Jump to content

Restricting Coffer Donations


4 replies to this topic

#1 Dirk Le Daring

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,083 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 26 August 2014 - 11:10 PM

I had a concern regarding coffer donations, and would like to suggest a restriction option.

In my opinion it would be a good thing to be able to prevent new recruits to a unit from donating to the coffer.

This would prevent new members from wasting their CBills through eagerness or misunderstanding. I just would like to see a safety net for those new to a unit. I understand that not all unit commanders would utilise this idea, but I would certainly like to be able to do so.

Maybe implement it as a rank permission, that way a commander could set the rank and, thus the length of service to donate.

#2 AtomicFireMedic

    Rookie

  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 4 posts

Posted 26 August 2014 - 11:53 PM

I can see how this option would be good for the commander/officers to be able to utilize. I guess It would be better to just add something to the coffers screen to let people know that they cant get it back. I think that way everybody knows its gone forever.

#3 Dirk Le Daring

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,083 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:17 AM

Good suggestion Atomic, there can never be too many safety measures.

#4 Flying Fox 333

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 198 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 27 August 2014 - 03:48 AM

Good idea. Mostly to prevent people increasing their coffers by farming new accounts to take advantage of the cadet bonus to deposit in the coffers.

#5 DaisuSaikoro Nagasawa

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 973 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationTaipei, Taiwan

Posted 27 August 2014 - 05:12 AM

I do agree, perhaps placing a time restriction on collection. Even though some "new users" aren't new at all... that doesn't mean they are but regardless, I'm very much for protecting new users.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users