New Hero Mech Sparky Details
#41
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:03 AM
#43
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:06 AM
Redshift2k5, on 09 September 2014 - 10:36 AM, said:
It's a canon mech loadout iirc, you get what the lore says.
A more realistic MC cost wouldn't hurt (instead of flat rate per ton)
oh i understand that, it was more meant as a line upf or the cost question.
if they are going to charge the same levels for a hero with no upgrades than thats pretty F'd up or at least in those cases they should throw a bonus in like free mechbay with it to offset the added cost without ugprades
or just screw the lore and give it at least DHS
#44
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:06 AM
#46
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:08 AM
Bront, on 09 September 2014 - 10:55 AM, said:
http://mwomercs.com/...r-found-sept-5/
#47
#48
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:11 AM
#49
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:18 AM
/facedesk
Don't do me any favors PGI.
#51
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:26 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 09 September 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:
Well, considering it's literally a BJ-3 with lower arms with crazy articulation and the benefits of the Griffin design (crazy torso twist+nice engine cap)... it would put the Vindicator to shame.
#52
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:33 AM
#53
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:43 AM
i am real fan of the Griffin 3M. Actually we used them competition games like RHOD, because it is a very nice mech.
I have on my griffin 3M more than 800k xp, because i just love playing it...
I was wondering if there will ever be a griffin hero mech. And now here it is.
I was so looking foreward to this day!!!!
I look at the hardpoints, and i just asked WTF?
What skilled player would ever use that mech?
I just can say i am very disappointed... but i guess that´s because i was hoping for my most loved mech to get nice hero.
U couldn´t fail more...
I am sad now and will log off... hoping this is just a bad dream.....
#54
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:45 AM
That's so... wrong.
#55
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:48 AM
Veteran4568, on 09 September 2014 - 11:33 AM, said:
Respect to You!
#56
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:50 AM
Deathlike, on 09 September 2014 - 11:26 AM, said:
Well, considering it's literally a BJ-3 with lower arms with crazy articulation and the benefits of the Griffin design (crazy torso twist+nice engine cap)... it would put the Vindicator to shame.
Can't believe they went all energy. No Missile, No Ballistic.
Bummer.
BJ-3 is a good comparison.
#57
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:53 AM
Then I built this: SPARKY
Could also swap the lplas out for regular llas and go up to XL360 without dropping any heat sinks or the mediums -- SPARKY
Almost makes me want to buy my Griffins back to grind them out. Almost.
Might make a decent zombie mech with a standard engine. I literally don't see enough griffins to know if they get killed through CT before their sides go out or not though.
Edited by Kassatsu, 09 September 2014 - 11:55 AM.
#58
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:57 AM
CinRa, on 09 September 2014 - 11:43 AM, said:
What skilled player would ever use that mech?
Why? Faster laserboats are pretty useful. Could have been a poptart with the high mounted Torso mounts, or a good light hunter with a 360XL in it, or a fun Wub boat with 6 MPLs.
Then again, most competitive players thought he Griffins were going to be junk in the first place.
Edit:
This looks scary: SPARKY
Edited by Bront, 09 September 2014 - 12:00 PM.
#59
Posted 09 September 2014 - 11:58 AM
Bront, on 09 September 2014 - 11:57 AM, said:
Most "competitive" players care only for how quickly their mechs can core out an enemy CT in a zerg rush.
Or how good of a poptart it can be.
#60
Posted 09 September 2014 - 12:06 PM
That's pretty rich for an MC-only Mech
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users