Jump to content

Better Weapons For Cw Now!


24 replies to this topic

#21 Dirus Nigh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,382 posts

Posted 25 December 2014 - 05:21 PM

Posted Image

#22 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 25 December 2014 - 05:42 PM

View PostDirus Nigh, on 25 December 2014 - 05:21 PM, said:

Posted Image


100% pure awesomesauce.

One of the most common things I say on TS, "SWEEP THE LEG, JOHNNY!"

#23 Tarogato

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 6,558 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 25 December 2014 - 05:50 PM

View PostCyclonerM, on 25 December 2014 - 05:18 PM, said:

Even if this was accepted by all the Clan units, what makes you think that we would fight by Zellbrigen against the IS armies?
-MS- gladly accepted Zellbrigen from Isengrim and friends. Evidence!

Posted Image
Posted Image

We didn't do that poorly, either. It lasted 20 minutes and wasn't too far from even when MS called it off and announced a time that they'd resume normal fighting. TwinkyOverlord did break code and took some shots at my Jenner while I was in single combat with one of their Kitfoxes. Shame on him. But I still won. ^_^

#24 TripleEhBeef

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • The People
  • 700 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 25 December 2014 - 08:54 PM

Your build can core a Timber's rear CT in one alpha and breach the front CT armour in two at optimal range.

I don't think the mech is the problem.

What's your typical ping?

#25 RolfS

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 134 posts

Posted 27 December 2014 - 07:04 AM

We have finally one video showing the problem. JF wins in 27 minutes by attrition. This is very close to the time constraints of CW and very typical if you actually try to win by attrition.

http://youtu.be/z47jJ8DqH0Q

CW needs another patch...





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users