Tastian, on 04 November 2014 - 06:16 AM, said:
https://docs.google....&pli=1&sle=true
For the most part I love them. They are mostly buffing stock builds and I think we'll see quite a few dusty mechs on the field again.
Some quirks seem different then stock but better. I think the Dragon 1C / 1N / 5N and Locust 1V fit this category.
But some are just terrible. These are the ones that bug me the most:
1) Firestarter S - This mech has dual AMS and 7 energy hard points which make it the best Firestarter for running in the middle of things. But PGI is buffing ER Large Lasers....
2) Kintaro 18 - With a stock build that has a single LRM5 and 3 SRM6s, PGI gives major quirks to the LRM5.
3) Catapult K2 - Best known for its high mounted PPCs and controversial exploited ballistic slots, PGI quirks medium lasers and the ballistic slot. Really?
And the one that bothers me the most:
4) Dragon Flame - I paid good money for this and have mainly enjoyed 4 Large Lasers or a Gauss and 4 Medium Lasers. Stock it has ER Large and AC2 (which they give buffs to the other Dragon variants) But, no, PGI gives it an AC20 buff. And not even a good one like cooldown. The Flame is NOT a Hunchback. Dragons have to go fast which mean XL engines. This makes no sense to me. And why oh why is it considered a Tier 3 mech??
Sure there are others including the Blackjacks, but these 4 really bug me.
Which ones bothers you the most?
Boar's Head AC10 buff -.-
Livewyr, on 04 November 2014 - 06:21 AM, said:
This.
IMO they should have polled (imagine that right?) the players with possible quirks then went with the ones that got the highest quirks.