 05 August 2014 - 10:47 AM, said:
Its the other way around. Tourmaline would be cooler, Frozen City would be hotter. The external environment temperature has less of an effect on this mech
I realize that. I was expressing a desire to see the opposite effect - one in which the environment has a greater effect on the Mech.
Reread my post.
#66
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:26 AM
#67
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:34 AM
#68
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:39 AM
#69
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:39 AM
#70
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:40 AM
#71
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:43 AM
Kommisar, on 05 August 2014 - 11:22 AM, said:
Yea, you are right. In table top, it was. Same with a lot of other mechs. In MWO, however, ballistics are... I don't want to say mandatory; because they are not. They are a huge draw. A big upside. More so than they have ever been in any incarnation of MW or BT that I know of. Ghost heat makes it even more so. Now, with the introduction of the Clans, they are even more valued as they are the thing the IS have over clan mechs.
Don't think I'm right? Okay. Then ask yourselves, if the Devs put out this guy for MC as a hero mech:
http://www.sarna.net...28BattleMech%29
How many do you see getting snatched up on the first day? 4x Ballistics, one in each arm, one in each torso, on a 95 ton mech.
You've missed my point at least, probably that of anyone else you're arguing against as well.
My point is that it's silly to piss and moan about a Battlemaster hero being introduced without ballistic mounts. There are already plenty and enough hero 'mechs with ballistic mounts- there's no need to take a 'mech that was never supposed to be about ballistics in the first place and give it said mounts.
Whether or not ballistics are desirable or a draw, it isn't sensible to base a hero variant of a Battlemaster on them, and it isn't necessary to include them on such a 'mech. Yet it's being complained about as though the 'mech is useless without ballistics, or it's crazy not to have put it on there.
Bizarre Jay, on 05 August 2014 - 11:39 AM, said:
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Battlemaster
Find it on this page. The design has ferro-fibrous. Remember, PGI is attempting to be true to the canon material where applicable for 'mech design.
#72
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:43 AM
Fitting the environmental sealing was impossible, sadly. Even if I converted it to a Omnimech. So it was impossible to test to see if it had similar results. (This is on something I was saying several pages back on this thread about seeing if environmental sealing would do something similar on tabletop).
Anyway, I'm actually glad that we got our Hellslinger. It's an actual canon mech of notoriety.
"BLR-1GHE BattleMaster HellSlinger
This Star League Era variant removes the Machine Guns and SRM launcher and their ammunition. The SRM launcher is replaced by three Streak SRM-2 launchers with a single ton of ammunition. Two forward Medium Lasers are removed, and an extra PPC is mounted in the left arm. Sixteen Double Heat Sinks keep the 'Mech cool, and the 'Mech's armor is upgraded to Ferro-Fibrous armor. An extra half ton of armor is also installed."
Rare, but common enough to be acceptable in some numbers on the same field.
Since I'm one of the ones that threw this at NGNG, I'll be buying one in the near future.. Though anything beyond 25% better/worse of anything is always questionable (in regards to the external heat transfer).
Edited by Koniving, 05 August 2014 - 12:45 PM.
#73
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:52 AM
#74
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:53 AM
Quickdraw Crobat, on 05 August 2014 - 11:43 AM, said:
You've missed my point at least, probably that of anyone else you're arguing against as well.
No. I got your point. I was just pointing out why you have so many players going "eh" to a mech that lacks ballistics. The Stalker was very much the same way. An energy/missile platform. But it got a hero mech with a ballistic slot. It quickly became very popular and is now, arguably I'm sure, considered by many to be the best Stalker chassis.
My whole point in all of this, in the end, is that I find it telling of the current state of the game that ballistic slots are so valued in a mech. I'm not particularly happy with this state, mind you. I think the Devs have over-nerfed energy weapons through heat in their round-about, indirect as they can effort to nerf to the PPC. Which did very little to nerf the PPC and just put the hurt on the other energy weapons. But that is a whole other post and subject.
So, I didn't miss your point. It's a valid fluff and lore based opinion. As for sales and combat effectiveness in MWO, however, lack of ballistics means it takes one on the nose.
Edited by Kommisar, 05 August 2014 - 11:57 AM.
#75
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:54 AM
Will probably pick one up once I am through playing with my Clan Mechs.
#76
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:59 AM
Another hero that the hard-core seraph kiddies can't (won't be able to) pilot.
Whelp, dedication to the cause or whatever.
#77
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:02 PM
Kommisar, on 05 August 2014 - 11:53 AM, said:
No. I got your point. I was just pointing out why you have so many players going "eh" to a mech that lacks ballistics. The Stalker was very much the same way. An energy/missile platform. But it got a hero mech with a ballistic slot. It quickly became very popular and is now, arguably I'm sure, considered by many to be the best Stalker chassis.
My whole point in all of this, in the end, is that I find it telling of the current state of the game that ballistic slots are so valued in a mech. I'm not particularly happy with this state, mind you. I think the Devs have over-nerfed energy weapons through heat in their round-about, indirect as they can effort to nerf to the PPC. Which did very little to nerf the PPC and just put the hurt on the other energy weapons. But that is a whole other post and subject.
So, I didn't miss your point. It's a valid fluff and lore based opinion. As for sales and combat effectiveness in MWO, however, lack of ballistics means it takes one on the nose.
Ah. It seemed like you were arguing that it should have had ballistic slots, not that ballistic slots would have made it more popular.
#78
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:16 PM
Personally, I would have loved a Battlemaster with 2 high mounted ballistic slots. As an IS pilot, it would become my clan-buster mech of choice. At the same time, I disagree with how the Devs have made ballistics; with their low heat, good range, front loaded damage, and enough shots per ton of ammo to not be a real issue; to be so much more valuable than energy weapons.
#79
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:17 PM
LakeDaemon, on 05 August 2014 - 11:04 AM, said:
Hhahahahahahhahhahaahahhhahhahhahahahhahahah
I just found that Firebrand bashing on the forum
Man I can't believe that is real
#80
Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:19 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users