Jump to content

9 Days Until Quirks


79 replies to this topic

#1 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 07:51 AM

So this is a big step for the franchise. What does everyone think about how itll play out?

Also if Russ or someone reads this, could you throw us a bone and let us in on a low tier mech with some powerful quirks to spur some discussion?

Im pretty excited about it. Its the first entirely new addition PGI has added to the franchise. Even if its kind of a lame duck on its first time out, it seems like a system that can easily be tweaked, and it may be a permanent part of the franchise from here on out.

Heres a list of the BT Quirks:

http://www.sarna.net...i/Design_Quirks

Wonder which of these we'll get. Some seem useless for our environment, others, like Extended Torso Twist, Fast Reload, Low Profile, Cowl, seem to fit right into MWO.

Edited by KraftySOT, 12 October 2014 - 07:52 AM.


#2 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 12 October 2014 - 07:52 AM

We were already told of Locust quirks such as +100% leg internal structure, some ERLL cooldown bonuses (1V variant at least), ERLL beam duration reduction, arm armor, and a few other things that I don't remember.

Edited by FupDup, 12 October 2014 - 07:53 AM.


#3 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:05 AM

View PostFupDup, on 12 October 2014 - 07:52 AM, said:

We were already told of Locust quirks such as +100% leg internal structure, some ERLL cooldown bonuses (1V variant at least), ERLL beam duration reduction, arm armor, and a few other things that I don't remember.



Yeah I heard about the Locust but didnt see it in Helmars dev tracker. I thought it was getting all its internals doubled?

Very cool about the specific weapons buffs.

Im wondering what like, the worst tier'd Wolverines quirks are going to be. In the table top that mech was a beast with pulse lasers and jump jets. Im really curious what PGI can do with some of the mechs that are just plain ignored these days. It sounds like they will be quite powerful but niched (very cool imho)

#4 Bulletsponge0

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Vicious
  • The Vicious
  • 2,950 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:20 AM


Please PGI....give us this!!!







Battlefists




The Hand actuators of a 'Mech with Battlefists have been specially modified for close combat. The Quirk gives a bonus to-hit with Punch attacks.

Applicable to: BattleMechs and IndustrialMechs with Hand Actuators. [9]

#5 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:23 AM

Melee would be cool. But im not getting my hopes up lol.

Im just happy to see a real detailed Quirk system. If PGI was going to add one new game device, im glad its this. Franchise could have used this to balance out mechs ages ago.

Its really just flavor in the TT, but here its needed to hamfist mechs that dont translate well, into the meta.

#6 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:27 AM

View PostFupDup, on 12 October 2014 - 07:52 AM, said:

We were already told of Locust quirks such as +100% leg internal structure, some ERLL cooldown bonuses (1V variant at least), ERLL beam duration reduction, arm armor, and a few other things that I don't remember.


Wut, ERLL? Who uses an ERLL on a Locust anymore?

#7 LORD TSARKON

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 776 posts
  • LocationButtmunch City

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:29 AM

Seems to me that every mech in the game already has this negative quirk

Bad Reputation
A unit with the Bad Reputation quirk is perfectly sound and operable, but for some reason has earned an undeservedly bad reputation, and as a result is only worth half the normal resale value - although when purchasing such a unit, players in a game should pay full price.[40] Applicable to: AeroSpace Fighters, BattleMechs, Battle Armor, Combat Vehicles, DropShips, JumpShips, Small Craft, Space Stations, Support Vehicles, WarShips[37] and ProtoMechs.[4]

Edited by LORD TSARKON, 12 October 2014 - 08:30 AM.


#8 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 08:45 AM

Yeah think the P-39 Aircobra in world war two.

Our pilots hated it...we threw them at Russia because they had such a bad reputation in the lend lease and they went on to prove that it was a perfectly good airframe and a match for the ME109E and F it was up against.

Bad reputation.

The F-105 Starfighter also comes to mind. We loved them. Sold them to West Germany...and they called it the Widowmaker because they thought it was such a piece of trash.

#9 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:09 AM

I wonder what quirks the BNC-3M will get?

#10 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:09 AM

View PostMcgral18, on 12 October 2014 - 09:09 AM, said:

I wonder what quirks the BNC-3M will get?



Wondering about the 3E myself.

#11 Onmyoudo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Scythe
  • The Scythe
  • 955 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:21 AM

View PostMcgral18, on 12 October 2014 - 09:09 AM, said:

I wonder what quirks the BNC-3M will get?


+50% heat to all pulse lasers.

#12 Straker XL

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • The People
  • 51 posts
  • LocationFt. Worth, TX

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:22 AM

I'm really excited to see what they've come up with! It's gonna be like mech Christmas for me and for a lot of other people with quite a few Tier 3-5 mechs. A lot of those mechs I feel very proficient with as is and can do some great work in them, however I do agree with the buffs to add flavor and bring them in line with Clans.

I like how they tested the idea before with quirks on the Awesome, Centurion, Dragon and Hunchback and understand that those buffs did not go far enough to make those chassis a solid choice.

I have been looking forward to expanding my hangar, I just haven't been able to justify the expenditure of the c-bills on a platform that doesn't compare to the output of the 5 or 6 IS mechs that are somewhat decent. Hopefully these changes will alleviate that problem.

#13 Alek Ituin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,525 posts
  • LocationMy Lolcust's cockpit

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:42 AM

View PostKraftySOT, on 12 October 2014 - 08:45 AM, said:

Yeah think the P-39 Aircobra in world war two.

Our pilots hated it...we threw them at Russia because they had such a bad reputation in the lend lease and they went on to prove that it was a perfectly good airframe and a match for the ME109E and F it was up against.

Bad reputation.

