Jump to content

Should The Cw Map Update Twice A Day

Balance

30 replies to this topic

Poll: CW Map Updates Twice A Day (103 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you think the CW should update twice a day?

  1. Yes, it would allow everyone to affect the CW map regardless of what timezone they live it. (51 votes [49.51%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 49.51%

  2. Three times or more a day. (17 votes [16.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 16.50%

  3. No, once a day is just fine and here's why, post below. (6 votes [5.83%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.83%

  4. Once a day but at random times. (11 votes [10.68%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.68%

  5. More than once a day and random times. Let's get crazy! (12 votes [11.65%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.65%

  6. I'm not sure let's talk about this. (6 votes [5.83%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.83%

  7. Cease Fire doesn't happen every day (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Mao of DC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 690 posts
  • LocationTerra, Sol System

Posted 20 December 2014 - 12:55 PM

View PostNicolai Kabrinsky, on 20 December 2014 - 11:53 AM, said:


An arbitrary system like this is a bad way to ensure that weak Factions stay alive. They should be using Mercenaries and increased rewards for that.


We are currently only in Phase 2 of CW. My thoughts on what they can add to Phase 3 is here and it addresses your concerns about using Mercenaries.

http://mwomercs.com/...__fromsearch__1

#22 Mao of DC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 690 posts
  • LocationTerra, Sol System

Posted 26 December 2014 - 07:46 AM

Did you vote yet?

#23 BIoB

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 26 December 2014 - 08:57 AM

Yes completely random times of the day WITHOUT a clock counting down

However i wouldn't like to see 3 planets flipping per day on each front

#24 Saiphas Cain

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 189 posts

Posted 26 December 2014 - 10:30 AM

I get about an hour and a half a night to play. Ceasefire happens a few minutes after I get on every single night so if I'm not fast enough getting the drop ready or I'm even a few minutes late I pretty much get no CW that night. Even when the stars align I usually only get 1 drop. A rolling time would be ideal and would silence complaints, not that there's much merit in most of them.
Every victory counts. You're not the only ones fighting for each planet.

#25 Ax2Grind

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 816 posts

Posted 26 December 2014 - 10:31 AM

Why not keep it 24 hours but just tally all the attacks for the day to make sure that every attack and defense counts? Or do away with the ceasefire time completely and allow planets to be captured based purely on a number of successful attacks? Any ceasefire like we currently have will still cultivate cries of "meaningless" CW time. Keep it simple and just tally a full days worth of attacks and defenses or take away the time frame and make it purely based on the number of successful sectors attacked and held.

#26 Mao of DC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 690 posts
  • LocationTerra, Sol System

Posted 27 December 2014 - 09:48 AM

View PostAx2Grind, on 26 December 2014 - 10:31 AM, said:

Why not keep it 24 hours but just tally all the attacks for the day to make sure that every attack and defense counts? Or do away with the ceasefire time completely and allow planets to be captured based purely on a number of successful attacks? Any ceasefire like we currently have will still cultivate cries of "meaningless" CW time. Keep it simple and just tally a full days worth of attacks and defenses or take away the time frame and make it purely based on the number of successful sectors attacked and held.


I am given to understand that the cease fires are needed by the server so it can update itself. Move the borders, assign the occupying unit, and randomly pick another group of attack/defend worlds. So sadly as of right now the ceasefires are needed from a systems stand point if nothing else.

#27 Chagatay

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 964 posts

Posted 27 December 2014 - 04:57 PM

Still liking the fixed + random timer combo the best 12h + 0-24hr to me seems ideal. Some breathing room, same average number of planet flips (once per day average), much bigger window of opportunity, and of course more war.

#28 C E Dwyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,274 posts
  • LocationHiding in the periphery, from Bounty Hunters

Posted 27 December 2014 - 05:14 PM

I think once a day at a random time is the best option because if its twoice, while I do think its a better option than we have presently, planets will switch to often with a twice aday method

#29 Yukichi Fukuzawa

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 63 posts
  • LocationJapan?

Posted 27 December 2014 - 08:34 PM

Where is my less than once a day option?

#30 Mao of DC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 690 posts
  • LocationTerra, Sol System

Posted 29 December 2014 - 10:27 AM

View PostYukichi Fukuzawa, on 27 December 2014 - 08:34 PM, said:

Where is my less than once a day option?


That option has been addressed.

#31 pwnface

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,009 posts

Posted 29 December 2014 - 12:23 PM

4 times a day sounds good to me.

This allows for much more of a push/pull on planets and you'll have to rely on all time zones to focus and hold planets.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users