46 replies to this topic

[Sandpit]

It's brutally apparent that some of you simply haven't read or misunderstood info passed along

I'll let you have your rant now since you don't want to listen (like many on here) when someone who did the research tries to clarify for you.
Carry on
(Lol yea I'm the one who doesn't know what he's talking about. I'm not the one making assumptions. I read and listened to the official info and did the research. Good luck getting pgi to listen to your feedback when they're probably trying to figure why you're complaining about something that doesn't exist )

[EgoSlayer]

Sandpit, on 06 December 2014 - 10:39 AM, said:

It's brutally apparent that some of you simply haven't read or misunderstood info passed along

I'll let you have your rant now since you don't want to listen (like many on here) when someone who did the research tries to clarify for you.
Carry on
(Lol yea I'm the one who doesn't know what he's talking about. I'm not the one making assumptions. I read and listened to the official info and did the research. Good luck getting pgi to listen to your feedback when they're probably trying to figure why you're complaining about something that doesn't exist )

Dude - seriously - it is you that is misinformed. Quote your references that say otherwise, but I'll start with the facts, re clarified straight from Paul:
http://mwomercs.com/...e-update-dec-2/

Quote

Grouping In CW

To re-emphasis what has been mentioned before. Community Warfare is primarily directed to role-playing and unit gameplay. It is because of this that groups in CW (Unit Groups) will consist of only players within the same unit. A team can have players from multiple units but groups themselves will only consist of players who are in the same group/faction.

Edited by EgoSlayer, 06 December 2014 - 05:40 PM.

[Lily from animove]

Sandpit, on 06 December 2014 - 10:39 AM, said:

It's brutally apparent that some of you simply haven't read or misunderstood info passed along

I'll let you have your rant now since you don't want to listen (like many on here) when someone who did the research tries to clarify for you.
Carry on
(Lol yea I'm the one who doesn't know what he's talking about. I'm not the one making assumptions. I read and listened to the official info and did the research. Good luck getting pgi to listen to your feedback when they're probably trying to figure why you're complaining about something that doesn't exist )

then how about you quote those parts for me and show us all where I am wrong? but maybe you will just find what egoslayer alerady mentioned. Suggesting people to read and telling them to be misinformed when you are clearly wrong is hardly the way to to be taken serious.

[Captain Stiffy]

Oh so you must be in an group/outfit or whatever to participate in CW?

So much for this game.

Might be a little different if there were ANY IN CLIENT COMMUNITY TOOLS whatsoever.

[Captain Stiffy]

I mean they can't even be arsed to give us a global chat or even an in-game chat that works properly.

[Violent Nick]

Ghost Badger, on 05 December 2014 - 09:09 AM, said:

You're saying these things like this isn't how the current Group queue already works.



Fair. I can understand that. I could see adding in non-unit members of the same in-game Faction. I don't see why THAT would create issues, and would give smaller groups, and groups like the Marik Alliance, an option.

VOIP and an interface overhaul would be very sensible at this point.. I think Russ and co. were a bit caught out on quite how involved CW would be as they have already admitted.

[Lily from animove]

Captain Stiffy, on 07 December 2014 - 04:13 AM, said:

Oh so you must be in an group/outfit or whatever to participate in CW?

So much for this game.

Might be a little different if there were ANY IN CLIENT COMMUNITY TOOLS whatsoever.

No you don't, but then you are basically solo-queuing into a queue where you can and will face groups as well and in wirse case a full 12 premade group.