BattleMech 4 - Dragon
#181
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:21 PM
#182
Posted 23 November 2011 - 11:17 PM
#183
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:09 AM
#184
Posted 24 November 2011 - 12:33 AM
Xhaleon, on 23 November 2011 - 10:19 AM, said:
What the Dragon does not have are reliable hip actuators. The military brass disregarded engineering reports calling for a heavier actuator design in favor of a cheaper actuator made on nearby Luthien. As a result, the Dragon can suffer from burned micro-bearings, requiring frequent overhauls of the hip assembly.
I guess we won't have to deal with that in the game anyway.
Hehe, why not? If not the game (torso twist hard... *SPLOIK*) starts moving very slowly reroute power from weapon or legs...(UNSPLOIK*)
Heard over comms "DAMMIT MY ZIPPERS STUCK AGAIN!"
Or 9 second prone standing time.
then the meta game chassis cost... you can just assume you never take it out.
"Oh! My hips busted!"
By the way, Defiance industry sells better hip actuators that work on both Dragon and Grand Dragon chassis.
They're $.99
#185
Posted 24 November 2011 - 01:42 AM
#186
Posted 24 November 2011 - 02:10 AM
phelanjkell, on 23 November 2011 - 04:43 PM, said:
Meh, my fault.
Still related 'mechs, though.
Quote
... PPC!
No canon variants exist for the Dragon to have an AC/10 or bigger.
Quote
HGR does't exist yet.
Besides its too heavy for the Dragon.
Even a regular Gauss Rifle forces the DRG-5N to drop the LRM launcher to get the tonnage (or drop armour).
Pretty much the entire reason why the DC went for the PPC - less tonnage used for higher damage.
The DRG-5K would have to drop some speed and the rear lasers.
Quote
Dragon DRG-1N or DRG-5N:
Lostech used: None or CASE+UAC/5.
Bushwacker BSW-X1:
Lostech used: XL Engine, Ferro-Fibrous, ERLL, CASE, DHS.
Bushwacker BSW-X2:
Lostech used: As above, but swaps ERLL for twin MPL.
The Dragon's engine weighs 11 tons more. Upping it to an XLE would give the DRG-5N better firepower, I'd reckon. (XLE frees up 9.5 tons.) Enough for an LB 10-X with two tons of ammo, an ERLL, and twin MGs with ½-ton ammo. Giving it better firepower than the BSW.
Quote
It ain't, this is:
#187
Posted 24 November 2011 - 02:54 AM
#188
Posted 24 November 2011 - 03:08 AM
I once saw an UrbanMech that was standing on top of another UrbanMech. I was the last man to leave the field but the entire unit fled off-planet after catching sight of it.
#189
Posted 24 November 2011 - 03:29 AM
Edited by Deathshade8, 24 November 2011 - 03:33 AM.
#190
Posted 24 November 2011 - 03:55 AM
Thorn Hallis, on 23 November 2011 - 11:17 PM, said:
Aww... I wanted to pilot Shadow Hawk, but by the looks of it, it seems I will have to find new mech. I did not even touch the game and I have to find my new favorite mech again. 3rd time in a row. It is so unfair.
Edited by Adridos, 24 November 2011 - 03:55 AM.
#192
Posted 24 November 2011 - 05:51 AM
Personally, I think the new model is better than the MW4 one. Very glad to see my old ride is coming back in style. ....I'm ripping off that AC5 and LRM10 though.
#193
Posted 24 November 2011 - 05:53 AM
I'll probably want to replace the autocannon and ammo with a PPC and some heat sinks, to reduce dependence on ammo.
edit: I can see why that word might be censored, but that's really... draconian.
[plays The Who in the background and put son some sunglasses]
Edited by Melissia, 24 November 2011 - 05:57 AM.
#194
Posted 24 November 2011 - 07:24 AM
Edited by RacerX, 24 November 2011 - 07:25 AM.
#195
Posted 24 November 2011 - 09:30 AM
The_Birdeater, on 24 November 2011 - 05:31 AM, said:
The mech on the left side is a Strormcrow...
He's probably referring to the beasts behind the mechs...but even then it's still a smoke jaguar (which looks like a skaven ^^).
Edited by Thorn Hallis, 24 November 2011 - 09:32 AM.
#200
Posted 24 November 2011 - 11:01 AM
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users