Dihm, on 10 August 2012 - 06:16 AM, said:
Sinitron.
You need to gain a better grasp of the distinction between role-playing and not. You're "role-playing" with yourself here. We aren't role-playing with you.
The forums are not a role-playing game. These are not the RP forums, they are the Faction forums. None of us are talking to you "in-character". Please drop the act when you try to have "serious debates" with us, so that we are all on the same page.
Like many of you, I am sick and tired of being misinformed and disinformed by the Skjaldborg. That's why I'm writing this letter, to tell the truth about the Skjaldborg. Consider this letter not as a monologue but rather as a joint effort between writer and reader. Together we shall take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of the Skjaldborg and its encomiasts and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. Together we shall ratchet up our level of understanding. And together we shall mention a bit about childish jerks such as the Skjaldborg.
There are rumors circulating that the Skjaldborg's initiatives are nothing shy of a slap in the face to all those who have fought and fallen in war for this country, so let me just clarify something: The Skjaldborg always cavils at my attempts to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. That's probably because nobody ever went broke underestimating the Skjaldborg's intelligence. (Note the heroic restraint stopping me from saying that the Skjaldborg's goal is to bathe in splendor while the rest of us go to work in the mines.) Does the Skjaldborg do research before it reports things, or does it just guess and hope it's right? The reason I ask is that the Skjaldborg has repeatedly indicated a desire to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that the Skjaldborg's epigones so frequently attribute to the Skjaldborg? The disruptive blathering of a foolhardy, scabrous brownshirt is more like it. In fact, if it turns out that there's no way to prevent the Skjaldborg from acquiring power and using it to indoctrinate self-indulgent gasbags then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to break away from the peloton and exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage and accept the fact that it says it's going to pursue a twofold credo of parasitism and sciolism in the blink of an eye. Is it out of its randy mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that it has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging its morals. On all of these occasions I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that there is no place in this country where we are safe from its spin doctors, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack.
The Skjaldborg often argues that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known smear merchant and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that the Skjaldborg's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. The Skjaldborg holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City—sterile obstacles to progress who create a beachhead for organized quislingism. Some oppugnant practitioners of warlordism are actually considering helping the Skjaldborg implement an untrustworthy parody of justice called "the Skjaldborg-ism". How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by the Skjaldborg on numerous occasions.
The struggle against the worst classes of crime-stained dingbats I've ever seen must be a struggle against feudalism, pharisaism, and jingoism, or it is doomed to failure. The Skjaldborg has produced a large number of hate-filled inveracities. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that the Skjaldborg never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. It presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, it seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that we must dole out acerbic criticism of the Skjaldborg and its phalanx of shiftless representatives. Our children depend on that.
The Skjaldborg makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant's mother. Consider, for example, the Skjaldborg's claim that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to its demands. The fact of the matter is that some people don't seem to mind that it likes to enable abhorrent misfits to punch above their weight. What a mawkish world we live in! I'm merely suggesting that the Skjaldborg wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If the Skjaldborg really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that it is not just lusk. It is unbelievably, astronomically lusk.
The Skjaldborg has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and destabilize society—all by trumping up a phony emergency. Sadly, in once sense, the Skjaldborg is correct. If we let it manufacture outrage at its foes by attributing to them all sorts of barbaric obloquies, then I will honestly be forced to serve as a human shield for its bombardments. The Skjaldborg's ignorance is encyclopedic—an instructive warning for the future. The Skjaldborg's ruminations are not so much a nationalist as a neo-imperialist attempt to show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. I'll go further: We can disagree with it without being disagreeable. For instance, I would like to politely disagree with some of the Skjaldborg's campaigns by pointing out that it is thoroughly versipellous. When the Skjaldborg is among plebeians, it warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against racism. But when it's safely surrounded by its fans, the Skjaldborg instructs them to further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that I'm convinced that the Skjaldborg will fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries faster than you can say "electrotelethermometer". No, I'm not in tinfoil-hat land; I have abundant evidence from reliable sources that this is the case. For instance, the Skjaldborg wants to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. Faugh.
The Skjaldborg maintains that truth is merely a social construct. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that I've managed to come up with a way in which its essays could be made useful. The Skjaldborg's essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that the Skjaldborg should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.
It would stand to reason that the virus of jujuism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to the Skjaldborg's malisons, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that in public, the Skjaldborg promises that it'd never get as many people as possible to line up behind the geek-tent barkers at the latest and greatest carnival of interdenominationalism. In private, however, it secretly tells its bootlickers that it'll do exactly that. I think we've seen this movie before: It's called Business as Usual for the Skjaldborg.
I do not have the time in one sitting to go into the long answer as to why the Skjaldborg treats serious issues callously and somewhat flippantly. But the short answer is that like many possession-obsessed, atrabilious reprobates, it ignores the realities that contradict its wishful thinking, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Here's some news for you: The Skjaldborg relies on stichomancy to "prove", inter alia, that skin color means more than skill, and gender is more impressive than genius. Interesting, isn't it? What you may find even more interesting is that it drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes the Skjaldborg sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that I can't understand why it has to be so homicidal. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside its head and is making it trade fundamental human rights for a cheap "guarantee" of safety and security. It's a bit more likely, however, that I want you to know that its circulars smack of commercialism. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by the Skjaldborg because they saw no other options for change.
The fault, dear the Skjaldborg, is not in your stars but in yourself. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but sometimes I think that the Skjaldborg is simply a willing pawn of those detestable buffoons who clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. I typically drop that willing-pawn notion, however, whenever I remember that if I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to admonish the Skjaldborg not seven times, but seventy times seven. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that the Skjaldborg cannot tolerate the world as it is. It needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, the Skjaldborg, in its typical dereliction-of-duty mode, is trying hard to extirpate the things that I cherish. I mean, think about it. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call it by name. That name is the Skjaldborg.
Edited by Sinitron, 11 August 2012 - 09:55 AM.