

Solaris Arena
#1
Posted 06 August 2014 - 08:16 PM
#2
Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:31 PM
#3
Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:35 PM
#4
Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:51 PM
gibe pls
#5
Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:58 PM
Sandpit, on 06 August 2014 - 09:31 PM, said:
problem with putting it into public matches would be it will have to be a open weight class and you know everybody wants to bring that direwolf or timberwolf

#6
Posted 06 August 2014 - 10:00 PM

#7
Posted 06 August 2014 - 10:06 PM
XxmadcatxX, on 06 August 2014 - 09:58 PM, said:

true but just do it anyhow, i think you'd see some interesting mechs taken in an FFA situation
#8
Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:23 PM
#9
Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:32 PM
The more modes, the less balanced matchmaker gets in the main game (solo queue and less than 12 queues).
#10
Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:47 PM
Funkadelic Mayhem, on 07 August 2014 - 12:32 PM, said:
The more modes, the less balanced matchmaker gets in the main game (solo queue and less than 12 queues).
You mean like they will NEVER do
coolant flush
3pv
clans before cw?
for the new and selective memory folk around here

plus, they have specifically stated on twitter, that they like the idea of a Solaris type mode for just this type of thing.
Edited by Sandpit, 07 August 2014 - 12:47 PM.
#11
Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:52 PM
XxmadcatxX, on 06 August 2014 - 09:58 PM, said:

That's fine by me. I'll let them blow the limbs off each other while I patiently wait and kill the last surviving and heavily damaged opponent for the win. <maniacal



#12
Posted 07 August 2014 - 12:56 PM
Funkadelic Mayhem, on 07 August 2014 - 12:32 PM, said:
Fast forward to 2016:
PGI: "Buy our new Solaris package, only $500 to play in Solaris with special Solaris mechs."
Fans: "But you said there would never be FFA game mode!"
PGI: "That was our position at the time."

They'll do anything if there's enough money in it, at any given time. What they've said in the past is completely irrelevant, at all times.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users