Jump to content

Electing A Player "council" Of Sorts


1306 replies to this topic

#101 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,260 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM

Yes just to clarify, the council is there to sort out ideas, and put a list of ideas on paper for the community to vote yay or nay on correct? I don't think anyone wants them to have the final say without community input.

#102 SilentWolff

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 2,174 posts
  • LocationNew Las Vegas

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM

I see alot of people posting what cant be done/ wont work. That gets us no where. If you dont like the idea of a counsel, then give us other constructive ideas on what you think might work.

#103 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM

View PostTolkien, on 12 September 2014 - 01:30 PM, said:


You only think this is a bad idea because you think the forums are too hard on PGI. Wake up, the entire internet understands PGI has failed with MWO so far and that is why their space game has made less than 3% of the targeted goal in the last 24 hours.

PGI needs to start listening to people who will tell them like it is (e.g. Anders, Standing Cow, Vassago Rain) not the hugbox from NGNG. Otherwise we will get more of this:



The forums aren't representative of the player base. Never have been, never will be. The forums only represent the people who have nothing better to do than post on forums.

95% of the player base never even comes here. 95% of the council should match that demographic.

#104 Punkass

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:32 PM

View PostHeffay, on 12 September 2014 - 01:29 PM, said:


I'm pretty sure at least 3 of the 5 listed there have advocated for PGI to go hang themselves. I don't think we should have a council where the majority of the members are only going to vote "Sell the IP" over and over and over again.

Sooner vote for them than you.

#105 Tolkien

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:32 PM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:

Yes just to clarify, the council is there to sort out ideas, and put a list of ideas on paper for the community to vote yay or nay on correct? I don't think anyone wants them to have the final say without community input.


The council also needs to be able to override the developers past or future decisions. Seriously, otherwise we will end up with another 3pv where 90+% of the voting forum population was against it and it still got rammed through.
Posted Image

#106 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:33 PM

View PostMischiefSC, on 12 September 2014 - 01:30 PM, said:


Every democracy and representative republic in the world is based off of counting votes from the people who care to vote.

If someone doesn't get engaged enough to come to forums and read these threads then... well, too bad so sad.

Random selection is also a bad idea for the same reason no active society does it for governance - you're too likely to get uninterested people or people lacking the basic skills to get an idea forward.

These people are not being elected to have executive authority over the lives of every player in MW:O. This is just the folks we selecting to try and refine down the static and volume of general opinions into something that can reasonably be discussed. The actual ECM changes should get their own popular vote - the point of the council is just to refine down those suggestions into something we can legitimately vote on and speak with a single unified voice on behalf of the community to PGI.


Well then, maybe we should have 2 councils? The House and the Senate. One is elected, one is voted in. Balance of power. And an executive branch to sign or veto the ideas they send forward.

#107 Tolkien

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:34 PM

View PostHeffay, on 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:


The forums aren't representative of the player base. Never have been, never will be. The forums only represent the people who have nothing better to do than post on forums.

95% of the player base never even comes here. 95% of the council should match that demographic.


If they won't stand up to be counted here, they don't get to complain about the outcome. Just like voting in real life, half the country doesn't bother to show up, they don't get to complain.

Also you are the last person on earth whose opinion I would trust on what is on the minds of 95% of the player base, where to find them.

#108 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,260 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:35 PM

So, how do we engage the players who do not come on the forums? Put it as one of the ads as you start up the game?

#109 Tolkien

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:36 PM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 12 September 2014 - 01:35 PM, said:

So, how do we engage the players who do not come on the forums? Put it as one of the ads as you start up the game?


Not a bad idea at all. And if they still can't be bothered to come to the forums, we need not worry about them.

#110 BlakeAteIt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 394 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:36 PM

The #saveMWO thing. while ultimately not entirely successful, was pretty close to what we need now. If we can get a few of the people in charge of that working on this, it could be helpful. If nothingelse, they have experiance in getting many people from this game together.

#111 Asaru

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 231 posts
  • LocationMichigan

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:40 PM

I would like to suggest that we break up the nominating process into some sub categories that way the broadest possible representation of the different community factions is possible.

So we would have one thread to nominate reps from the competitive groups, casual groups, solo players, battletech lore, and general gaming or whatever. Other wise it just to much noise in one thread.

#112 Son of the Flood

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Messenger
  • The Messenger
  • 397 posts
  • LocationTier 3 basement - searching for funyuns and mountain dew

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:40 PM

Redshift2k5, Koniving, Jody Von Jedi - While I don't know any of them personally, these guys are all over the new player section with constructive posts helpful to our community. Also, you cannot have a council without a Jedi on it. :)

I agree with others about needing some way to reach out to non-forum goers in the game client somehow to give them a chance to comment.

