

Group Size Is A Must Have.
#21
Posted 10 October 2014 - 07:59 PM
We got down to 4 activ Players because of the Limit.
Now we are back to 10 without the Limit.
Soo i realy hope the limits doesnt come back
#22
Posted 10 October 2014 - 08:04 PM
I need to start recording data when I drop in small groups but off the top of my head, it's above 50% when we get matched with a large group (our team is all <5 people groups, and I'm usually in a 2-4 man). And in that 50%, its about 75% we get rolled. NOT just lose, just plain old ***** and rolled.
So all you people who say that large groups are rare, I'm gonna need to see data from MORE THAN ONE person, or else you are just as full of **** as everybody else. Take a statistics or error course for Christ's sake. with no data, nobody has any say than opinion.
If you have a 10 man or whatever and have trouble finding matches after MM is altered to match similar group sizes, then you go to a private lobby. That's why they were given to us, that's why they are there. USE IT.
#23
Posted 10 October 2014 - 08:06 PM
TheRealAbray, on 10 October 2014 - 08:04 PM, said:
I need to start recording data when I drop in small groups but off the top of my head, it's above 50% when we get matched with a large group (our team is all <5 people groups, and I'm usually in a 2-4 man). And in that 50%, its about 75% we get rolled. NOT just lose, just plain old ***** and rolled.
So all you people who say that large groups are rare, I'm gonna need to see data from MORE THAN ONE person, or else you are just as full of **** as everybody else. Take a statistics or error course for Christ's sake. with no data, nobody has any say than opinion.
If you have a 10 man or whatever and have trouble finding matches after MM is altered to match similar group sizes, then you go to a private lobby. That's why they were given to us, that's why they are there. USE IT.
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__3758917
Your turn. Take my challenge.
Valore, on 24 September 2014 - 06:39 AM, said:
Small groups claim they're being destroyed by big groups all the time.
Yet dropping as a big group, I'd say only one out of 10 matches, we face another big group.
Both sides can't be telling the truth.
I'm more than happy to take up the following challenge from anyone who claims they only face big groups:
1. Play games in groups.
2. Take post-game screenshots. These must be validated as recent by you posting the word 'CHALLENGE' in chat before taking the screenshot.
3. Post all the screenshots here of all the big bad groups trashing you.
I'm willing to bet if I do this, I'll come up with more screenshots of me facing random mashup groups, than you will facing 12 man groups.
There. Challenge on the table. Anyone who still insists otherwise that there are millions of big organised groups ruining the group queue, go ahead. Take it up.
Not a single person has taken it up when push came to shove. It suddenly became 'too much of a hassle' lol.
Edited by Valore, 10 October 2014 - 08:07 PM.
#24
Posted 10 October 2014 - 08:21 PM
Valore, on 10 October 2014 - 07:50 PM, said:
Every time I get one of your groups on my team, and I ask if they're the competitive guys, they say no, they're the beer team, and we get steamrolled. Then the other side laughs at us because your guys were a 6 - 8 man, and the other side was a mashup of small groups

Please tell your comp guys to drop more.
You just can't help but be insulting, can you?

If they're under 12, it's probably a group pug that doesn't practice together and are just having fun, or a lance practice of 4, no drop deck, no battle calling.
#25
Posted 10 October 2014 - 08:31 PM
Kjudoon, on 10 October 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:
You just can't help but be insulting, can you?

If they're under 12, it's probably a group pug that doesn't practice together and are just having fun, or a lance practice of 4, no drop deck, no battle calling.
I wasn't being insulting, geez. You're thin skinned.

