Can Anyone Explain This Damage Score To Me?
#1
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:27 AM
I focused and shot out the Phract's right torso. It took about 7 volleys of 6UAC5s to do it (which seemed a lot).
Immediately after I killed the Phract, I was killed from behind, end of match.
The post-match score screen showed I had done 348 damage. Yet that Cataphract was the only target I'd shot at. No other targets, no use of strikes.
How could I have done 348 damage, and why did it take so many 6UAC5 volleys to kill that Cataphract?
Any suggestions on how that works out? Thanks.
#2
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:28 AM
#3
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:31 AM
In practice? No idea, except that you can't have hit just that side torso, possibly due to server/client desyncing?
Edited by stjobe, 14 September 2014 - 09:31 AM.
#4
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:31 AM
Edited by EgoSlayer, 14 September 2014 - 09:32 AM.
#5
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:32 AM
Luckly, it doesn't happen all that often but it absolutely does happen and when it does, it is beyond frustrating.
#6
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:32 AM
#7
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:33 AM
90 IS+A for the STs and 132 for the CT. Add arms and legs for twisting and JJ defense, and you can spread cACs pretty easily.
If it was an XL, that's a bit harder to do, but not impossible. Perhaps you found a competent player.
#8
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:40 AM
I have seen this with LBX10's on my Illya, and almost all the time with lasers.
HSR favors one hit weapons like PPC and IS AC. That has been in indirect driver for the meta for years. Lasers and it's like do 0-100% of dmg on any given shot. It is always better to do 100% of the dmg most of the time then random% of dmg all the time in a game like this, dependability and predictability of the dmg you will do for the risk you put out is supreme in positioning and planning your actions.
So what you see, has been happening for years. Most have never noticed.
#9
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:46 AM
Appogee, on 14 September 2014 - 09:27 AM, said:
I focused and shot out the Phract's right torso. It took about 7 volleys of 6UAC5s to do it (which seemed a lot).
Immediately after I killed the Phract, I was killed from behind, end of match.
The post-match score screen showed I had done 348 damage. Yet that Cataphract was the only target I'd shot at. No other targets, no use of strikes.
How could I have done 348 damage, and why did it take so many 6UAC5 volleys to kill that Cataphract?
Any suggestions on how that works out? Thanks.
Hey I did 505 damage to a single mech but it survived, as written in the thread below. How about we both just admit to being lousy shots?
http://mwomercs.com/...t-damage-dealt/
Edited by El Bandito, 14 September 2014 - 09:49 AM.
#10
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:47 AM
#11
Posted 14 September 2014 - 09:49 AM
#12
Posted 14 September 2014 - 10:27 AM
#13
Posted 14 September 2014 - 12:27 PM
stjobe, on 14 September 2014 - 09:31 AM, said:
In practice? No idea, except that you can't have hit just that side torso, possibly due to server/client desyncing?
I'm pretty sure I wasn't spraying it around THAT much Even if lag meant I missed the RT at the very most it should have sprayed onto the CT. But there was still a LOT of damage registered higher than that (and yet it seemed to take a long time for him to drop).
El Bandito, on 14 September 2014 - 09:46 AM, said:
I guess it has to be components/crits and other stuff.
The thing that doesn't fit that description though is why it took so many salvos to take him down.
Edited by Appogee, 14 September 2014 - 12:27 PM.
#14
Posted 14 September 2014 - 12:29 PM
Appogee, on 14 September 2014 - 12:27 PM, said:
I had several team mates spectating as I was last Mech to die. They saw me hitting the target.
I guess it has to be components/crits and other stuff.
The thing that doesn't fit that description though is why it took so many salvos to take him down.
There's a big difference between hitting a target and hitting a target in the component you need to kill it.
#15
Posted 14 September 2014 - 12:31 PM
Mcgral18, on 14 September 2014 - 09:33 AM, said:
Eldagore, on 14 September 2014 - 09:40 AM, said:
Thanks everyone for your comments.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users