#113 Punkass

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:40 PM

View PostHeffay, on 12 September 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:


The forums aren't representative of the player base. Never have been, never will be. The forums only represent the people who have nothing better to do than post on forums.

95% of the player base never even comes here. 95% of the council should match that demographic.

Ah, there's those statistics again. Remember, the 1% gives NO correlation between forum participation and game participation. It's just a ratio of participation on the forums.

Nice try though.

#114 DAYLEET

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 4,316 posts
  • LocationLinoleum.

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:41 PM

So was OP serious or on some serious meds?

As long as ecm is boosted and i can create council at will too im all for it.

#115 Tolkien

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:42 PM

View PostSon of the Flood, on 12 September 2014 - 01:40 PM, said:

Redshift2k5, Koniving, Jody Von Jedi - While I don't know any of them personally, these guys are all over the new player section with constructive posts helpful to our community. Also, you cannot have a council without a Jedi on it. :)

I agree with others about needing some way to reach out to non-forum goers in the game client somehow to give them a chance to comment.



The council also needs to have enough members to represent a diverse cross section (5-7 players at least), a private area of the forums to deliberate undisturbed, and the ability to override developer decisions on features past present or future. Seriously otherwise the council will just be ignored like the secret squirrels were, or the vast majority of the player base was when PGI thought they could get away with it: Posted Image

#116 Training Instructor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,218 posts
  • LocationMoscow

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:44 PM

View Post3rdworld, on 12 September 2014 - 01:28 PM, said:



That is who should be balancing the game. Random scrubs.

And people wonder why this forum is a complete waste of time.


Most of the coaches of successful college and NFL teams weren't particularly good players themselves. Same for baseball and basketball.

Some of those guys who get splattered by competitive teams understand more about the game and overall balance than competitive players do. Just because they don't have lightning reflexes and the ability to sit in one position until someone tells them to move and fire at target X doesn't mean that they don't have the ability to analyze and draw correct conclusions about game mechanics, weapon characteristics, tactics, map balance, etc.

Nothing funnier than playing 12 mans and coming across a team talking a bunch of trash, when in reality they're being carried by 2-4 exceptional players. I believe the logical fallacy is false attribution, or something along those lines.

#117 stjobe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,498 posts
  • LocationOn your six, chipping away at your rear armour.

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:45 PM

View PostDAYLEET, on 12 September 2014 - 01:41 PM, said:

So was OP serious or on some serious meds?

In case you missed it, Russ basically said "You want ECM changed? Tell me how to do it and I'll do it".

Edit: That link should probably be in the OP, come to think of it :)

Edited by stjobe, 12 September 2014 - 01:45 PM.


#118 DAYLEET

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 4,316 posts
  • LocationLinoleum.

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:48 PM

View Poststjobe, on 12 September 2014 - 01:45 PM, said:

In case you missed it, Russ basically said "You want ECM changed? Tell me how to do it and I'll do it".

Edit: That link should probably be in the OP, come to think of it :)

Ok so he was serious! lol. Can't wait to see ecm get useless... seems like a terrible move, if he follows it the mass will be even worse about buffing themselves and nerfing the guy in front of them.

Edited by DAYLEET, 12 September 2014 - 01:54 PM.


#119 Dark Jackal

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Vicious
  • The Vicious
  • 187 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:51 PM

I'm not sure what benefit this will provide. PGI does read the posts as I'm aware even if they don't necessarily reply to everyone every time someone raises an issue. So, I'm not sure where this is going to make up for anything.

#120 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 12 September 2014 - 01:53 PM

Quote

When considering the above, the council obviously needs the power to veto additions or removals of features. Seriously. Otherwise what is the point of the council other than to be ignored when convenient.


Yeah no. The council should have no real power. Because individuals always have biased agendas. I dont even like calling it a "council" as that implies a governing body. I think just "volunteers" is fine.

All decision-making needs to be made by the community itself through polling. All the "council" should do is make sure the best ideas get added to the poll and the worst ideas dont get put on it.

Quote

I'm not sure what benefit this will provide. PGI does read the posts as I'm aware even if they don't necessarily reply to everyone every time someone raises an issue. So, I'm not sure where this is going to make up for anything.


The benefit is that the better ideas on the forums are more likely to get brought to PGI's attention. Right now theres a lot of good ideas that seep through the cracks. But more than that it can help PGI prioritize what features the community wants more than others.

Edited by Khobai, 12 September 2014 - 02:03 PM.






9 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users