Public Test - Mass Production / Hyperpulse Transmitted - Industrial Map Feedback
#41
Posted 21 August 2014 - 10:26 PM
In terms of aesthetics, the map looks a bit lazy in that the reuse of assets from the other maps is too obvious. The whole thing lacks any interesting terrain features and is rather forgettable.
#42
Posted 21 August 2014 - 10:51 PM
#43
Posted 21 August 2014 - 11:07 PM
Love the little details like the flames and the Mech Hanger/Factory. Serious lag issues but unable to tell if that was a map issue or connectivity.
#44
Posted 21 August 2014 - 11:27 PM
#45
Posted 22 August 2014 - 02:23 AM
The size is small and Mechs arrive any map location in very short time.
JJs be a big advantage.
#46
Posted 22 August 2014 - 02:42 AM
Negative: A lot of the cover looks like it will not block LRMs well. This may be a problem if they keep the steep attack angle. We clearly need to be able to shoot the lights off now. Asset reuse could have been lower -- there is room for more diversity.
Not sure yet: Depending on how it plays, it may be too small for a decent capping game on conquest. Too many maps force a central brawl almost every match. Maybe not all buildings should be this easy to hop on/over.
#47
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:17 AM
#48
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:17 AM
That is about River City, 1-2fps slower. (Most of the old maps are around that level)
I had weird fps drops when moving around the cockpit. I know this from other maps, but not so often and dramatically.
Layout: Seems to be a map for surprises, lots of hiding places.
Buildings look very big, Mechs slow compared to other maps. With several JJs you should be a good spotter and harasser.
The light at some buildings is strangely dark.
I havent seen much of the map, but the "pits" seems to be there just for beeing there, no in-game logical reason.
#49
Posted 22 August 2014 - 04:56 AM
#50
Posted 22 August 2014 - 05:19 AM
#51
Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:12 AM
I like the erie lighting, and shadows, and the ability to use all three visions modes. I reported one area where the modes were not working correctly, but still like that you can hid in a shadow and pop out at someone.
The size of the map also works well. You can have fights in lots of different areas that make it feel like you are not on just one map.
What would be nice addition and up the chaos factor even more would be some volatile gas drums sitting about. Hit one and cause an explosion. Have them randomly place so they are not in the same place all the time. and they don't show up as a target like a turret. Just part of the background until a stray laser hits one and sets it off.
#52
Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:29 AM
#53
Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:34 AM
So far, the map seems to be making up for the stale gameplay and one overused tactic on all the others. There's nothing quite like the ability to flank on this map. See your teammates getting pounded, so you come around the side with your lance, guns blazing, great fun.
I really do hope we don't get into a funk with this one though, as there are so many paths and battleplans to choose from, would be a shame to see gameplay stick to certain areas only.
Played around with some of the Tier 5 weapon modules. Are these the ones that will make it into the final release? They seem decent enough, 50m of range without heat is certainly handy to have.
I didn't get to test it, but will the AMS and NARC modules be getting 5 tiers as well?
Edited by xeromynd, 22 August 2014 - 06:42 AM.
#54
Posted 22 August 2014 - 06:37 AM
I, for one, hope this becomes the minimum size for all maps.
Aesthetically, I very much loved the industrial layout. Yellow tinted floodlights, girders and burning oil vents just seemed to bring back that late 80's early 90's feel which is consistent with Battletech in my humble opinion.
However, it might be a bit TOO busy. After successive drops I felt a bit disorientated and found it difficult to pay attention to my surroundings. This might not happen to me in the future, when this map is part of a rotation with other maps, and I testing doesn't motivate me to play for many hours beyond my normal sessions.
My friend and I observed a timberwolf become stuck at 2240 2955.
#55
Posted 22 August 2014 - 08:19 AM
#56
Posted 22 August 2014 - 08:29 AM
Overall I like the map, and can't wait for it to hit production!
#57
Posted 22 August 2014 - 09:20 AM
1)Light and map geometry. Go on, just tell us - is that a "just another work day(night)" of that factory or it was evacuated? In 1st care - lights are wery few, inb 2nd - too much with no sight of emergency lights. And by the way - where did you see factory with no fence?.. Never saw this. Also never saw a factory with no lights at perimeter. Ok, lets imagine that maned problem are ok but look at whole map - there are a lot of places where light just going out of nowhere! All those tunnels, espesialy with green light... Come on - tunnels with a ights and with no light sources?.. Some textures are glowing from inside with no reason. Look closer to river sity night - much better with lights. And pay some attention to roads - they are wery poor on lights, like there are no roads at all, and all factory workers-machines are roaming how they own like...
2)Too many unused space around - only HPG have some, while other maps - dont. Its big, and, maybe, conquest will use more then 50% of that map, but as it is(was) now at test server - too many "free" space with a lot of buildings on it.
IMHO.
P.S. and make some use of highgrounds - gotstrong feeling that whole map is a flat field /with some buildings on it/...
Edited by MGA121285, 22 August 2014 - 09:24 AM.
#58
Posted 22 August 2014 - 09:33 AM
As for technical issues, I had several times where my video would freeze again. I've had this happen before, but it was back in spades last night. As before, it could be corrected by opening task manager, but this could be a problem if it's propagated to the live servers again.
I don't know why, but even after joining a unit, all I got was a black screen on the IS map page. I got to play around a bit with unit creation, but not a lot, so I don't have much to add there.
Lastly, I don't like that the weapon modules have no downside. They really should retain heat penalties so there's a tradeoff. Moreover, the penalties shouldn't necessarily always be heat. Maybe there's a damage module that gives a range penalty, or a lowered cooldown module that reduces damage. These sorts of choices would make the weapon modules compelling and nuanced.
Edited by Gallowglas, 22 August 2014 - 09:36 AM.
#59
Posted 22 August 2014 - 12:29 PM
other than tat nice job keep up the great work.
PS more new mech types please.
#60
Posted 22 August 2014 - 12:32 PM
Looks like MWO's first dedicated brawling map.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users