Jump to content

Where The Mad Dog (Vulture) Went Oh So Wrong. Offically Closed! Problem Fixed!


223 replies to this topic

#41 Xyroc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 855 posts
  • LocationFighting the Clan Invasion

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:30 AM

Change the width of the legs sure.

Needing long barrels on the arms purely astetic and doesnt need to be changed IMO.

The current model looks great it shouldnt change.

#42 MeiSooHaityu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 10,912 posts
  • LocationMI

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:32 AM

View PostAnarcho, on 24 September 2014 - 07:27 AM, said:

They do... every time I go to sarna for some info I laugh and thank god for the new re-designs...


There is some charm to the old designs :) Look at that Quickdraw, he is just yelling..."Come at me Bro!"

Posted Image
LOL

I can understand some of the old IS mechs (they do look dated), but the Clan mechs are designed pretty nice. I think the designs of the clanners mechs hold up well.

It's all a matter of opinion anyway.

#43 Augustus Martelus II

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 476 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMontréal, QC Canada

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:33 AM

3Xsrm4 i mean

#44 Davegt27

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,020 posts
  • LocationCO

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:35 AM

epic fail they obviously got it wrong since there is not enough crying on the forums about it

they should have added a AC hard point on one side of the head and a laser hard point on the other side

and when they cry about how over powered it is then you know you got it right

how about a monster Mad Dog with arms going up you know a four armed monster :)

#45 Xyroc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 855 posts
  • LocationFighting the Clan Invasion

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:35 AM

View PostLily from animove, on 24 September 2014 - 07:27 AM, said:

the issue with the current legs is earodynamic. These mechs run 90kph, thats quite fast so they would have a bit more areodynamic designs from the front vew, because currently they would hinder the mechs speed a lot by being such a huge flat area.

The original legs were well shaped in earodynamic ways and got their durability by some depth.


Yes 90kph or only a measly 56mph .. thats not too fast.

Have you seen these before?

Posted Image

Large flat surface area but moves much fast than 90kph

Edited by Beliall, 24 September 2014 - 07:37 AM.


#46 shadin

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 60 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:37 AM

I like the look of the mad dog, but yea the barrels are just too stubby. I also miss my PPC cannons on my K2.


#47 Brody319

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ominous
  • The Ominous
  • 6,273 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:37 AM

Looks the same as the pictures to me

#48 Scratx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 3,283 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:38 AM

View PostAnarcho, on 24 September 2014 - 07:27 AM, said:

They do... every time I go to sarna for some info I laugh and thank god for the new re-designs...


While I'll second you for a lot of mechs, I must respectfully disagree on quite a few others.

There's no need to re-design for the sake of redesigning. I don't doubt PGI had reasons for many of the differences (let's be fair here, it's not just aesthetic reasons that drive the creative process, it's also functional, technical and administrative reasons), but that does mean there'll always be a risk of making changes that players don't like.

The OP pointed out a few things he doesn't like and said how he thought they could be tweaked to make the Mad Dog look more like the Mad Dog in canon. Nothing wrong with that. :)

#49 Augustus Martelus II

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 476 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMontréal, QC Canada

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:43 AM

And i don't know if it's me but there's a hitbox problem with it :s

#50 Ozric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 1,188 posts
  • LocationSunny Southsea

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:43 AM

Thanks for this thread. I have been trying to build myself up to posting something very similar but I'm still a bit too sore about things, petty as that may be. Instead I bought a Dire Wolf and have been banging my head against that slice of dingoes kidneys to take my mind off it (needs to be at least 25 tons lighter really...)

Rather than risk an accidental rant, I will bullet point my bullet points in favour of this argument, for the good of everyone.


1 - Mad Dog design good in many respects, and kudos was gained for adding the chassis to the game. However...

2 - Arms/barrels too short (stubby) and arms too wide. A important aspect of the design in many pilots eyes, the classic silhouette is undeniably destroyed by this design choice. It's at least as bad as MW4.

3 - Legs too fat. See above.

4 - No C variant. Maybe a blessing in disguise? For the C to be truly viable it would need the alternate (higher) ballistic arm pods anyway, and really long barrels. Gauss lances basically.

5 - The concept art was really good! What in the ten hells happened?

#51 Asyres

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 433 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:52 AM

View PostLily from animove, on 24 September 2014 - 07:27 AM, said:

the issue with the current legs is earodynamic. These mechs run 90kph, thats quite fast so they would have a bit more areodynamic designs from the front vew, because currently they would hinder the mechs speed a lot by being such a huge flat area.

The original legs were well shaped in earodynamic ways and got their durability by some depth.


I have two problems with this. First, 90 kph isn't that fast, in the scheme of things. Second, if you start applying real world physics to giant space robots, everything starts to fall apart really fast.

EDIT:

View PostOzric, on 24 September 2014 - 07:43 AM, said:

4 - No C variant. Maybe a blessing in disguise? For the C to be truly viable it would need the alternate (higher) ballistic arm pods anyway, and really long barrels. Gauss lances basically.


I'm not sure the C would have been decent, anyway. You'd either have too little ammo, or too little armor, or (more likely) both.

Edited by Asyres, 24 September 2014 - 07:54 AM.


#52 Foksuh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 132 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:54 AM

The old pictures/designs.. yeah. A lot of them make me shudder. Shame they couldn't pay for a proper artist back in the day :P

#53 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:55 AM

View PostOzric, on 24 September 2014 - 07:43 AM, said:


5 - The concept art was really good! What in the ten hells happened?