The F-105 Starfighter also comes to mind. We loved them. Sold them to West Germany...and they called it the Widowmaker because they thought it was such a piece of trash.


P-39 was still a pile of trash either way. Horrid CG, terrible stall characteristics, and it would spin like nobodies business if you handled it like a normal plane. It was also incapable of high or even mid altitude work, and as such, could be easily outperformed if dragged to 6km or so. There were much better planes such as the La-5, La-7, and Yak-3 available to the Russians. Oh, and even the earliest Bf-109F series were superior to the P-39, not to mention the 190 Antons.

P-39 was obsolete and outperformed by 1942... not the best plane for any analogy.

As for the Starfighter, everybody who flew it thought it was horrible. It had a ridiculously high landing speed, and it ended up killing more of its pilots than the enemy... that's the mark of a terribad aircraft no matter what.

Both aircraft would have solidly earned the "Bad Reputation" quirk with everybody (except the Russians).


I get what you're trying to say though, I really do. But having a keen interest in WWII aviation, I couldn't help but point out the flaws in your statement. Sorry 'bout that... I'll leave now... :/

#14 Satan n stuff

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 3,508 posts
  • LocationLooking right at you, lining up my shot.

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:43 AM

View PostKraftySOT, on 12 October 2014 - 08:05 AM, said:

Yeah I heard about the Locust but didnt see it in Helmars dev tracker. I thought it was getting all its internals doubled?

Probably not, that would make it tougher than a Commando.

#15 CHH Badkarma

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 831 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:49 AM

Ah, maybe the fact that the Atlas has no cooling jacket on its AC20 will finally make things a little toasty when it is used

#16 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:50 AM

I can already hear the whine of the PTW clan pilots through the tear in the space time continueum that the prospect of a fair playing field has created.

#17 Alek Ituin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,525 posts
  • LocationMy Lolcust's cockpit

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:51 AM

View PostCHH Badkarma, on 12 October 2014 - 09:49 AM, said:

Ah, maybe the fact that the Atlas has no cooling jacket on its AC20 will finally make things a little toasty when it is used


Yes, because the Atlas needs more negative attributes. Atlas OP, amirite?

*rolls eyes*

#18 KraftySOT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,617 posts

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:52 AM

View PostAlek Ituin, on 12 October 2014 - 09:42 AM, said:


P-39 was still a pile of trash either way. Horrid CG, terrible stall characteristics, and it would spin like nobodies business if you handled it like a normal plane. It was also incapable of high or even mid altitude work, and as such, could be easily outperformed if dragged to 6km or so. There were much better planes such as the La-5, La-7, and Yak-3 available to the Russians. Oh, and even the earliest Bf-109F series were superior to the P-39, not to mention the 190 Antons.

P-39 was obsolete and outperformed by 1942... not the best plane for any analogy.

As for the Starfighter, everybody who flew it thought it was horrible. It had a ridiculously high landing speed, and it ended up killing more of its pilots than the enemy... that's the mark of a terribad aircraft no matter what.

Both aircraft would have solidly earned the "Bad Reputation" quirk with everybody (except the Russians).


I get what you're trying to say though, I really do. But having a keen interest in WWII aviation, I couldn't help but point out the flaws in your statement. Sorry 'bout that... I'll leave now... :/


Well the CoG problem was mainly at high altitudes and high speeds, not something that the Russians experienced very often on the Ost Front. The fights were generally below 4km and at low speeds. Its stall characteristics were actually better than the 109E and F, that suffered from wing slat problems. Also ts centerline 20mm, while better than the powder puffers in the wings in the Emil...didnt do much actual damage, especially to the hardy Russian aircraft. The 20mm on the P39 were imported Hispanos. Considerably better.

But yeah the Lavotckins were clearly better airframes. It was most definitely out dated by Mid-42. But during the opening months and winter of Barbarossa when the first P39s were arriving, they were very effective, when the only other really decent aircraft being fielded by the VVS was the Mig3 and La3.

Fair points though. Im also a big WWII aviation buff.

But my main point was that those earned bad reputation "quirks" whether they deserved it or not. One mans trash is another mans treasure. Even if they did deserve it, thats kind of how real world versions of the "quirk" work. Its something thats relevant in real life too. Very cool quirk.

PS:

And the Butcher Bird (the 190) was better than everything else in the world at the time. A true super star of engineering. Kurt Tank was a bad ass.

And of course part of why the P-39 was loved, was that a few came with 37mms...which was nice...and the Luftwaffes insistence on covering its CAS aircraft tightly for the first year of the war. Trying to perserve those aircraft that they werent building but 6-10 of a week....that were sitting ducks for cannon armed fighters.

Edited by KraftySOT, 12 October 2014 - 09:58 AM.


#19 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:53 AM

View PostSatan n stuff, on 12 October 2014 - 09:43 AM, said:

Probably not, that would make it tougher than a Commando.


What if the 25 tonners also got that buff? Koshi will need it.

View PostJohnny Z, on 12 October 2014 - 09:50 AM, said:

I can already hear the whine of the PTW clan pilots through the tear in the space time continueum that the prospect of a fair playing field has created.


:rolleyes:

#20 Mothykins

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Talon
  • Talon
  • 1,125 posts
  • Locationilikerice is my hero.

Posted 12 October 2014 - 09:53 AM

View PostYeonne Greene, on 12 October 2014 - 08:27 AM, said:


Wut, ERLL? Who uses an ERLL on a Locust anymore?

Yeah, I already complained about this. It's pretty much the single most nonsensical buff I've seen.
1V should have gotten either MedLas or Machine Gun buffs, TBH, as opposed to a single gun that takes up a quarter of the 'Mech. I:


Though I'm REALLY looking forwards to seeing what they give the K2 and Jester. (Please be Buffs to PPC, Pleeeeease be PPC Buffs...)





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users