Sjorpha, on 02 December 2014 - 09:46 AM, said:
I would install the best possible module, in ALL mechs. And the difference between them would not be that module anymore than radar deprivation or seismic sensor.
"It depends on the pilot" type arguments are just basic logical fallacies.
In this instance, I agree, though in general not 100% true. Anytime you introduce the "human element" into an equation, it adds unpredictable variables. a .44 magnum is a "better" handgun cartridge than a .357. More power, more penetration, better range, and seems in general easier to load for accuracy. But in the hands of actual people, (not even getting into situational variables) it may not be, because it's recoil is such that many people cannot use it effectively.
End of the day, while you have to base the chassis on their "paper" merits overall, for comparison to one another, one cannot overlook the human element when it comes to how individual players will do in each one. The biggest issue is,that there is no "measurement" that can accurately predict and catalogue that factor.
But that in the end has more to do with how individual pilots do (usually in "sub-optimal" builds, than comparing en masses, where the genpop will generally fall into the mainstream categories, and the human factor has to do more with outliers (like me kicking peoples butt in a Vindicator. Objectively a worse mech than the BJ-1, but subjectively, in my hands, miles better)
That said (rather long windedly, too!) in THIS Topic, human factor is largely irrelevant, aside from the Elo difference on the last Clan vs IS test, since that was measurable. For the mainstream, chassis on chassis comparison, the human element is not a factor, as you said.