Sad About Dragon Changes
#1
Posted 09 December 2014 - 02:57 AM
Dragon 1C: All energy heat gen quirks removed aswell - completely useless now, or do they really think you can get close up and brawl with it? It was just ok with 4x ER LL before...
Blindly aligning quirks to stock layout without putting any sense or logic into it...
This is just a sick joke, right? Can someone please wake me up from this bad dream?
#2
Posted 09 December 2014 - 03:25 AM
Other games are really sensitive to make any change to premium material, it seems they don't have this sensitivity and they should pay the price for it.
#3
Posted 09 December 2014 - 03:30 AM
#4
Posted 09 December 2014 - 03:31 AM
Buying something based on the quirks however, which they made clear could and would see some changes and balancing, wasn't a smart move on anyone's part, but this is a general issue with the game.
Why spend money on something when there's absolutely zero guarantee it won't be completely altered the next day? I know people still do it, but it does seem quite silly to buy heroes in this game at this point.
#5
Posted 09 December 2014 - 03:44 AM
Shadow Magnet, on 09 December 2014 - 02:57 AM, said:
This is really anoying. My beloved PPC/ERPPC build (that I never encountered on the battlefield) is now as weak as it was before. It never was a strong build, especially not with the hard nerfing PPCs took over the last month and with the bad hit detection. I don't really understand, why they removed the "-Energy heat" quirk.
#6
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:34 AM
Kodyn, on 09 December 2014 - 03:31 AM, said:
Buying something based on the quirks however, which they made clear could and would see some changes and balancing, wasn't a smart move on anyone's part, but this is a general issue with the game.
Why spend money on something when there's absolutely zero guarantee it won't be completely altered the next day? I know people still do it, but it does seem quite silly to buy heroes in this game at this point.
This. Instead of using normal buffs like armour and speed, they rely on highly situation based quirks that are only useful for certain builds given a certain meta. The whole idea that you're free to choose any build you want and that you shouldn't feel pressured to stick to the weapons buffed by quirks is silly, because the powerful weapon buffs are the only things making certain variants viable in the current meta. If you put anything but SRM4's on a Huginn, it's a terrible mech. If you put SRM4's on it, it's devastating.
#7
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:38 AM
#8
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:40 AM
Kodyn, on 09 December 2014 - 03:31 AM, said:
Buying something based on the quirks however, which they made clear could and would see some changes and balancing, wasn't a smart move on anyone's part, but this is a general issue with the game.
Why spend money on something when there's absolutely zero guarantee it won't be completely altered the next day? I know people still do it, but it does seem quite silly to buy heroes in this game at this point.
I was expecting that they play with parameters like not %25 AC2 CD but %20 AC2 CD but that they will throw away the whole AC2 quirks, yeah I was flat footed there.
But as said I was flat footed, never again.
But remember the Quirkening Sale, they planned to cash in with quirks change, you like to change buy the thing with MC, next day change it to something complete else. You can even consider this as felony.
Edited by speleomaniac, 09 December 2014 - 04:58 AM.
#9
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:41 AM
Whos idea were the Dragon 5N quirks??!?
What are you thinking about when you assign quirks to a mech? whitle lil ponies?! UAC5 quirks for a mech that is only able to carry a single UAC5 having the opportunity to carry 3 ballistics? why not sticking to AC2s?!
whaaat...
#10
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:43 AM
Kodyn, on 09 December 2014 - 03:31 AM, said:
Buying something based on the quirks however, which they made clear could and would see some changes and balancing, wasn't a smart move on anyone's part, but this is a general issue with the game.
Why spend money on something when there's absolutely zero guarantee it won't be completely altered the next day? I know people still do it, but it does seem quite silly to buy heroes in this game at this point.
To the point, indeed. I never expected they would change the Dragons (or CN9-AL) in an extreme way like this. Small fixes if something is too powerfull, ok. But basically they made a couple of mech variants useless garage keepers again that would be a liability to your team if you field them. I thought the goal of the quirks was the exact opposite?
#11
Posted 09 December 2014 - 04:46 AM
speleomaniac, on 09 December 2014 - 03:25 AM, said:
Other games are really sensitive to make any change to premium material, it seems they don't have this sensitivity and they should pay the price for it.
If "premium" material is deemed nerf-worthy, "premium" material should be nerfed. Get used to it.
#12
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:02 AM
The Boz, on 09 December 2014 - 04:46 AM, said:
So let see WoT nerfs Super Pershing, you get a full refund, they nerf TDs, they didn't dare to touch E-25.
So there are some lessons to take here, I have a better idea, I don't buy any premium material, this is definitely better for PGI isn't it.
Edited by speleomaniac, 09 December 2014 - 05:02 AM.
#13
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:06 AM
Daelen Rottiger, on 09 December 2014 - 04:41 AM, said:
Whos idea were the Dragon 5N quirks??!?
What are you thinking about when you assign quirks to a mech? whitle lil ponies?! UAC5 quirks for a mech that is only able to carry a single UAC5 having the opportunity to carry 3 ballistics? why not sticking to AC2s?!
whaaat...
It's almost like they aren't in line with the meta? OMG! Impossibru!!!
I have more faith now that PGI is on track and knows what they are doing than I have in the past. Thanks PGI for trying to balance this great game!
#14
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:06 AM
The Boz, on 09 December 2014 - 04:46 AM, said:
Can you please explain the logic behind the changes to 1C and 5N? The "OP" variant 1N was not nerfed, the other variants were OP and needed nerfs? Really???
#15
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:08 AM
speleomaniac, on 09 December 2014 - 05:02 AM, said:
So let see WoT nerfs Super Pershing, you get a full refund, they nerf TDs, they didn't dare to touch E-25.
So there are some lessons to take here, I have a better idea, I don't buy any premium material, this is definitely better for PGI isn't it.
It is better for the game to minimize pay to win scenarios, yes.
Shadow Magnet, on 09 December 2014 - 05:06 AM, said:
Can you please explain the logic behind the changes to 1C and 5N? The "OP" variant 1N was not nerfed, the other variants were OP and needed nerfs? Really???
Now, see, that is the topic to discuss here.
#16
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:08 AM
Very sad to see them lost.
#17
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:09 AM
cdlord, on 09 December 2014 - 05:06 AM, said:
I have more faith now that PGI is on track and knows what they are doing than I have in the past. Thanks PGI for trying to balance this great game!
You are seriously saying that a single UAC5 is useful? That 2 or 3 AC2 were too powerful?
#18
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:11 AM
Shadow Magnet, on 09 December 2014 - 05:09 AM, said:
You are seriously saying that a single UAC5 is useful? That 2 or 3 AC2 were too powerful?
I'm saying it would be if people weren't always going for meta, shoe-horning in as many weapons as possible and one-buttoning it across the battlefield. The tears that result from some meta or another being nerfed are delicious.
#19
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:12 AM
sigh....it was what a tier 4 mech and now its too op? Not like tons of them are running around or anything. Still barely see them.
and no 2x or 3x AC2 was/is not OP or anything. Its a ton o fun but you don't win with them.
4x ERLL dragon wasn't even that great with the quirks.
Almost sounds like I'll be back to to AC/10 + LL or PPC or LPL again.
Edited by Bigbacon, 09 December 2014 - 05:14 AM.
#20
Posted 09 December 2014 - 05:12 AM
cdlord, on 09 December 2014 - 05:11 AM, said:
That doesn't answer my question. So please, what build you suggest for the 5N with the new quirks?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users