The other team was the one giving us grief, I was in like a 3 man, your guys were in a 6 man group, and the other team was a mashup of tagless randoms. They were saying something to the tune of 'Can't even win in a big group' etc.
As for the beer team part, those were the words used by your guys, not mine.
Edited by Valore, 10 October 2014 - 08:32 PM.
#26
Posted 10 October 2014 - 09:02 PM
So you {Richard Cameron} saying that drops (both times my team had no more than a 5 man) against larger groups are rare, I had it on the FIRST TWO GROUP DROPS. That is 100%, I would like you to know, since comparatives are clearly difficult for you.
Edited by TheRealAbray, 10 October 2014 - 09:04 PM.
#27
Posted 10 October 2014 - 09:07 PM
EDIT: So update, that's still 100% of drops my team has had <5 man groups, and enemy team is either 12 man or >5 mans....
Also as soon as I know how to post images, I'll show the results of these 3 drops
EDIT2: we beat the boogieman twice, but that only CONFIRMS HE EXISTS.
EDIT3: 4th drop we finally get placed against another scattered team. so 25% against scattered teams, 75% against organized 8-12 man teams.....and my ******* lost the second screenshot of our drop against the boogieman. But we beat them both times, and I have the other 3 SS
Edited by TheRealAbray, 10 October 2014 - 09:31 PM.
#28
Posted 10 October 2014 - 10:06 PM
Mellifluer, on 10 October 2014 - 05:15 PM, said:
everyone else should get their own que.
I dont group because alot of my friends want to play casually but that simply isnt possible in the group que.
at least solo i can lone wolf it and do my own thing in the group que its "get TS and go meta or go home" which i just think is garbage.
Come CW, if you play it, be prepared to face 12 mans alot.
#29
Posted 10 October 2014 - 10:35 PM
TheRealAbray, on 10 October 2014 - 09:07 PM, said:
EDIT: So update, that's still 100% of drops my team has had <5 man groups, and enemy team is either 12 man or >5 mans....
Also as soon as I know how to post images, I'll show the results of these 3 drops
EDIT2: we beat the boogieman twice, but that only CONFIRMS HE EXISTS.
EDIT3: 4th drop we finally get placed against another scattered team. so 25% against scattered teams, 75% against organized 8-12 man teams.....and my ******* lost the second screenshot of our drop against the boogieman. But we beat them both times, and I have the other 3 SS
You must be an expert on statistical analysis.
#30
Posted 10 October 2014 - 11:24 PM
As it stands now if i try to bring a friend in to the game and make a 2 man group with him we will be put in to the group queue and since he would be new to the game it would be very demoralizing and as such i just dont bother trying to get friends in to the game or i tell them they should try it but we shouldnt group together for a while while he learns the game at which point i have to explain why and they mostly decide not to bother. I'm sure some of you have had the same experience.
#31
Posted 10 October 2014 - 11:30 PM
[color=#959595]edit: so most nights we start at 2-4 but get to 10-12. [/color]
#33
Posted 11 October 2014 - 12:16 AM
Mellifluer, on 10 October 2014 - 05:15 PM, said:
everyone else should get their own que.
I dont group because alot of my friends want to play casually but that simply isnt possible in the group que.
at least solo i can lone wolf it and do my own thing in the group que its "get TS and go meta or go home" which i just think is garbage.
i remember back in close beta where friends and i would do drunk mech rage fighting.... i miss 7 auswomes and 1 wang charging single file all loaded with the worst weapons back then.
#34
Posted 11 October 2014 - 02:25 AM
#36
Posted 11 October 2014 - 02:46 AM
It got to the point where we'd not be playing to WIN, as that was a foregone conclusion, but to beat our past TIME RECORD FOR SWEEPS.
There was one at 2 minutes 24 seconds.
I did feel slightly bad for the guys we were running into constantly. Jack's channel, which I linked above, has a couple other 12 man drops from that session, and there are probably a couple other videos around. We lost one match. True story.
#37
Posted 11 October 2014 - 03:06 AM
Vassago Rain, on 11 October 2014 - 02:46 AM, said:
It got to the point where we'd not be playing to WIN, as that was a foregone conclusion, but to beat our past TIME RECORD FOR SWEEPS.
There was one at 2 minutes 24 seconds.
I did feel slightly bad for the guys we were running into constantly. Jack's channel, which I linked above, has a couple other 12 man drops from that session, and there are probably a couple other videos around. We lost one match. True story.
Had fun playing you guys yesterday actually. 1 win apiece it ended. First round was absolutely embarrassing loss, second round a lot better

#38
Posted 11 October 2014 - 03:14 AM
Roland, on 10 October 2014 - 05:39 PM, said:
BECAUSE THERE AREN'T THAT MANY 12 MAN TEAMS.
the game was great 8v8 12v12 killed it for alot of ppl. now its just a cluster **** of mechs
#40
Posted 11 October 2014 - 07:53 AM
Budor, on 11 October 2014 - 05:31 AM, said:
Seeing 2-4 corp tags on a team does not mean that these players are 2-4 seperate drops.
Yeah but you have a few that are very casual that might have problems running 12. There is a higher chance of going against another 12 Man when you have a larger group.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users