Limitations with the game engine would be my guess...

That or having to use some parts from mechs that it shares those parts with, like the legs of the Timber Wolf...

Surprisingly I find that it has decent hit boxes and good survivability with the way that Clan XL engines work, took a few shots from a dual gauss War Hawk to lay them out, when I fought against SRM36 vomit ones last night. And with only 60 less max armour than a Timber Wolf, they can take a beating too.

#54 Jetfire

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,746 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:57 AM

I really like the design, while the old long arms look cool... they would get shot off much faster like the Misery ST.

#55 Hagoromo Gitsune

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts
  • LocationLuthien, Draconic Combine, outscirts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:01 AM

Hitbox problem? OH, LOL.

Check this out, there is some bigger problem comming your way...


MDD-A

MDD-A

:rolleyes:

#56 Thunder Lips Express

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 905 posts
  • LocationFrom parts unknown

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:04 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 24 September 2014 - 05:08 AM, said:

So. Mad Dog was pre-released for those who doubled up on the Clan Maxi-Packs. Totally unsolicited, and unnecessary little perk PGI put out there. So thanks for that. It will be available to the masses for MC in December, Cbills in January.

So considering the way in which we have gotten it, being heavily critical of the design may seem highly ungrateful. But, there is just so many things, that have gone so wrong, in the in game model, both from the original design, and Alex's gorgeous re-imagining.

Let us begin:
Posted Image

The Vulture- One of the most visually arresting designs in the classic Battletech game.
Posted Image
Posted Image

Several design elements of note:
Slender, but tall profile. Long/Deep torso
Long arm weapons barrels
Deeply flexed, ostrich legs.
Shoulders far behind hips.
Posted Image
The issues:
1) The deep but slender profile was changed to a much stubbier version. This is actually understandable, and much more survivable, fro side shots, than the original, much as the way the bullet snout of the Timber Wolf was reined in.

2) Long weapon arms? Nope. Stubby as heck. PGI modelers have done a lot of things right in this game, but the dynamic weapons are very hit and miss. In this instance, even using the generic "box" lasers, they are at the least, 2-3 times too short in barrel length. The PPC also could use a boost. This also largely points out the ludicrous nature of using the same little barrel for a .5 ton Small Laser and a 7 Ton Large Pulse Laser.

3) The Legs. IMO, the biggest deal breaker. 12-15 too large in general, and certainly 10% too thick in the thighs. I get that they followed the lore premise of re-using the legs from the Timberwolf (though even on the Timby they are borderline too thick). No, for me, the biggest issue is the posture. Far too erect and upright. Look at the original design, and it is deeply flexed, dynamic, looking ready to spring into motion. This one might actually be pretty easy to fix. Even if they simply re-rig the legs to a deeper bow, it would do wonders for the look, and perceived size, of the mech. Hardest part would probably be re-doing the walking animation.

4) The Shoulder placement. It is behind the hips. Perhaps, visually it would look nicer, further back, but with the changes made for viability, it would also probably expose the side torso to easier shots. So IMO; it's livable.

TR;DR:
Russ, not to sound ungrateful, but is there any way to have the weapon barrels looked into and given more of the flavor of the mech? And while a rescaling of the legs by 12.5% would be preferred, would it be too difficult to have the legs re-rigged (and walk re-done) to give the "proper" bowed look and gait to the Mad Dog?


I own that old armourcast mad dog :)

#57 Utilyan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 1,252 posts

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:18 AM

Posted Image




The MAD DOG is PERFECT. Its suppose to have the same legs. Lore explains this. Without a doubt it is the most beautiful mech in game right now.



Sorry I think some folks are like this girl asking if her new outfit makes her look fat:

Posted Image




PS. there is something about mechs in this post too. :rolleyes:

Edited by Utilyan, 24 September 2014 - 08:19 AM.


#58 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:22 AM

View PostUtilyan, on 24 September 2014 - 08:18 AM, said:

Posted Image




The MAD DOG is PERFECT. Its suppose to have the same legs. Lore explains this. Without a doubt it is the most beautiful mech in game right now.



Sorry I think some folks are like this girl asking if her new outfit makes her look fat:

Posted Image




PS. there is something about mechs in this post too. :rolleyes:


Sorry I can't hear you over her ****....

#59 The Great Unwashed

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • Giant Helper
  • 919 posts
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:24 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 24 September 2014 - 05:08 AM, said:

[..] but is there any way to have the weapon barrels looked into and given more of the flavor of the mech?


How about making all pulse lasers have a long barrel so that you get some more visual variations on mechs?

(I think the Vulture looks really great though. A bit edgy but otherwise very nice)

Edited by The Great Unwashed, 24 September 2014 - 08:25 AM.


#60 SaltBeef

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Determined
  • The Determined
  • 2,081 posts
  • LocationOmni-mech cockpit.

Posted 24 September 2014 - 08:27 AM

I Actually like the mech. It is not as powerful as TW runs alot hotter , but when you finish modding it to at least 1.2 threshold for heat is managable. The stock setups are way to hot and light on armor distribution. They loose arms and torso rapidly so keep moving to stay in the fight also add a TC and Active probe for faster locks and ecm jamming bonuses. I would advise against running stock loadouts. Add the armor , lasers, missiles, the heatsinks and ammo.





14 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 14 guests, 0 anonymous users