Jump to content

White Phosphorus


9 replies to this topic

#1 Straith

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 36 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:30 AM

A new consumable to dump down a smoke screen to obscure vision and heat vision on the battlefield. Very useful for attackers on CW trying to push up in the choke points.

#2 Clydewinder

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 447 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:49 AM

Good idea. Or, on a similar note, an EMP artillery strike that scrambles sensors i.e. mass ECM for 15 seconds/30 seconds/whatever.

#3 Josef Nader

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,243 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:51 AM

I support smoke barrages to give attackers openings.

#4 DONTOR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,806 posts
  • LocationStuck on a piece of Commando in my Ice Ferret

Posted 15 December 2014 - 10:54 AM

I agree the red smoke screen isnt very effective, would rather have an actually obscuring smoke screen.

#5 M0rpHeu5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • 956 posts
  • LocationGreece

Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:03 AM

PGI has stated the it is a good idea but it will couse FPS drops on the weaker computers so it isn't in the game

#6 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:05 AM

View PostM0rpHeu5, on 15 December 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

PGI has stated the it is a good idea but it will couse FPS drops on the weaker computers so it isn't in the game


So the Counterstrike lag-grenade theory?

Edited by Rhaythe, 15 December 2014 - 11:05 AM.


#7 Straith

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 36 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:23 AM

View PostM0rpHeu5, on 15 December 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

PGI has stated the it is a good idea but it will couse FPS drops on the weaker computers so it isn't in the game


I'm sure they can come up with strategies for how to have this work when the game is run on a toaster. This is really needed for attackers to get some dynamic cover during a battle.

#8 Lukoi Banacek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • WC 2018 Top 12 Qualifier
  • 4,353 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 11:36 AM

Milder damage, smaller burst radius, increased smoke for the WP.

Current heavier damage/wider radius but nearly useless smoke for Strikes.

Dig it.

#9 BumbleBee

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 541 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 12:18 PM

I love the idea.

Some people REALLY need to upgrade their PC's so everyone can have these nice things. Hell, look at what we had in Closed Beta. My PC is 5-6yrs old, a 1st gen i5 and while i have some framerate issues on 1 or 2 maps under certain circumstances, the game plays really well on high pretty much all the time.

#10 Rhaythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,203 posts

Posted 15 December 2014 - 12:25 PM

View PostBumbleBee, on 15 December 2014 - 12:18 PM, said:

I love the idea.

Some people REALLY need to upgrade their PC's so everyone can have these nice things. Hell, look at what we had in Closed Beta. My PC is 5-6yrs old, a 1st gen i5 and while i have some framerate issues on 1 or 2 maps under certain circumstances, the game plays really well on high pretty much all the time.

As someone that's played on both sides of the CPU fence, I can tell you that the i5/i7 series runs MWO waaaaaaaaaay better than anything AMD produces. It's not necessarily that many peoples computers are old or poor - it's just that this game is poorly optimized, and runs like *garbage* on AMD.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users